Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Steppe Gold (SPE:V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tango who wrote (487)	1/18/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: brian krause	Respond to of 1248

Went over to the World Wide thread and it seems that some of you guys might be thinking that things are looking up. Even Klass de Rooy in post 323 is optimistic. Got to run so I can't explain how I have been triing to point out the differances between SPE and other companies. I'm sure if you are truly interested you will find them.

To: tango who wrote (487)	1/18/1998 5:41:00 PM
From: Robert Dydo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1248

Thanks for your friendly warning. Unfortunately you have nothing new to add as you use the same arguements as others before you. Of course we know about other companies and thank you for your wisdom but obviously it did not work for you, did it? You can blame Ghana for Golden Rule, Indonesia for Bre-x and Kazakhstan for World Wide or Kazakhstan Goldfields. You got sucked up to "quick buck" scheme which all above were and too bad. The only real warning is you and the message is that your advice has no value as you weren't wise enough for yourself. Take it like a speculator and don't come here and tell us how hurt you are and that Kazakhstan took piece of you. The companies you invested in did and are to blame for it. Compare Steppe to those companies. Tell me what they have in common? Tell me one detail of official contract where we can read what Kazakhstan gets in return from Kazakhstan Goldfields for allowing them to manage their(Kazakhstan's) mines. Bring me something else than what KGFC or CGZ or WWW have published about their particular situation from anywhere stating that Kazakhstan has broken the law? What else is there beyond the fact that you are hurt? Please use your "famous saying" and don't play with s--t as you bound to get it on your hands. Regards Robert

To: tango who wrote (487)	1/18/1998 6:15:00 PM
From: Steve Johnston	Respond to of 1248

You are obviously not a regular reader of this thread. Everyone indeed knows all of what you say. Please read over the last 50 or so posts and you will get a better sense of how the company is positioning itself to minimize this risk. Kazakstan has abundant mineral and energy resources but lacks the capital and knowledge to develop them.. If they ruin all western attempts at moving in to help, then the people of Kazakstan are doomed to exist in perpetual poverty. No government wants this. Regards.