Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1110890)	1/16/2019 2:43:37 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572900

In reality (as demonstrated by "Climategate") it is a real factor to consider. Some of the actions, words, attitudes of the IPCC has not been scientific. Sorry. That is just how the world is. I used my words carefully. I said I have not seen the evidence to convince me that Carbon Dioxide has a strong interactive effect. Whats wrong with that statement? I am accepting the premise... I just need to understand the evidence or whatever. Maybe I need to explain the word "interaction" a bit more for you. The direct effect of Carbon dioxide is swamped by variations in water vapour. Do you want me to go over that again? Maybe check out the report on the aircraft IR sensors seeing things in the atmosphere I posted earlier.