SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145189)1/6/2019 12:15:35 PM
From: Joseph Silent1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bruiser98

  Respond to of 217654
 
But a big difference is that Great Britain made everyone British subjects with British passports

I don't know if this is true, but I suspect it is not. For example when part of S Asia (India? Burma?) was under the Queen's fat thumb, they were not citizens. And also, though this is not widely understood, there is the notion of a first-class citizen and a second-class citizen.

For example, when a US citizen of Asian origin is given an aggressive finger by a threatening face outside her car window (she was alone in the driver's seat) after she had just voted at the November elections, she is given to understand that she is a second class citizen. I did not witness it but heard about it from a friend of hers.

I have stopped to chase after facts. Because, strangely enough for a world teeming with smarts and technology, facts are becoming increasingly difficult to verify. It's almost a paradox. Instead of running about trying to fill my head with things (which is getting to more and more be an international pastime), I focus on my experience, a smaller world, and more detailed and relevant things. My capacity is small and is better at certain creative things and detail than at information gathering. I think.

The increased information-flow and interaction between East and West is running up against things few people understand well. Beneath everything --- in the subconscous --- lie instructions that govern people's actions. These are complex and informed by such things as religion and family. Just to give one example. In the West religion has always had a moral inflection. God is personalized, "good" and is the "source" of all the energy we think we know. In the East, God is impersonal, neutral and simply the manifestation of the energy we know and do not know. [For example, the phrase "virtous Victorian values" reveals the belief in "good" and "ethical", and (I believe) comes out of a religiously informed Western ground].

And we must thus ask ..... how can humanity expect the small minds of beings like Trump and Xi to actually solve deep problems between peoples?

This is why each short-sighted "we gotta have this to be re-elected" solution may bring at least two new and unforeseen problems. But, because time is large, this will be hard to see.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145189)1/8/2019 3:36:37 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217654
 
Am wondering, if team china did as wsj claims w/r to Malaysia / 1MDB, in league w/ Goldman Sachs, then what else are the two of the same cabal working on?

zerohedge.com

Explosive WSJ Report Exposes China's Role In 1MDB ScandalIn the waning months of his administration, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak was desperate to stave off the bankruptcy of1MDB, the sovereign wealth fund that Razak and members of his inner circle looted (allegedly with the help of Goldman Sachs). So, he turned to an unlikely source of funding to bail out the fund - signing away rights to some of his country's most valuable resources in the process.

[url=][/url]

The source? China. Employing financier Jho Low as an intermediary, Razak worked out an arrangement with the Chinese government whereby Razak's government would grant state-owned Chinese enterprises lucrative stakes in Malaysian railway and pipelines projects in exchange for $34 billion - more than enough to clear the shortfall in 1MDB, and then some.

By 2016, Mr. Najib was in a bind because the fund had borrowed $13 billion it couldn’t repay. He turned to Jho Low—a Malaysian financier the U.S. Justice Department has alleged was the mastermind of a multibillion-dollar theft of 1MDB funds—to negotiate with China to resolve the crisis, according to current and former Malaysian officials.

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Razak offered the Chinese an invaluable cherry on top of the sweetheart deal. Permission to dock Chinese Navy ships in two Malaysian ports - a "significant concession" that would push Malaysia undeniably into the orbit of Beijing.

Mr. Najib also embarked on secret talks with China’s leadership to let Chinese navy ships dock at two Malaysian ports, say two people familiar with the discussions. Such permission would have been a significant concession to Beijing, which seeks greater influence across contested waters of the South China Sea, but it didn’t come to pass.

The projects - and the port permissions - were swiftly incorporated into China's ambitious "One Belt, One Road" initiative - a series of infrastructure projects across Europe, Asia and Africa to fill in gaps in railway and pipeline infrastructure (and help cement China's influence across the developing world).

The WSJ, which cited documents and minutes from meetings between Malaysian and Chinese officials in its report, described the projects as one of the most egregious examples of what China's critics have derided as "debt trap diplomacy" - extending credit to desperate countries in exchange for rights to key strategic resources that can be applied to BRI.

[url=][/url]

US national security officials who spoke with WSJ on the condition of anonymity described the Malaysia deal as one of China's most ambitious attempts to leverage state-backed financing to cement its geostrategic advantage.

