SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (396358)1/20/2019 11:19:13 AM
From: Cautious_Optimist4 Recommendations

Recommended By
abuelita
NAG1
Sam
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542836
 
My problem with Gillibrand is that she fell into the zero-tolerance presumed guilty trap with Franken, despite his apology and call for open investigation. I understand that many disagree with me on my criticisms of the me-too movement when it comes to zero-tolerance and trial-by-viral media.

I freely and sincerely acknowledge that we had/have a global and local rape culture and that it is a critical social evolution to move forward and CHANGE THE MEMES.

Clearly Franken's case, launched by a Hannity-ally who herself was pinching men's butts as part of her USO shtick, was worthy of some fairness and justice.

I would vote Kirsten her over any current Republican. Its all relative.



To: JohnM who wrote (396358)1/20/2019 11:43:57 AM
From: Sam1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Wharf Rat

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542836
 
I don't know who Gillibrand is listening to, but her candidacy is a non-starter, especially after what she did to Al Franken. She will not be able to both move far enough to the left to please the Democratic base and far enough to the middle to please moderates. The Rs would have a field day if she turns out to be the candidate. Which she won't, but she is certainly in their prayers.