Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1109781)	1/12/2019 10:28:59 AM
From: Sdgla	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB maceng2 Respond to of 1571690

It's always been my view that understanding the problem is more then 50% of the solution. Agree and that was the point of my statement re intelligence. The scientific procedure ends the AGW religion. Facts become irrelevant and challenging the false religion becomes heresy.

To: maceng2 who wrote (1109781)	1/12/2019 11:08:41 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571690

"Is science a religion?" Is religion a science? "there are a lot of other variables that might be in play and have yet to be eliminated from the equation" All known variables have been accounted for. What new ones would you like to propose? Study: humans have caused all the global warming since 1950 Posted on 19 April 2016 by dana1981 A new study published in Climate Dynamics has found that humans are responsible for virtually all of the observed global warming since the mid-20th century. It’s not a novel result – in fact, most global warming attribution studies have arrived at the same general result – but this study uses a new approach. The percentage contribution to global warming over the past 50-65 years in two categories: human causes (left) and natural causes (right), from various peer-reviewed studies. The studies are Tett et al. 2000 (T00, dark blue), Meehl et al. 2004 (M04, red), Stone et al. 2007 (S07, green), Lean and Rind 2008 (LR08, purple), Huber and Knutti 2011 (HK11, light blue), Gillett et al. 2012 (G12, orange), Wigley and Santer 2012(WG12, dark green), Jones et al. 2013 (J13, pink), IPCC AR5 (IPCC, light green), and Ribes et al. 2016 (R16, light purple). The numbers are best estimates from each study. Illustration: Dana Nuccitelli skepticalscience.com = Glad You Asked: Ice Ages – What are they and what causes them ... geology.utah.gov = "I remember watching the sad case of the extinction of the cave bears" My memory of past lives isn't as good as yours.