A Journal examination of the China-Malaysia projects, based on documents and interviews with current and former Malaysian officials, offers one of the most detailed accounts to date of the political forces at work behind China’s Belt and Road program, a signature initiative of building ports, railways, roads and pipelines in some 70 countries to generate trade and business for Chinese companies.

U.S. officials say China is using the program to increase its sway over developing nations and trap them in debt while advancing its military aims. Several countries, including Pakistan and the Maldives, have been reviewing One Belt, One Road projects amid allegations some deals unfairly advanced Beijing’s interests.

What's more, minutes from the meetings revealed that China and Razak tried to cover up the prime minister's intentions, saying the deals must be portrayed as "market-driven" instead of "political" in nature.

The minutes also revealed that the projects were a fount of corruption, with valuations of the deals priced at above-market rates so that some of the money could be diverted for "other needs."

By 2017, the money had already started flowing through China's Export-Import Bank and into the coffers of 1MDB.

Documents reviewed by the Journal show Malaysian officials suggested that some of the infrastructure projects be financed at above-market values, generating excess cash for other needs. Investigators from the current Malaysian government, which replaced Mr. Najib’s last year, believe some of the money helped Mr. Najib finance his political activities and cover maturing debts of 1MDB, a fund he set up in 2009 to finance local development.

Mr. Najib was aware of the 2016 Malaysian-Chinese meetings, according to people familiar with them. Asked about them, the former prime minister issued a statement saying the rail project would have brought tens of thousands of jobs to Malaysia and stating that under his leadership, the country experienced nine years of continuous economic growth.

[...]

A month later, the Malaysians proposed that Chinese state companies instead make payments that would “indirectly be used to repay 1MDB debt,” according to meeting minutes.

Notes of a discussion on Sept. 22, 2016, say the sides agreed to move ahead with the infrastructure deals even though “they may not have strong project financials.”

Participants needn’t “waste time studying the actual project financials to see if they can sustain the debt etc.,” because Malaysia’s government backed the deals for strategic reasons, the documents say.

Notes from that meeting said Malaysia was working to enhance bilateral ties, citing support Mr. Najib voiced for China’s position in the South China Sea during a regional summit in Laos.

Two months later, Mr. Najib went to Beijing and signed the deals. Together with other projects, they made Malaysia the second-biggest recipient of One Belt, One Road funding after Pakistan.

Money was flowing by the middle of 2017 as the Export-Import Bank of China issued the first loans. By fall the bank had paid out 80% of the $2.5 billion pledged to state-owned China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau to build the pipeline, although little work had been done, according to Malaysian officials.

The story shed some light on one of the enduring mysteries of the 1DB scandal: how Low has managed to evade US and Malaysian prosecutors. Per WSJ, he has been hiding out in China under Beijing's protection.

In another interesting detail, WSJ reportedly confirmed that the Chinese government had ordered increased surveillance of WSJ's reporters in Hong Kong who were working on the story.

At a meeting the next day, Sun Lijun, then head of China’s domestic-security force, confirmed that China’s government was surveilling the Journal in Hong Kong at Malaysia’s request, including “full scale residence/office/device tapping, computer/phone/web data retrieval, and full operational surveillance,” according to a Malaysian summary of that meeting.

China worked hard on behalf of Razak during his reelection campaign. But it wasn't enough, and instead former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamed, who is in his 90s, prevailed. He is now struggling to renegotiate Razak's deals with the Chinese. Meanwhile, Razak is facing corruption charges and will likely head to trial later this year. And Mahathir is struggling to renegotiate some of his predecessors deals.

In summary, one of the biggest financial frauds in Asian history was facilitated with the cooperation of the Chinese Communist Party and Goldman Sachs.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145189)1/8/2019 5:09:49 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217654
 
Am also pondering why the folks who argue for universal gun ownership might shy away from galactic hypersonic deployment?

Maybe they are for all nations having hypersonics

zerohedge.com

Hypersonic Weapons Pose "Significant Challenge To World Peace": ExpertRussian President Vladimir Putin said last month his military would deploy its first hypersonic nuclear-capable missiles in 2019, saying the acquisition of such technology has elevated his country into a new era of high-speed weapons that can outmatch the most advanced missile defense systems in the world.

"From next year, 2019, Russia's armed forces will get the new intercontinental strategic system Avangard ... It's a big moment in the life of the armed forces and in the life of the country. Russia has obtained a new type of strategic weapon," Putin said.

With the immient deployment of hypersonic weapons capable of 20,000 mph will present significant arms control “challenges” as the world moves further into a new and unsettling geopolitical phase, a defense expert has warned.

