SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145605)1/20/2019 5:38:01 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217865
 
not exactly ...

the 2015 embargo of xeon (used in buildings TianHe I and II) en.wikipedia.org merely expedited team china to rollout own RISC chip that took the tallest building TaiHu en.wikipedia.org in 2016. It turned out that team China anticipated team USA machination and did the right moves per longterm planning and single-minded execution

as far as supercomputers go, petaflops / terapetaflops / etc etc turns out probably important, for the eco system of tech / science, as in best to deploy more, faster, and faster still, but using less energy and tweak and tune on everything else that matters.

all about world peace, hypersonic, ultra hypersonic, etc etc

landing on mars and mining the moon and such may turn out to be important. do not know until somebody gets there, and best not be left too far behind.

...

thus, I suspect, the so-called trade war that is not actually about trinkets, baubles, gadgets, widgets, and gizmos

the trade war is about 2026 / 2032, and what comes after the darkest interregnum, a guess

I hope the electorates everywhere are up to the task of contributing lucre per tax and inflation and debt protocols to underwrite the exercise

all very exciting, and not exactly about arms and legs pole-climbers understand it, but involves such arms and legs, and brains



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145605)1/20/2019 7:09:25 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217865
 
let's see if the British chooses to ban Huawei

and if so, let us then see what happens to its energy equation

a lot of coincidences can happen once the dots are connected

reuters.com

China to help plug UK nuclear power gap as Japanese plans falter

... and

... let's see what 5-eyes Britain chooses to do w/r saving dead German / French ducks

ft.com

Merger meddling
The Siemens-Alstom tie-up is seen an opportunity to create a European ‘Railbus’ able to go toe-to-toe with China’s CRR
January 15, 2019

There is arguably no area where the European Commission has more raw power than in competition policy. It is a hugely important enforcement role that Brussels is supposed to discharge with quasi-judicial solemnity. So when old conventions are tossed aside and politics takes centre stage, it is worth paying attention.

The (often humdrum) weekly meeting of the college of European commissioners on Tuesday promises to be an extraordinary occasion on the competition front. On the agenda in the gathering in Strasbourg is a debate on creating European industrial champions with the clout to take on state-backed Chinese rivals. The big surprise: extending the discussion to include a looming decision on the Siemens-Alstom railway merger, which would otherwise be heading for a veto.

By law, the college has the final say on competition decisions. But, in most cases, to describe it as a rubber stamp would be generous. Merger decisions are usually first taken by the competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager. The Dane and her predecessors of course consult colleagues behind the scenes in sensitive cases, but by the time the matter reaches college level the hard work is done. The result is a formality.

Rarely, if ever, has a formal merger recommendation been overturned. Even mild objections noted in the minutes of college meetings are a rarity (Michel Barnier is responsible for a good many of them). When handing over the post, the late Karel Van Miert joked to his successor Mario Monti: “now you will have to get used to being thought of as Europe’s most powerful man.”

So why is the college being consulted before Ms Vestager takes her decision — and while negotiations with the companies are still open? The first reason is China. France and Germany see the Siemens-Alstom tie-up as an opportunity to create a European “Railbus” able to go toe-to-toe with China’s CRRC, the world’s biggest trainmaker.

CRRC wants to aggressively expand in Europe. The trouble is Ms Vestager doesn’t think the Chinese are coming any time soon. CRRC faces high barriers — related to safety, technical compatibility and market knowledge — to enter what rival Canadian trainmaker Bombardier called the most complex railway market in the world.

The second reason is politics. Alstom and Siemens are Franco-German heavyweights. Their corporate marriage is blessed at the highest levels in Paris and Berlin. Jean-Claude Juncker, the commission president, clearly sees it as deserving of a political discussion.

When a decision is taken in coming weeks the expected outcome — a veto — may well not change. The German and French companies together would have a near monopoly in signalling and high-speed trains in parts of Europe. Approving the merger without further concessions would likely face court challenges. Even Germany’s competition authority wants to see it blocked.

But a veto could give ammunition to critics seeking to overhaul the EU’s competition regime. France has longstanding complaints (Nicolas Sarkozy, the former French president, once grudgingly said: “When competition is useful, I am for it.”) Now China’s power is rapidly changing the outlook of other member states, not least historically pro-competition Germany.

