Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Barnabus who wrote (10846)	1/18/1998 12:31:00 PM
From: Alan Markoff	Respond to of 39621

Jack; I wish Emile will divulge to me were his Church is if he is in fact a "preacher". I would love to pay him a visit and sit on some of his sermons. So Emile if you wish to divulge that information I would be happy to pay a visit to your Church if it is not to far from were I am located. Alan

To: Barnabus who wrote (10846)	1/18/1998 12:49:00 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39621

Hi Jack, I was surprised to read this in your post as I think the biases here are very clear. I am not attacking anyone but just was pointing out the amusing ridiculousness of the whole charade. <<Alan, a totally un-biased, Spirit-inspired Jane has exonerated you before the Inquisition court. I concur with her eloquent decision.>> To say there is no bias in Jane's campaign is a whopper! <gg> Come on!! Read this recent declaration of loyalty by Jane! Post #10765 <<It is also the rythym of the posts of the attacks. Viscous attack. A couple more. A sudden softening of posture and a hint of feeling of vague correction or apology. No more than two of those, followed by an even more insane out of the blue attack, and that is what disturbed me. I felt Alan was being assailed by demons more than being instructed in the Holy Spirit, and this could have all been used in the hands of a true saint as St. Francis laboratory for producing a great Jewish saint. BUT NOOOOoooooooooooooooo, we get too anglo-overloads, and I do understand that and rather am proud of my own anglo thing, who truly have received much doctrine from Hitler. My hatred of Hitler is second to my hatred of Stalin. On earth there is no man with more blood dripping off his lips than Stalin. A monster of horrifying magnitude, who many Emile rails about still worship, and this of course grieves me to the core. As I'm sure the Stalin cult of worship is being revived in campuses across America as we speak and as the whole world shifts back into position. But Hitler runs such a close second. Such a bucket of filth he was, and adored by a whole nation of idiot Germans, which I have only within the mellowing years that do us such good have been able to see without a nazi flag in their hands. I agree with Alan on every point. In the first place, re-read Alan and their never was a point. His point was this was hardly the place to find two or three men Jew-bashing openly, and it was becoming that. Again, from Emile's knowledge of some evil, which now is in his mind the only evil, and there is nothing but good non-Jews on earth at this moment in his mind--ALL POTENTIAL NEW COVENANT GENTILE CHRISTIANS OF COURSE. So unbalanced Bob. And now I will confess to you that in Nancy and my email Nancy bemoaned yet another Emile joining the attack on Alan, and how was he going to fight off many more, and I rather agreed, because I thought maybe Emile had actually recruited you and Chris, especially CHris, for some reason, to now join SI and post on Ask God as a casual observer, when actually you both seemed to me to be other neo-nazi doctrine types.>> I think there is plenty of evidence in that post to disqualify the "judge" as being biased against Emile, Chris and maybe even ME! and in favor of Alan & Nancy! So I get branded a possible neo-nazi type because I thought Alan and/or Nancy was wrong about something?! This is so absurd that they should all be ashamed! Bob

To: Barnabus who wrote (10846)	1/18/1998 4:34:00 PM
From: Jane Hafker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39621

Let the Inquisition Tribunal now record that Jack Delamarter, also called by God as son, and Co-Inheritor of the Kingdom of God with Jesus Christ doth find the accused Alan INNOCENT and confirmed a Brother in Christ. The court doth bring the first charge against Emile of Vidrine as creating a new gospel of salvation not found in the scriptures, and accusing the brethren from his fleshly hatreds.. Emile is now charged with violoation of Galatians 1:7-8, and should be found ACCURSED. How does the accused heretick so respond? According to the Rules of the Court of the INquisition, to not respond with scripture clearing the charges marks the accused as clearly guilty, and the sentence is intense silence while the heretick repents. Emile of Vidrine, Supreme Inquisitor, how do you respond to the charges against you?