[url=][/url]

The issue was also mentioned by the International Institute for Strategic Studies' (IISS) Strategic Survey 2018 report, edited by Dr. Nicholas Redman and published in November. It warned that a hypersonic missile traveling at the speed Putin claimed (20,000 mph) would be capable of striking London - about 1,500 miles away from Moscow - in less than five minutes.

Speaking to Express.co.uk, IISS’s senior fellow for military aerospace Douglas Barrie said he was skeptical Putin would be able to deploy his system this year

But he said: “Hypersonic glide vehicles and hypersonic cruise missiles are still only in development – although operational deployment of hypersonic glide vehicles may be only a couple of years away."

“These weapons won’t change the way war is waged – but they will cut down on the time taken to get to a target, and the decision time for any attempt to engage or otherwise respond.”

[url=][/url]

He added: “Russia, China and the USA are all actively pursuing hypersonic glide vehicles and hypersonic propulsion. Most of the work is classified."

“Intercepting hypersonic cruise missiles is demanding but not impossible," however, the NATO missile defense system would have much difficulty intercepting a hypersonic glide vehicle from Russia.

In the IISS’s Strategic Survey last year, the think tank’s director-general Dr. John Chipman warned that Russia and China were waging a parallel campaign of “tolerance warfare” against the West.

Chipman explained: "Tolerance warfare is the effort to push back lines of resistance, probe weaknesses, assert rights unilaterally, break rules, establish new facts on the ground, strip others of initiative and gain systematic advantage over hesitant opponents."

“It particularly exploits weaknesses in Western democracies whose instincts for statecraft have been tempered by geopolitical failure abroad and constraints imposed by domestic opinion on hard-power international deployment," he added

[url=][/url]

“It is becoming a favored strategy for those countries that cannot easily challenge their biggest rivals symmetrically."

"Most obviously, President Vladimir Putin’s Russia is seeking asymmetrically to gain advantage in its weakened position by regular use of tolerance-warfare stratagems."

Hypersonic weapons have moved the world into a new and unsettling geopolitical phase. It is not just a unipolar world, but now, more of a multipolar distribution of power, thanks to rising military forces in Russia and China.

[url=][/url]

The so-called New World Order and Washington Consensus thinking is deteriorating. This creates new risks and uncertainties: rising military tensions, economic disruptions, and destabilizing feedback loops between changing international relations and countries’ domestic political conditions.

Hypersonic technologies are in the beginning stages of allowing countries to break free from the New World Order and Washington control, the world is evolving, and in this transition phase, the world is going to get a whole lot more dangerous.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145189)1/8/2019 5:14:34 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217654
 
Am guessing that the arms & legs know-it-all’s assume that if all folks created equal, then more better than less, and given so, all productivity would converge, and if such, then ...

Let’s see if the flawed theory has running legs as well as waving arms.

bloomberg.com

These Could Be the World's Biggest Economies by 2030By
Enda Curran

January 8, 2019, 4:54 PM GMT+8



Photographer: Udit Kulshrestha/Bloomberg

Seven of the world’s top 10 economies by 2030 will likely be current emerging markets.

The prediction for a shake-up of the world’s gross domestic product rankings comes in new long-term forecasts by Standard Chartered Plc, which includes a projection for China to become the largest economy by 2020, using purchasing power parity exchange rates and nominal GDP.

India will likely be larger than the U.S. in the same time period while Indonesia will break into the top 5 economies.

Rising Stars?Top 10 countries by nominal GDP using PPP exchange rates by the year 2030

Source: Standard Chartered

Note: Estimates are in trillions of international dollars, using purchasing power parity measures

"Our long-term growth forecasts are underpinned by one key principle: countries’ share of world GDP should eventually converge with their share of the world’s population, driven by the convergence of per-capita GDP between advanced and emerging economies," Standard Chartered economists led by David Mann wrote in a note.

They project trend growth for India to accelerate to 7.8 percent by the 2020s while China’s will moderate to 5 percent by 2030 reflecting a natural slowdown given the economy’s size.

Asia’s share of global GDP, which rose to 28 percent last year from 20 percent in 2010, will likely reach 35 percent by 2030 -- matching that of the euro area and U.S. combined.