The college discussion may at least shield the commission from the charge that it blindly applied rules without reflecting on strategic or political priorities.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145605)1/20/2019 7:23:55 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217865
 
this is funny

washingtonpost.com

Senators urge Metro to guard against Chinese spying in new subway cars
Robert McCartney

U.S. senators representing the Washington region want Metro to take stronger steps to guard against the risk that buying subway cars from China would allow Beijing to use the vehicles to conduct electronic spying on the nation’s capital.

In a letter to Metro General Manager Paul J. Wiedefeld, the lawmakers say the transit agency should get approval from the Defense Department, Department of Homeland Security and Transportation Department before awarding the contract for its next-generation rail cars to a foreign adversary.

The letter adds pressure on Metro to take more extensive precautions than it has done so far in light of the possibility that the state-owned China Railway Rolling Stock Corp. (CRRC) could win the deal to build up to 800 of Metro’s 8000-series rail cars.

CRRC has used low bids to win four of five large U.S. transit rail car contracts awarded since 2014. The company — which critics say benefits from state subsidies — is expected to be a strong contender for the Metro contract, which is likely to be worth more than $1 billion.

[ Could a Chinese-made Metro car spy on us? Many experts say yes.]

Some analysts say resistance to CRRC in Congress, the Pentagon and the U.S. rail-car industry may force Metro to award the contract to a different company. Doing so would probably lead to legal challenges and cost Metro hundreds of millions of dollars, given CRRC’s bargain prices. No U.S. company makes subway cars, so China competes in that market against companies from Asia, Europe and Canada.

The letter, delivered Friday, was signed by Sens. Mark R. Warner (D) and Tim Kaine (D) of Virginia, and Ben Cardin (D) and Chris Van Hollen (D) of Maryland. Warner is vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Metro’s response was mixed. Wiedefeld issued a brief statement saying the agency was strengthening its protections against cyberespionage, while Metro Board Chairman Jack Evans criticized the senators.

“If indeed the federal government wants us to buy from other vendors at a higher cost, then they need to subsidize the difference,” Evans said. He faulted the federal government for failing to pay part of Metro’s operating costs, when federal workers make up an estimated 40 percent of Metro’s rush-hour ridership.

“I note that the federal government still pays zero, nothing, for Metro on the operating side,” Evans said. “I would instruct the four senators to focus their efforts on getting federal funding for Metro.”

The senators’ letter did not mention China by name, but it was unmistakably aimed at Beijing. The draft of an accompanying news release said the missive aired “safety and security concerns” regarding the possibility that the contract would go “to a Chinese manufacturing company.”

The news release also referred to a Jan. 7 front-page story in The Washington Post reporting concerns that China could install malware in the subway cars’ electronic systems to conduct video surveillance, monitor conversations or cause a crash.

[ Metro cybersecurity audit highlights growing concerns at agencies across the country.]

The Washington region’s senators aren’t the only ones uneasy about the Metro contract. On Jan. 11, Sens. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) wrote Wiedefeld expressing “deep concerns” about CRRC’s efforts “to displace rail manufacturers in the United States.” Crapo and Brown are, respectively, the chairman and ranking Democrat on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, which oversees public transportation.

The apprehensions arise partly from broader disquiet over charges of Chinese, state-sponsored cybertheft of business secrets and hacking of critical U.S. infrastructure such as telecommunications networks.

The local senators’ letter said technologies in the rail cars that are vulnerable to “hacking or other forms of interference” include “automatic train control; network and trainline control; video surveillance; monitoring and diagnostics; and data interface with [Metro].”

It asked several questions aimed at pressing Metro to take precautionary measures, including: “Will Metro consult with the Department of Defense prior to awarding a contract to confirm whether the Department would permit railcars built by certain foreign governments to operate through the Pentagon?” and “Will Metro .?.?. seek the concurrence of USDOT and DHS in its cybersecurity evaluations before making any final contract award?”

Wiedefeld said Metro would respond directly to the senators as soon as possible.

“We recognize the important national security concerns being raised, and we are working to strengthen this procurement and others with new cybersecurity requirements,” Wiedefeld said. “While we have a fiduciary responsibility with all procurements, safety and security is always our first priority.”

