Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1110360)	1/14/2019 12:37:56 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571101

No more games.The data is not being fudged, and the laws of physics aren't being violated. Corbett knows he's spouting lies and you prolly know that he won't correct anything. Perhaps tell him birds and pine beetles are better climate scientists than he is. If you'd like to know about adjustments, Message 30449466 Message 29998441 = CO2’s proportional radiative forcing contribution to the greenhouse effect is just 2.7% A not very interesting variation of "CO2 makes up 390 ppm (0.039%)* of the atmosphere, how can such a small amount be important?" How substances in trace amounts can cause large effects skepticalscience.com "Your children can drink that water, it only contains a trace of arsenic (0.01 ppm is the WHO and US EPA limit)." * On 1/11, that was 409.44 ppm. scripps.ucsd.edu