SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (1673)1/7/2019 11:27:54 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13798
 
TJ fan of Zero Hedge does not publish one

How China Colonized An Entire Continent Without Firing A Single Shot



by Tyler Durden
Sun, 01/06/2019 - 07:55

Back in 1885, to much fanfare, the General Act of the Berlin Conference launched the Scramble for Africa which saw the partition of the continent, formerly a loose aggregation of various tribes, into the countries that currently make up the southern continent, by the dominant superpowers (all of them European) of the day. Subsequently Africa was pillaged, plundered, and in most places, left for dead. The fact that a credit system reliant on petrodollars never managed to take hold only precipitated the "developed world" disappointment with Africa, no matter what various enlightened, humanitarian singer/writer/poet/visionaries claimed otherwise.

And so the continent languished.... until 2012 when what we then dubbed as the "Beijing Conference" quietly took place, and to which only Goldman Sachs, which too has been quietly but very aggressively expanding in Africa, was invited.

As the map below, which we first showed in 2012, in just two years after 2010 China had pledged over $100 billion to develop commercial projects in Africa, a period in which the continent had effectively become de facto Chinese province, unchallenged by any developed nation which in the aftermath of the financial crisis had enough chaos at home to bother with what China may be doing in Africa.


[url=][/url]

Since then China's financial colonization of Africa has only accelerated, and according to a study by the China-Africa Research Initiative at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, China had lent a total of $143 billion to 56 African nations facilitated principally by the Export-Import Bank of China and the China Development Bank. By sector, close to a third of loans were directed toward financing transport projects, a quarter toward power and 15% earmarked for resource mining including hydrocarbon extraction. Just 1.6% of Chinese loans were dedicated to the education, healthcare, environment, food and humanitarian sectors combined, confirming that all China interested in was building a giant commodity/trade/military hub.

[url=][/url]

Trending Articles

'Trade War = War' - Some Confucian Calm, Please!The United States and China look like two punch-drunk prizefighters squaring off for a major championship fight. They…



Powered By

Just seven countries – the strategically important Angola, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Kenya, Republic of the Congo, Sudan and Zambia – accounted for two thirds of total cumulative borrowing in 2017 from China, with oil-rich Angola alone representing a 30% share, or $43 billion (35% of Angolan 2017 GDP). Ultimately, Angola reached a loans-for-oil settlement, with Beijing tying the country's future oil production to shipments to China in order to service the country's burgeoning infrastructure debt. According to an April 2018 IMF study, as of the end of 2017, about 40% of low-income Sub-Saharan African countries are now in debt distress or assessed as being at high risk of debt distress including Ethiopia, the Republic of the Congo and Zambia.

Amusingly, in a September 2018 speech to the triennial Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in Beijing, President Xi Jinping said Chinese investment came “with no strings attached” and pledged a further $ 60 billion of loans for African infrastructure development over the next three years. As it turns out, Xi was only joking because as we reported last month, China was set to take over Kenya's lucrative Mombassa port if Kenya Railways Corporation defaults on its loan from the Exim Bank of China. The China-built, China-funded standard gauge railway, also known as the Madaraka Express, was plagued by cost overruns, and outside observers questioned its economic viability, but China was not worried: after all, if the 80%-China funded project failed, Beijing would have full recourse. Call it a "debt-for-sovereignty" exchange.

It's not just Kenya and Angola: other notable examples of China's debt-funded colonization endgame include Sri Lanka, where difficulties servicing $8 billion of infrastructure-related borrowing from China led to the handing over of a controlling equity stake and a 99-year operating lease for the country's second-largest port at Hambantota to a subsidiary of a Chinese state-owned
enterprise in December 2017. For Pakistan, more than 90% of revenues generated at the newly developed Gwadar Port at the mouth of the strategically significant Gulf of Oman are collected by the Chinese operator.

And so, as more developing, peripheral countries default on Chinese loans and are forced to hand over the keys to key sovereign projects to Beijing, China will slowly but surely "colonize" not just Africa but many of the Asian nations in the "Belt and Road Initiative" following a popular playbook developed by none other than the original " economic hitmen"...



To: Snowshoe who wrote (1673)1/7/2019 11:50:03 AM
From: Elroy Jetson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GPS Info

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13798
 
External Chinese Dollar Debt has been borrowed by the Hong Kong and Singapore subsidiaries of Chinese companies with significant Dollar borrowing by Chinese municipalities.

Dollar denominated debt was issued domestically in China, lent by individuals and companies who had earned Dollars. When that supply of US Dollars tapped out when China imposed currency controls, China turned to the residents of Hong Kong and Singapore with Dollar savings to lend. Remember the Hong Kong Dollar is pegged to the US Dollar.

No banks or nations have made any US Dollar loans to China because it's too risky. But Chinese residents of Hong Kong and Singapore have been more trusting

Jay Chen has repeatedly posted his family's purchasing Chinese bonds denominated in US Dollars from their personal savings, having listed some of the various Dollar denominated bonds his family has purchased offering very attractive yields.

On the surface the returns are wondrous with yields on Chinese below-investment-grade borrowers having reached 4-year highs. Last week, Times China Holdings Ltd. and Hengda Real Estate Group Co. both priced two-year dollar offerings at an eye-wateringly high rate of 11 percent !

The problem is the value of the Chinese Yuan has fallen 6% while the Chinese economy has gone slack.
The "Financial Times" reported that 385 billion yuan ($55 billion) of local-currency debt and $15 billion of dollar debt will come due next year for Chinese property developers. Far more Dollar debt will need to be rolled-over in other industries.

