Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Excel Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: McNabb Brothers who wrote (2486)	1/18/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: Flan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2806

McNabb I imagine you are still short, nice call - unfortunately I never shorted this dog becuase I do not short stocks but I think the way this company handles touchy accounting issues is hilarious. John J. McLaine, President and Chief Operating Officer commented, ''Over the past several months, our customer base has continued to grow at a rate faster than anticipated by most analysts. We changed our accounting policy in the first quarter of 1997 to fully expense customer acquisition costs in the period incurred, which results in higher marketing service expenses during a period of strong customer growth. The Company also has underway a marketing promotion which will cause acquisition costs per customer to increase by approximately 10% during the fourth quarter.'' The company has decided to fully expense its costs - Well isn't that a honorable thing thing to do. The company has decided to follow GAAP (Generally accepted accounting principles) Rather than ammortize the costs over a long period the company will expense them when incurred and as a result profitability will be hurt. Aggresive accounting always comes back to bite you in the ass. Tele save (TALK) recently did the same thing. They signed an agreement whereby they would pay AOL 50 million to have access to AOL customers. Even though the contract was for 3 years the company chose to amortize the costs over a forty year period. Management said that they felt comfortable doing so because they believed that the contract would be renegotiated for that many years. If they had expensed the costs of this contract for the actual length of the contract the company would have lost a substantial amount of money rather than post profitable figures. Well the SEC eventually stepped in and made them do it correctly but I think it is a joke that company's pull this crap and people just eat it up. ECI is just another case of this type of manipulation.

To: McNabb Brothers who wrote (2486)	1/18/1998 11:27:00 PM
From: Joe Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2806

The thread will live with or without you. I have not been posting anything because there has not been much to post. Obviously I would like to see ECI doing better but I am still patient and I still believe there will be a day when this price will have been a steal. Excel is still a new company and they are still adjusting to marketing circumstances. There biggest reason for lower 4th quarter earnings is can be attributed to there attempt at lower intrastate rates and expecting to get into the local market earlier. There losses are minimal when compared to that of MCI and ATT for the same reasons. The LECs have done a good job of dragging things out in the political and legal system and preventing long distance companies equal access to the local market. They won't be able to prevent it forever and ECI has backed off to wait it out while letting the bigger ATT, MCI, Sprint spend the big bucks fighting the battle. ECI is now concentrating more on long distance with the addition of their new plan for profitable commercial accounts and looking to more international business.