In picking the winner of the 8000-series contract, Metro is legally required to follow guidelines it set in a lengthy request for proposals (RFP) it issued in September. The agency said in December that it would revise the specifications in the RFP in light of worries about CRRC. Bids are due April 4.

Metro acted to strengthen its cybersecurity program in the fall by hiring Kyle Malo, a former head of information security at the FBI, as its chief information security officer.

A Japanese company, Kawasaki, is building Metro’s latest series rail car, the 7000 series. But Evans and others said Kawasaki is so busy with a new contract with the New York transit system that it is unlikely to compete aggressively, if at all, for the 8000-series cars.

“It is my understanding that Kawasaki might not be able to bid, leaving us with fewer options,” Evans said.

Other Metro board members had differing reactions to the senators’ letter.

David Horner, who represents the federal government, said he hoped Metro would go further than the senators asked by reviewing whether bidders received financial subsidies “from a non-allied government.” Horner has been airing concerns about CRRC since the fall.

“When procuring critical infrastructure, it is necessary for authorities to understand the extent to which proposers act as the alter egos of our country’s rivals,” Horner said.

Board member Michael Goldman was concerned that Metro was being unfairly singled out given that CRRC already has contracts with transit agencies in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles and Philadelphia. He noted that CRRC has built manufacturing plants in the United States to assemble subway cars, although many of the components are made in China.

“This is a broader national issue,” said Goldman, who represents Maryland. “What’s needed is some broad guidance from the federal government as to what the nature of the problem is, and how transport properties can take steps to protect their infrastructure against cybersecurity intrusions.”

CRRC has not responded to emails requesting comment. However, a Jan. 13 article in the Chinese publication Global Times, which reflects the views of the Beijing government, quoted “a Chinese railway expert” as saying concerns about espionage “are groundless and could delay progress in US rail transportation.”

Faiz Siddiqui contributed to this story.




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145605)1/21/2019 1:06:59 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217865
 
Re fake news, feel more certain that faking of news is not good news ...

... all media platforms are guilty on almost all issues

zerohedge.com

More Fake News Exposed As Media Lies About Catholic Kids, Native American Debacle Authored by Robby Soave via Reason.com,

'Journalists' who uncritically accepted Nathan Phillips' story got this completely wrong...

[url=][/url]

Partial video footage of students from a Catholic high school allegedly harassing a Native American veteran after the anti-abortion March for Life rally in Washington, D.C., on Saturday quickly went viral, provoking widespread condemnation of the kids on social media. Various media figures and Twitter users called for them to be doxed, shamed, or otherwise punished, and school administrators said they would consider expulsion.

But the rest of the video - nearly two hours of additional footage showing what happened before and after the encounter - adds important context that strongly contradicts the media's narrative.


Far from engaging in racially motivated harassment, the group of mostly white, MAGA-hat-wearing male teenagers remained relatively calm and restrained despite being subjected to incessant racist, homophobic, and bigoted verbal abuse by members of the bizarre religious sect Black Hebrew Israelites, who were lurking nearby. The BHI has existed since the late 19th century, and is best describes as a black nationalist cult movement; its members believe they are descendants of the ancient Israelites, and often express condemnation of white people, Christians, and gays. DC-area Black Hebrews are known to spout particularly vile bigotry.

Phillips put himself between the teens and the black nationalists, chanting and drumming as he marched straight into the middle of the group of young people. What followed was several minutes of confusion: The teens couldn't quite decide whether Phillips was on their side or not, but tentatively joined in his chanting. It's not at all clear this was intended as an act of mockery rather than solidarity.

[url=][/url]

One student did not get out of Phillips way as he marched, and gave the man a hard stare and a smile that many have described as creepy. This moment received the most media coverage: The teen has been called the product of a " hate factory" and likened to a school shooter, segregation-era racist, and member of the Klu Klux Klan. I have no idea what he was thinking, but portraying this as an example of obvious, racially-motivated hate is a stretch. Maybe he simply had no idea why this man was drumming in his face, and couldn't quite figure out the best response? It bears repeating that Phillips approached him, not the other way around.

And that's all there is to it. Phillips walked away after several minutes, the Black Hebrew Israelites continued to insult the crowd, and nothing else happened.

