Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Markoff who wrote (10862)	1/18/1998 7:25:00 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39621

Nancy, <<Bob, I am sorry but I am clueless were you got what you have put as a quote from me. It would help to clear this misunderstanding if you could be accurate and put the exact post or e-mail so I could know what you are refering to. >> In this post of mine to Jack Message 3198064 I said where the quote came from, which is the post Alan chose to respond to and then I responded again and now you are responding. It is Jane's description of you and her conversation via e-mail. If this is not what you said you should take it up with her. << When I told you you had sinned against me and my children I saw no attempt on your part to say that the things mentioned were not your intent and that it was not what you meant. To say that the things on these post are the same as a known neo-nazi that was around shooting at people is the same as what is said here is not judging but stating fact.>> Nancy, I have not sinned against you or your family so there is no need for me to expalin or apologize for anyhting. You still attribute things to me that I did not say or mean. I am not and have never been anything like the evil people you talk about that persecute you. If anything, you owe me an apology for ever considering I may be a neo-nazi just because I said you were in error on the Word. It's so absurd! <<If I were to say what is in your heart and mind when you say things that is judgement, Like saying it is from satanic Talmud implying our motives to be a conspiracy to destroy Christianity. I don't see why it is so hard to say I am sorry if I offended you that was not my intent.>> Once again I never said that or even implied that. I have no need to aplogize for something I never did. If you are offended it is because you don't understand. <<When I said all Israel will be saved I showed you the verse for that statement as you requested and you came back with something that did not at all respond to what I was saying. Have I ever said you do not have to be born again and did I say it then? No!!! You are defensive and are overreacting to what I said you even interpret all Israel being saved to be at some point in the future and I did not say when I felt it would happen and I don't like having to defend every word I say because people are looking for fault without love.>> I did not over react but only responded with the Word to show that what you were implying could not be. Message 3170656 I am not defensive, just contending for a sound doctrine and understanding of the Word. I hope that I will always be able to see the truth regardless of who is saying it. I do not think all Israel will be saved, the Word clearly says it will be the remnant that will be saved. I don't say that to offend, I say it only because the Word clearly says that. Titus 3:9-11 9 "But shun foolish controversies and genealogies and strife and disputes about the Law: for they are unprofitable and worthless. 10 Reject a factious man after a first and second warning, 11 knowing that such a man is perverted and sinning, being self-condemned." I think that we cannot ignore this warning to "shun foolish controversy", this certainly has been the case on this thread for too long. I want to get along with everyone here without having to "choose sides" because there are two camps here. I shouldn't have to either and it is shameful for anyone to imply I am wrong for agreeing with anyone here. I repeat this: While the Church argues among themselves how many souls are lost who possibly could have been reached. There is no profit from these controversies and it only serves the devil to continue it instead of making this a place where the lost can find some hope. Bob