Here are some other findings from Standard Chartered’s economists:

Waning reform momentum in emerging markets weighs on productivity growthThe end of the quantitative easing era may mean more pressure on economies to reform and revive productivity trendsThe middle-class is at a tipping point, with a majority of the world’s population entering that income group by 2020Middle-class growth driven by urbanization and education should help counter the effects of the rapid population aging trend in many economies, including China



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145189)4/12/2019 3:46:57 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217654
 
following to to this Message 31965283 earlier watch & brief, appears team Malaysia is okay w/ team China after all said and done, disappointing the Neo-con / Neo-lib deep-state and engaging w/ the returning sovereign

in view of the bad luck team Malaysia has had w/ Boeings, the team can now look forward to high-speed rail to replace troublesome planes, and given Malaysia's sunshine that eliminates enough germs, and team China's way to grid and god-parity for solar electricity conversion, near-free travel might be tee-ed up

slop near-free travel with huawei 5G enabling, would say Malaysia has much to look forward to

am wondering how many sneakers equal a train system?

scmp.com

Malaysia to go ahead with China-backed East Coast Rail linkPrime Minister Mahathir Mohamad’s office says first two phases of the project will now cost US$10.7 billion – about two thirds of the original cost The project stalled when Mahathir came to power last year and questioned various Chinese-backed projects signed up to by his predecessor Najib Razak
Bhavan Jaipragas



The prime minister’s long-time confidante Daim Zainuddin, acting as special envoy to the leader, was in Beijing to conclude negotiations.

In a press conference after the government announcement, Daim said the rail link’s length would be reduced by 40 kilometres to 648 kilometres. The cost of building each kilometre of the line dropping to 68 million ringgit from 98 million ringgit, the former finance minister said.

Mahathir is scheduled to hold a press conference on the deal on Monday.

The rail link is a political hot potato for the prime minister, and Friday’s agreement is likely to ease growing pressures on his administration to deliver on election promises as its one-year anniversary nears.

SUBSCRIBE TO This Week in Asia

Get updates direct to your inbox

Long time Malaysian politics observer Oh Ei Sun said the deal had to be welcomed as the country was “in dire need” of fresh foreign direct investment. “In that sense, China is probably the own game in town in terms of future investments as the US increasingly is looking inward while Japan and Europe are yet to pick up their own slack,” said Oh, a senior fellow of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs.



Malaysia’s government adviser Daim Zainuddin is in Beijing to finalise the future of the troubled East Coast Rail Link. He is pictured with China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi in 2018. Photo: AFP

Soon after ousting one-time protégé Najib Razak in elections last May, Mahathir suspended work on the project citing an urgent need to renegotiate “unfair” terms his predecessor had agreed with the main contractor China Communication Construction Company (CCCC).

The government later veered towards cancelling the project but balked when it was faced with a huge cancellation fee.

Insiders say that complicating matters was the Chinese government’s reticence to see the end of a multi billion ringgit project seen as a cornerstone of President Xi Jinping’s
Belt and Road Initiative
.

“Government-to-government” talks – with Daim helming Malaysia’s team of negotiators – have been ongoing for months. Malaysia Rail Link, the Malaysian holding company that owns the project, is a wholly owned entity of the country’s finance ministry, and CCCC too is a state-owned firm.

Mahathir’s administration had said that based on its independent computations the total cost of the rail link linking the port of Klang to the country’s rural east would balloon to over 130 billion ringgit (US$32 billion).



Malaysia’s former prime minster, Najib Razak, at the launch of the East Coast Rail Link. Photo: AP

Malaysian officials have given out mixed signals regarding the protracted negotiations.

At one point Mahathir’s economic affairs minister Azmin Ali said the project had been cancelled outright. The government later issued a “gag order” on officials, authorising only Mahathir to comment on negotiations.

The ECRL is the biggest of the China-backed infrastructure projects to have been cast into doubt by Mahathir, who questions the need for the rail link as well as its cost, and claims his scandal-haunted predecessor signed up in a blasé fashion.

Allies of Mahathir have claimed Najib signed up to the deals as a quid pro quo to Chinese firms that were bailing out massive losses at the
1MDB
state fund, a scandal for which he is currently facing criminal charges.

Najib, who denies wrongdoing, claims to have endorsed the ECRL deal solely because it made good economic sense.

Apart from the ECRL, Mahathir’s government last year cancelled two China-backed pipelines costing 9.3 billion ringgit after it discovered that, while 90 per cent of the project’s costs had been paid, only 13 per cent of it had been completed.