You can judge for yourself. Here is video footage of the full incident, from the perspective of the black nationalists.

Phillips enters the picture around the 1:12 mark, but if you skip to that part, you miss an hour of the Black Hebrew Israelites hurling obscenities at the students. They call them crackers, faggots, and pedophiles. At the 1:20 mark (which comes after the Phillips incident) they call one of the few black students the n-word and tell him that his friends are going to murder him and steal his organs. At the 1:25 mark, they complain that "you give faggots rights," which prompted booing from the students. Throughout the video they threaten the kids with violence, and attempt to goad them into attacking first. The students resisted these taunts admirably: They laughed at the hecklers, and they perform a few of their school's sports cheers.

It was at this moment that Phillips, who had attended a nearby peace protest led by indigenous peoples, decided to intervene. He would later tell The Detroit Free Press that the teenagers "were in the process of attacking these four black individuals" and he decided to attempt to de-escalate the situation. He seems profoundly mistaken: The video footage taken by the black nationalists shows no evidence the white teenagers had any intention of attacking. Nevertheless, Phillips characterized the kids as "beasts" and the hate-group members as "their prey":

"There was that moment when I realized I've put myself between beast and prey," Phillips said.

"These young men were beastly and these old black individuals was their prey, and I stood in between them and so they needed their pounds of flesh and they were looking at me for that."

Again, all the evidence suggests that Phillips got it backward.

He also claimed that he heard chants of "build the wall." While I cannot rule out the possibility that some of the kids indeed chanted this—those who were wearing MAGA hats are presumably Trump supporters—I did not hear a single utterance of the phrase in the nearly two hours of video footage I watched. Admittedly, the kids do a lot of chanting and it's not always possible to tell what they are saying. Their stated explanation is that they engaged in a series of school sports chants: That's what one student told a local news reporter. His account largely tracks with the video.

"We are an all-male school that loves to get hyped up," said this student. "And as we have done for years prior, we decided to do some cheers to pass time. In the midst of our cheers, we were approached by a group of adults led by Nathan Phillips, with Phillips beating his drum. They forced their way to the center of our group. We initially thought this was a cultural display since he was beating along to our cheers and so we clapped to the beat."

According to this student, the smiling student was grinning because he was enjoying the music, but eventually became confused, along with everyone else. (Indeed, multiple people can be heard to shout, "what is going on?")

It would be impossible to definitively state that none of the young men did anything wrong, offensive, or problematic, at some point, and maybe the smiling student was attempting to intimidate Phillips. But there's shockingly little evidence of wrongdoing, unless donning a Trump hat and standing in a group of other people doing the same is now an act of harassment or violence. Phillips' account, meanwhile, is at best flawed, and arguably deliberately misleading.

Unless other information emerges, the school's best move would be to have a conversation with the boys about the incident, perhaps discuss some strategies for remaining on perfect behavior at highly charged political rallies—where everybody is recording everything on a cell phone—and let that be the end of it.

The boys are undoubtedly owed an apology from the numerous people who joined this social media pile-on. This is shaping up to be one of the biggest major media misfires in quite some time.

* * *

Additionally, the Catholic Church - which took decades to actually criticize and admit its systemic pedophilia problem - were extremely quick to criticize the Covington kids...

[url=][/url]


And CNN's Jake Tapper admitted the media's error...


And even David Brooks flipped...


Finally, Rod Dreher wrote in The American Conservative:

It is possible that the Catholic boys were complete asses. My initial judgment was that they certainly were that. You don’t treat a peaceful elderly person like this. Even if they thought he was wrong, those boys owed him respect. Yes, the old man approached them, but they could and should have handled him with respect. They come off as bullies.

But then I watched more clips, showing the greater context of the incident. It is not as simple as it has been portrayed. Below is a more complete video account of what happened. In it, one of the Catholic boys is overheard asking, “Does anybody know what he’s doing? Does anybody know what’s going on here.”

And, in it, one of the Indians with Phillips shouts: “White people, go back to Europe. This is not your land.” He curses the students with f-bombs (video is NSFW). He goes on: “You’re being a white man about it. That’s all you know how to do.”

You didn’t see that in the news reporting, did you?

Nope.