For example, a $100 million bond paying an 8 percent coupon cost a Chinese company 52.8 million yuan in annual interest when the USD–CNY exchange rate was 6.6. Now with the Yuan down by 6 percent against the US Dollar, the annual interest cost has increased by 3 million yuan to almost 56 million yuan per year.

If the Yuan falls further against the Dollar it will be even harder for the Chinese government, municipalities, and companies to repay this Dollar debt to the wealthy and Middle Class lenders in Honk Kong and Singapore.

I've previously suggested to Jay it is likely at some point China will no longer be able to support the Hong Kong Dollar peg and Hong Kong assets will be forced into the Yuan currency. It's looking ever more likely with each passing month. Jay became increasing short-tempered with these "anti-Chinese" comments.

Effectively China has indirectly funded the Belt and Suspenders loans to Third World nations by hoovering up the savings of Chinese residents of Hong Kong and Singapore. These borrowers may not be repaid, or may be repaid in rapidly depreciating Yuan equivalent - effectively "nationalizing" their savings for the greater good of the Chinese communist state.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (1673)1/8/2019 5:51:23 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13798
 
US Treasury Department has regularly, though with less fanfare, criticized the World Bank, for allowing relatively well-off countries like China to borrow from the development lender.

As Trump and his trade team have focused on aggressive trade negotiations, especially with China, the US Treasury Department has regularly, though with less fanfare, criticized the World Bank, for allowing relatively well-off countries like China to borrow from the development lender.

In one of Kim's signature achievements he led negotiations to convince shareholders -- especially Washington -- to agree early last year to a "historic" $13 billion increase in the bank's lending capacity.

That deal, reached under the specter of a US veto, included an reform agreement that middle income economies like China would graduate and pay more to borrow from the bank.

World Bank chief resaigned abruptly yesterday

exit could give Trump lever over development lending
news.yahoo.com



To: Snowshoe who wrote (1673)1/10/2019 12:32:10 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13798
 
“We must end the World Bank’s lending to China, especially at a time when Beijing itself is saddling developing countries with predatory debt on unfair terms. Growing the Chinese economy is not the World Bank’s job,” said Brad Sherman, D-Calif., a member of the House Financial Services and Foreign Affairs committees.

China still borrows billions in low-cost loans from World Bank, as Trump administration pushes back
cnbc.com



To: Snowshoe who wrote (1673)1/15/2019 1:31:40 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13798
 
China sentenced a Canadian man to death in the latest escalation of the countries' feud over Huawei

yesterday at 4:47 PM

A court in Dalian, China, sentenced a 36-year-old Canadian man to death on charges of international drug trafficking on Monday.Robert Lloyd Schellenberg was detained in China in 2014 and sentenced to 15 years last November, before a Chinese court said his sentence was too lenient and retried him.The death sentence comes a month into China and Canada's diplomatic feud over Ottawa's arrest and detention of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou.Schellenberg says he was framed.A Chinese court sentenced a Canadian man to death on charges of drug smuggling on Monday in the latest escalation of Beijing and Ottawa's diplomatic feud over the detention of Chinese tech giant Huawei's CFO.

The Dalian Intermediate People's Court in Liaoning, a province in northeastern China, handed down Robert Lloyd Schoenberg's judgment at his retrial on Monday, it said in a statement on its website.

Schellenberg, 36, was detained in China in 2014. He was sentenced to 15 years in prison on charges of smuggling drugs last November. Schellenberg says he is innocent.

In late December, a Dalian court bolstered his charge to international drug trafficking, deemed his punishment to be too light, and called for a retrial.

Chinese prosecutors accused Schellenberg of trying to smuggle 222 kg of methamphetamine in a car tire liner from China to Australia, and listed a series of phone conversations implicating him.

Schellenberg says he was framed.

He told the court on Monday, according to Globe and Mail China correspondent Nathan VanderKlippe: "I am not a drug smuggler. I am not a drug user. I am a normal person."

The maximum penalty for international drug trafficking in China is the death sentence.

Schellenberg's December hearing came three weeks into a diplomatic feud between China and Canada over the arrest and detention of Meng Wanzhou, the CFO of Huawei and daughter of the company's founder.

Canada made the arrest at the US' request. Meng is suspected of violating US sanctions on Iran, and of misleading banks and investors regarding a second company sold to Iran.

Canada briefly detained Meng before allowing her to await extradition to the US in a multi-million dollar home she owns in the country.

Since Meng's arrest, China detained two more Canadians , former diplomat Michael Kovrig and entrepreneur Michael Spavor, on vague claims that they threaten Chinese national security.

Experts have directly linked these cases to China's Huawei dispute.

Donald Clarke, a China law expert at the George Washington University Law School, described the Canadian detainees including Schellenberg as "hostages."

He wrote on Lawfare last Friday that Schellenberg's "case appears to reinforce the message, previously suggested by the detentions of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, that China views the holding of human hostages as an acceptable way to conduct diplomacy."

Lauri Nelson-Jones, Schellenberg's aunt, told The Globe and Mail ahead of Monday's retrial: "There's no way they are not using him as a pawn."

"That's someone's kid. That's someone's brother and nephew," she added. "And to just say: 'We're going to think about ending his life now over this' it's not warranted. It's not deserved. It's heartbreaking."

China's ambassador to Canada, Lu Shaye, accused Ottawa of exhibiting " Western egotism and white supremacy " in the case of Meng's arrest last week.