Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Harvard Scientific (HVSF)Hot$$- male impotency medicine -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gene Voss who wrote (2785)	1/18/1998 2:22:00 PM
From: GrandPohba	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3906

All Rise........ The GrandPohba has arrived!!!!!! To All the "newbies" in this stock: I strongly suggest you go back and read posts made in late March '97 thru about mid May. You will then see for yourselves how many empty promises this company has made. RAP and myself have followed this company longer and more intensely than anybody posting here. We have seen this company lie to and decieve their shareholders over and over again. For those of you who still think this is a great investment, I suggest you buy more shares, while they're cheap. <very big grin> GP

To: Gene Voss who wrote (2785)	1/18/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: Afaq Sarwar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3906

Gene, I would appreciate if you could make comments of these two items: 1. Based on your experience, when is the patent number issued? Is it issued at the time when the Patent Office informs the inventor or the atty. that all claims have been allowed, or when the patent is printed and mailed to the inventor or atty. 2. It is my understanding that the package for MUSE (by VVUS) contains a patent number. This number is 5474535. The patent that you own and is licensed by VVUS is #4801587. This would suggest that VVUS is not relying on your patent for their MUSE product. The infringement claim that VVUS had written to HVSF about in August 1997, is based on the claim no. 6 of your patent. So it would seem that the HVSF product does not infringe upon VVUS product or the patent the product is relying on. What is the significance of this, if any. Afaq Sarwar