Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: louel who wrote (144716)

12/14/2018 8:52:43 PM

From: TobagoJack

Respond to of 217623

Re <<Lets just change a word or two:

Child molestation of children is illegal in most countries,

should we issue red-flag arrest warrant against child rapists travailing from anywhere to anywhere else?

am guessing the answer is "YES", Just because he committed no crime in the country where authorities locate them. Should not shield them from arrest, extradition and prosecution.>>

You are of course not correct, exactly. Child porn is illegal in all jurisdiction I would imaging as is molestation, and when the perps are detained, arrested, and extradited, what actually happened was they in truth and fact are that they are taken in for local infraction (visa, sex crime, etc, but committed locally) and expelled or extradited in crimes committed in another jurisdiction or to individuals / entities in that jurisdiction.

Meng did nothing in USA and to no individual/ entity within USA, and whatever may have been done to any individual / entity, was done by the legal person / entity known as Skycom. Prove any conceivable case against Skycom, then charge its directors for failing at directors’ duties.

Re <<Lets just change a word or two>>

Sexual contact w/ individuals below age of consent is illegal in all countries,

should we issue red-flag arrest warrant against such travailing from anywhere to anywhere else?

am guessing the answer is "NO", Just because he / she / it committed no crime in the country where authorities locate them and no crime in nation where the no-crime age of consent is unusually low (i.e. Japan, age of consent is 13 and older).

What do you think? Meaning you cannot detain and arrest a Japanese tourist in Hawaii for anything he might have done in Japan and extradited him to Saudi Arabia for surgical procedures meted by the open, fair and transparent court. Trust you not only agree but enthusiastically so, per rule of law. Or are you one of those police types who believe the end justifies the means?

You your take be yes, it is okay to send Japanese tourists in Hawaii to Saudi Arabia whenever such tourist sports an underage wife per American and Saudi Arabian definition, then it is obviously okay to start arresting J&J directors past and present, send to to China for marketing asbestos talc powder all around the planet. Don’t worry, the trial would be public, transparent, unbiased, fair, inexpensive, and speedy, and the outcome guaranteed to be satisfying per rule of people as well as of law.

To: louel who wrote (144716)	12/14/2018 9:10:00 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 217623

Only a police family can adore a police state, a guess Below, if true, inarguably, would not be a good trend, and if again true, something is seriously wrong ... what do you think? zerohedge.com Incarceration Crisis: 50% Of Americans Have Had A Family Member JailedThe impact of the incarceration crisis on America’s families and communities has been staggering, according to a new survey by criminal justice non-profit FWD.us and Cornell University. The survey found that today's incarceration rate stands at 710 inmates per 100,000 people compared to 147 in the United Kingdom, 118 in Canada and 98 in France. FWD.us and Cornell University point out that more than 1.5 million people are currently behind bars in state or federal prisons in the US. Admissions to jails have been higher than 10 million per year for at least two decades. These figures explain how over 50% of adults (about 113 million people) has had an immediate family member incarcerated for at least one night in jail. [url=][/url] One in seven adults has had an immediate family member locked up for more than one year, and one in 34 adults has had a family member spend at least ten years in prison. The survey said an estimated 6.5 million people have an immediate family member currently incarcerated in jail or prison (1 in 38). The adverse effects that individuals experience after being incarcerated have been well documented, but more research still needs to be done on the direct and indirect harms and challenges that families and communities suffer. The study shows that incarceration impacts all types of Americans, "rates of family incarceration are similar for Republicans and Democrats — but the impact is unevenly borne by communities of color and families who are low-income. Black people are 50% more likely than white people to have had a family member incarcerated, and three times more likely to have had a family member incarcerated for one year or longer. People earning less than $25,000 per year are 61% more likely than people earning more than $100,000 to have had a family member incarcerated, and three times more likely to have had a family member incarcerated for one year or longer," the survey said. The following infographics visualize the figures from the survey and highlight the shocking realities behind the crisis: [url=][/url] [url=][/url] [url=][/url] [url=][/url] [url=][/url] Incarceration does not just impact the person who is sent to jail, it reverberates into families and destroys communities. So, the biggest threat to Americans is the American police state.