Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (433641)	12/12/2018 11:04:06 AM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Hush or Push When push comes to shove it won't be a judgement call, calling it a "private transaction" won't wash. JMO. I think the writing is on the wall.

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (433641)	12/12/2018 2:54:00 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

He can have multiple motives. The case is a total joke. FECA (52 U.S.C. 30114 (b)(2)) specifically says that campaign-related expenses do not include any expenditures “used to fulfill any commitment, obligation, or expense of a person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s election campaign.” dailysignal.com Now think about the people who are telling you otherwise. Consider how many of those people and organizations there are, all speaking in unison. Did even the Soviets achieve such conformity? We could ask Bernie, but he's busy decorating his new mansion. Tom