Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1110560)	1/15/2019 10:03:44 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579897

As far as I can tell, you don't know shit from shinola about science. I am surprised to hear you say that. However, maybe you are just tired or something. Have a good sleep and think about stuff later. Think about the moon maybe. It orbits the Earth, and yet it rotates exactly once on it's axis for every complete rotation of the Earth. The rotations are coupled and locked by the Earths gravity. Tallbloke's work is independent yet similar in outcome to Zharkova's work. His analysis comes from the centre of gravity of the solar system, the Suns complex rotation on it's axis and around the centre of gravity of the Solar system. Likewise there are very fruitful grounds to finding the relationships between various flows inside the sun and their coupling to the planets moving around the sun. The analysis of the principle magnetic components may well correspond with planetary movements. I have not studied any of the work in detail, but the results so far are very promising and I expect everyone who has an open and functioning scientific mind feels the same way. A cooling period is predicted straight ahead, and like any good scientific theory, the proof is in the pudding. What happens will show who is right. Everyone at the lecture, skeptics and all, accepts this principle... also the principle of robust critique. Why is the IPCC so against the robust critique ? The name calling is pathetic. Hardly draws any respect from moi... lets just leave at that for now. There is no problem, other then governments being receptive to the scientists rather then just the bankers. With intelligent foresight, problems ahead can be mediated. The trouble at the moment is the bankers tell scientists what is happening and then use grants etc to make sure they only do what they are told. Find the science to "prove" CO2 global warming induced by human activity. They just love pushing that one, it's seems to suit their agenda... push the guilt angle. (imho).