SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: brad greene who wrote (6242)1/17/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: Steve Felix  Respond to of 26039
 
Brad, my friend with SB is probably lost, but I find it hard to believe that anyone who reads this thread, and knows all that IDX has going on would become lost. Impatient maybe, but not lost. Perhaps Kessler just read back through the thread and came upon my post in which I wished he would undershoot just once, instead of too always overshooting. I too used to get impatient, but slow announcements and contracts being pushed back have kind of become the norm. The thing is that they do come. IDX is a small company making all the right moves IMO. Someone IS noticing. Two 100,000+ days so far in 98. Both up. Low volume days can really mean nothing. Everyone really watching knows IDX is being accumulated. IBD A/D rating an A. Happy thoughts with IDX are not hard to come by.



To: brad greene who wrote (6242)1/17/1998 6:17:00 PM
From: art slott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26039
 
Brad or any of you software experts. How difficult would it be for a hacker from the outside or someone on the inside to sabotage a y2k fix. I was reading in the Jan 5 edition of Information Week that fixing the Y2k problem is first on the things to do list for corparate America's IT departments.. Seems to me a hacker would cause havock with this.
What better reason for biometrics.

Art