SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Slumdog who wrote (145056)12/28/2018 3:59:39 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217838
 
The commentators would explain it all Message 31951265 away as “risk off day” at the granular level

Just like the number of variations of pricing action, there are at least 3X number of explanations

I suppose if the USD was genuinely devaluing (irrespective of whether it is devaluing relatively to other currencies), then everything else should go up against it except usd bonds, as cash turns to trash

But we know usd is meant to generally devalue but for other currencies devaluing faster or more immediately, so best to be cautious once usd devaluing relatively to other currencies?

Maybe we are putting too much logic into the schema that is the market. Only the pricing matters? Technicians to the fore and lead us to doom :0)

Martin Armstrong way ... shall hunt up his market views once next to computer

USA politics he figures ...

armstrongeconomics.com

The Coming Political Siege Warfare of 2019

As I have warned, the next two years are going to be an outright political siege warfare. Far more damage will be done to the United States and the world economy in this desperate attempt for the Democrats to retake the White House in 2020. Congress will launch its investigation of Trump’s role in Cohen’s plea that Trump told him to pay hush money to the two women about previous affairs. Claims that Cohen sought to influence the election from the shadows is really petty when they could thereby criminally charge all the board members of Goldman Sachs who banned their employees from donating money to Trump, which is also trying to “influence” the election from the shadows. But that is the problem with the law – it is selective prosecution all the time.

Cohen said the payments to an adult film actress and a former Playboy Playmate were made “in order to influence the 2016 presidential election.” Those are clearly words written by the prosecutor. Those payments, prosecutors say, violated 52 U.S. Code § 30101

(9)

(A) The term “expenditure” includes—

(i) any purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit, or gift of money or anything of value, made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for Federal office; and
(ii) a written contract, promise, or agreement to make an expenditure.

The money was given to the two women loosely falls in the very broad statute as a “gift” and he signed a “written contract” as well. It was Cohen’s words stating “in order to influence the 2016 presidential election” that makes it a crime. If he went to trial, that would be impossible to prove. The two payments were to Playboy Playmate Karen McDougal $150,000 to keep quiet about an alleged 10-month relationship with Trump and Cohen’s $130,000 payment to porn star Stormy Daniels. Cohen could have remained silent.

The theory of how this violated campaign limitations is that the maximum an individual can contribute is $2,700. Since Cohen paid the women, prosecutors made it clear that the payment was a campaign contribution because Cohen was repaid by the Trump Organization after he submitted “sham” invoices for legal work. Then the question falls to did those in the Trump Organization know they were “sham” invoices? Does that then rise to Trump personally? This is where it takes Cohen to say “Trump directed me to make those payments” in order to impeach Trump. The whole thing is rather strange for Trump would have the power to pardon him. He is clearly cutting that option off by this plea. If what Cohen says is true, Trump conspired to violate campaign finance laws by directing payments to keep the women quiet so as to boost his election prospects. Yet the prosecutors also told the court Cohen tries to save himself by blaming others. That merely clouds the issue and calls into question Cohen’s testimony against Trump.

So they also charged Cohen with tax evasion which would be a different issue. To reduce his time, he has to say the words that the prosecutors tell him that will then implicate Trump as a co-conspirator to a felony. This will give the Democrats the foundation to file an impeachment action regardless of the truth. The trial, however, would be in the Senate. Trump would tend to be the type to go to trial.

To start the impeachment process, there must first be drafted the articles of impeachment. Then the 40 members on the House Judiciary Committee vote over whether to bring them to the full House of Representatives. A simple majority vote is needed, in this case, which means 21 members of Congress voting yay are needed in this phase. The Democrats can do that assuming they all vote party line as usual.

Once the articles make it out of the judiciary committee, the 435 members of the House of Representatives debate the merits of the articles of impeachment. In this phase, a simple majority is needed again to continue the impeachment process, which means 218 representatives would have to vote yay in order to confirm impeachment.



Assuming the Democrats vote along party line as expected, the articles of impeachment will then move to the Senate for a Trial. By the time the process brings the president before the Senate in order to defend himself, the “impeachment” part is done. What occurs then is a procedure that would see the president prosecuted by a group of “managers” from the House of Representatives, while a Supreme Court justice presides over the trial. The Senate then acts as the jury. In order for the president to be removed from office, in this case, it would require a two-thirds vote among the 100 senators or 67 votes. That means, 20 Republicans would have to vote to remove him from office. Bill Clinton was impeached and it went to Trial but there were not enough votes to remove him and he too committed a felony of perjury that was directly himself – not a conspiracy.

