Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1109720)	1/11/2019 7:08:34 PM
From: ryanaka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571539

I would say the green house gas lets in more solar energy to the earth than they let out when the reflected energy comes from the earth. The CO2 gas would be a continuous envelope surrounding the earth, while the cloud is disconnected patches. If you have a green house whose cover is all ripped into pieces (like cloud) it wouldn't work so well.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1109720)	1/11/2019 7:39:02 PM
From: James Seagrove	Respond to of 1571539

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1109720)	1/12/2019 2:00:22 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571539

OK and do you realise that those clouds and water vapour have a far more telling effect then Carbon Dioxide on reflected / transmitted, or heat retained regarding our common planet ? Have you made the necessary realization of the role water plays in our IR environment? It's not that hard. Just go out on a clear night and cloudy night, at the same time of year, and measure the temperature, or just feel it. All will be revealed.