Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1110399)	1/14/2019 1:10:04 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571039

None of that proves anything, squat, zippo, zilch... Thanks for presenting your very limited incorrect view of Climate Change (AKA Global Warming).

To: maceng2 who wrote (1110399)	1/14/2019 1:23:50 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571039

"Why didn't he use another ink component" Why didn't he smash the bottle against the wall, and say, "There's nothing to see"? "Why do all these climate scientists just ignore water vapour?" They don't. The first scientist to talk about the WVP feedback was Arrhenius, in the same paper in which he became the first scientist to talk about global warming. I'm not sure who was the first to talk about clouds. Svante Arrhenius - Wikipedia , Arrhenius was the first person to predict that emissions of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels and other combustion processes were large enough to cause global warming. In his calculation Arrhenius included the feedback from changes in water vapor as well as latitudinal effects, but he omitted clouds, convection of heat upward in the atmosphere, and other essential factors. l . en.wikipedia.org "It's beyond f**king wierd. It like clouds and water vapour just don't exist." You know what's weird? Deniers pretending climate scientists ignore those factors.