Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LowtherAcademy who wrote (25409)	1/18/1998 12:07:00 PM
From: Angler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

Lew Hardy makes one hell of a good point. Angler

To: LowtherAcademy who wrote (25409)	1/18/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: lostmymoney	Respond to of 41046

Thanks Lew EOM

To: LowtherAcademy who wrote (25409)	1/19/1998 8:17:00 AM
From: VALUESPEC	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 41046

<<I think you are worrying too much about sales at this point.>> Lew, since sales are the name of the game, it think worrying about them is key. It may be a little early to start panicing, yet, but the longer it takes for significant sales to materialize, the higher the risks of your investment in FTEL, IMO, especially if the product is as great as you think. I also think that if LU were to sell a comparable product at a higher cost, one would want to go with LU instead of FTEL. Why? Because one would hate to spend a lot of money on equipment from a small company and then have it go bankrupt. How many small companies have lost contracts, even though substantially cheaper for that reason alone? Also, even if FTEL's product has some advantages today, is LU likely to stay behind FTEL for long? What would the buyers believe? VALUESPEC valuespec.com