Elite Republicans hate Trump because he is an outsider. Nevertheless, will 20 Republicans cross lines and vote to remove Trump from office? That is not very likely given the indirect charge of pay money to two women. The charges from Mueller will have to be more direct to win a Senate Trial to remove Trump. No president has ever been removed. The process will be more directed to cripple Trump for 2020 so the Democrats can seize the White House and reverse everything Trump has done including raising taxes substantially and imposing a Global Warming Tax. The Democrats want to raise taxes on the rich to 60% to 70% like the good old days, with plenty of loopholes to gather political donations for exceptions.



To: Slumdog who wrote (145056)12/28/2018 4:33:49 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217838
 
Re <<price action>>

Here is another explanation perhaps using less logic but maybe w/ more facts (i.e. price action, tick by tick). Sounds true. If true, then not good for equities, the false market.

Needless but I will note the apparent anyway, not only did ‘they’ forgot to sell t-bills, also left gold alone, or better, sold near-month-end, quarter-end, year-end gold but to no effect.

zerohedge.com

Stocks Soar Then Slide Following Epic Pension Buying Fake OutIt almost went according to plan.

In what was a relatively quiet market until 2pm suddenly the Dow Jones blasted higher, supported by a burst of massive buy programs, when as noted earlier we observed the highest TICK print on record, and at 2:39pm, the number of NYSE upticks surpassed downticks by a record 1,775...

[url=][/url]

... and not just one massive buy program, but we got no less than three 1,650+ TICK prints in a space of 10 minutes as one trader tried to fake the arrival of a pension bid as other traders scrambled to figure out if pension buying had indeed returned for the third day in a row.

[url=][/url]

This was good enough to fool the algos and mom and pop investors who were trading along, and successfully pushed the Dow Jones more than 200 points higher around 3pm but... there was just one problem because whoever was desperate to pretend they were a pension fund forgot to sell bonds and with the S&P trading at session highs, treasurys remained unchanged...

[url=][/url]

...in stark contrast with yesterday's true pension reallocation, which saw TSY yields slide as stocks jumped.

[url=][/url]

And once traders realized that this was just one giant fake out meant to force stops and squeeze shorts, they started buying... bonds, with the 10Y yield sliding as low as 2.7146%, the lowest since February 2018. And as the bond were bid, stocks tumbled losing all intraday gains, and turning negative.

[url=][/url]

Meanwhile, as it became clear that no real pension bid was coming, the selling returned, and stocks closed near session lows, with the Dow losing almost 400 points of gains and briefly dropping below 23,000 although the selloff was far more controlled than the liquidation puke observed on Monday.

[url=][/url]

At the end of the day, the Dow was the biggest loser, the S&P was modestly lower, while the Nasdaq closed just green thanks to a strong bid for the FANGs:

[url=][/url]

Back to Treasurys, where buying across the curve was not uniform, and while 30Y yields were almost unchanged, the short end crumbled, resulting in a sharp curve steepening.

[url=][/url]

Another confirmation that there was no real pension bid today, the dollar not only did not slide as it did yesterday, but was mostly unchanged if slightly higher on the day.

[url=][/url]

Meanwhile, despite the unchanged inventory print in today's DOE report (vs expectations of a 3+ MM drawdown) and yesterday's API inventory build, oil rose modestly cementing December's 11% plunge for the commodity, and the worst quarterly drop since 2014.

[url=][/url]

With the dollar going nowhere, gold and silver were mostly unchanged, and as a result have enjoyed one of the best months for the precious metals in years.

[url=][/url]

Meanwhile credit, as we noted earlier, did not buy either the Wednesday record point surge, or Thursday's biggest intraday reversal since 2010, and instead investment-grade bond spreads widened 3 basis points to 171bps, having widened every day since Dec. 14 and most trading sessions this quarter while junk bond also dropped as the high yield index widened 1 basis point to 531 basis points, the highest level since Aug. 4, 2016.

[url=][/url]

The average junk bond yield now above 8% for the first time since April 2016.

[url=][/url]

Finally, in what may be the biggest unspoken story of the day, the LSTA leveraged loan index tumbled to new multi-year lows: as shown below, the price of leveraged loans has been a one way train down, which together with another week of record outflows from the loan market, is the most ominous signal because should the loan market freeze up, 2019 will be nothing short of a credit disaster as billions of M&A and LBO deals lock up.

[url=][/url]