Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FTJoe who wrote (37381)	1/18/1998 5:57:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Off Topic FTJoe, If a defense is not always necessary then why is your defense of Al-len, and offense towards myself, mandatory??? Please take a look at some of Al-len's posts to see why I justify my reaction to his instigatory postings on TPRO. First, here is his feeling about what stocks he has the most belief in for 1998. Please note that he states that he is "not interested in any other stocks right now". However you can clearly see that majority of his posts have been on the RMIL thread which he has elsewhere publically stated is not worth "spit". Message 3064752 Now here is where Al-len decides to begin his snide comments and threats to harass me by answering "all of your posts here...". Message 3066998 Message 3064450 Message 3064783 My response to an inquiry on the CSMA thread: Message 3068245 Then Al-len tries to deny the fact that he, in fact, instigated taking his grudge to other threads and to create the impression that I chose to post to CSMA "out of the blue": Message 3070981 And there are so many other posts as well... Face FTJoe, Al-len launched a personal grudge match against me on the TPRO thread. I retaliated by posting my opinions on the CSMA thread clearly stating that "two can play at this game". Restricting my responses to the RMIL thread would not been as effective. Al-len may think he is an expert in the field of dis-information, but all of his and my postings are out here as a written history of this particular exchange that he so ardently wants me to apologize for. I don't think so. And I would like for him to drop the topic as much as anyone else, but I will not permit his misrepresentation of the facts to lie unanswered. If he is serious, have his lawyer contact mine and take this petty argument off of this thread. WITH THIS POST I CONSIDER THE MATTER CLOSED AS IT SHOWS MY PERSPECTIVE ON THE ISSUE Regards, Ron