Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1108894)	1/8/2019 9:33:46 AM
From: ryanaka	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580006

So many crackpot experts. You can't decide scientific truth or solution to an extremely complicated math problem by the popularity contest. If you are a PhD in math, can you argue on a problem in biology with the researcher studying the very problem for a long time? You can't. Usually your opponent is right and you are wrong. It is not your domain of expertise. If you are a marketing person, can you design a sky scraper and build it? What a nonsense fuck is going on right now between the right wing crackpot experts and the genuine experts. If you yourself is not the researcher or expert in the very area, the only thing for you to do is to know whom to listen to. Apply general and sound scientific judgement and learn from hi. Right now the debate is between those who have done lifetime of work and the high school grads who flunked out from many STEM classes and have no fucking idea what a rigorous scientific investigation entails. IF YOU ARE NOT AN ARCHITECT, DO NOT DESIGN AND BUILD A SKY SCRAPER FOR YOUR FAMILY TO LIVE IN. YOU FUCKING LEARN TO LISTEN TO THE RIGHT PEOPLE. NOT THE RIGHT WING CRACKPOT EXPERTS.

To: maceng2 who wrote (1108894)	1/8/2019 10:39:58 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	1 Recommendation Recommended By maceng2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580006

As you look at the absorption, notice that at the 2350 wave number CO2 spike H20 also absorbs. H2O has maybe a 5% absorption probability. Now consider at a dew point of 70F the H20 multiple over CO2 is 63.8. There are 63.8 H20 molecules for every CO2. Suggesting even at the 2350 wave number ever photon is 3 times more likely to be absorbed by a H20 vs CO2. Below is the image of a spreadsheet showing the ppm relationship of H20 to dew point temp. Also the PPM ratio of H20 to CO2. agwn.homeip.net SpreadSheets/Goff-Gratch-vaporpressure.sxc