SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe Hartenbower who wrote (29922)1/17/1998 9:22:00 PM
From: Wildcat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
Hi Joe,

If I am at a restaurant with a prospective client and the conversation goes that way then I ask the waitress for the chit.

Wildcat



To: Joe Hartenbower who wrote (29922)1/17/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: knight  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 35569
 
<<Hey Larry, why the fixation on C.L. He didn't cause the stock to go down.>>

Jeez, ya got that right Joe. CL was part of the "pump up".



To: Joe Hartenbower who wrote (29922)1/17/1998 10:19:00 PM
From: go4it  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Joe,

I've never been one for blaming others for my decisions but Larry is right on this one. The transfer of money from IPM to Namibian copper and MGAU appears to be an absolutely horrible mistake. I don't know who it was I was talking to but I was boiling mad when I saw that and I told them if I wanted to own shares in these two companies then I would have bought them myself. If IPM was a money producing company and wished to make acquistions of these two companies then that is a different story.

Doyle is good at what he does but to date the IPM share holders are the ones paying the price for it. If I am mistaken then I am all ears to know why. I am quickly reaching my point of intolerance now with no results and an ailing share price. It is time for them to show me exactly what they are doing with my money and how it will pay off.