Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Taking Advantage of a Sharply Changing Environment -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: isopatch who wrote (1290)	1/16/2019 2:58:39 PM
From: Doug R	1 Recommendation Recommended By Hawkmoon Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6353

isopatch, That's a very good review of the present state of investigation into all of this. Everything is in a state of flux. From the available information to the presentation of that information. On forum.iceagefarmer.com I have a series of posts called "Sorting Through Differences within the GSM Aware Community". Almost all of that work is also scattered through this board but there I was able to put in in one place: forum.iceagefarmer.com Right now I'm working on getting this magnetic pole shift sorted out. I have mostly concluded that maverickstar reloaded is providing good observational data the on movement of magnetic north. His recent videos concerning the orientation of the magnetic anomalies that are producing the observations may be a bit shaky on the interpretive side in one sense though. I'm putting together my thoughts on that today. He believes the two widely separated areas of magnetic intensity are two separate "poles". As per the graphic provided by NASA of what to expect during a pole shift, the idea is not without merit. Maverickstar is of the opinion that the two areas are moving farther apart but it may just be that they are changing in intensity instead with the overall delta weighing more heavily to the Siberian "patch"...or "pole". His graphic used in the recent videos is actually from 2014 so, although it's a valid representation, it's 5 years old. The SWARM mission website contains this quick video of the intensity change which shows how the North Magnetic Dip Pole movement tracked from 2014 to 2016. esa.int The white dot is the dip pole. The intensity changes of the "patches" is rather subtle visually. A screenshot: Maverickstar's data is showing that it's very likely there's now occurring another acceleration since the 2016 acceleration. So when NOAA finally does get to their unscheduled update soon, they could be behind again just as they fell behind soon after their 2015 scheduled update. It's always sumthin,.