Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jargonweary who wrote (49649)	1/23/2019 11:00:01 AM
From: blessedtobehere	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63284

I'm not quite ready to convict MFG ENG yet. I will reiterate my previous post and add that the reason I don't mention Favus is because Favus already got what they wanted and I don't believe they would invest the time or energy to make those posts (but possible). In my opinion, there are 2 probable scenarios: 1. Our new friend is legit and if so, then thank you for the information. 2. Our new friend is either a FDA employee or is connected to FDA. In that case, something nefarious occurred and they are feeling the heat. Also, in that case, they just compounded their error by trying to cover it up.

To: jargonweary who wrote (49649)	1/23/2019 1:57:08 PM
From: ipeefreely	2 Recommendations Recommended By Olecranon rodneyh07 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63284

I'm a little confused as to why it seems like you're making this into a personal attack on an individual when they've simply given you their opinion on a matter.

To: jargonweary who wrote (49649)	1/23/2019 2:21:28 PM
From: MFG ENG	1 Recommendation Recommended By Olecranon Respond to of 63284

<Nice try...actually better than most we see here. But here’s some advice for your approach to your next target. You need to decide if you are going to present yourself as sophisticated, well informed and intelligent OR as innocent, naive and helpful. There were many thoughts going through my head as I went over the findings. The more you read and dissect the more your opinion changes...sometimes it's in one direction, other times it's in others. Some subjects in the findings, I'm well-informed on...others, I have to cover my @$$ on a little because I'm not 100% certain of what the implications are. That's probably why you sensed both tones. One or the other. Here, you couldn’t seem to settle on how you wanted to be perceived and it unmasked you. But, hey, when compared to others we have seen come on this board you were, as I say, better than most. Any hints where you go next? I'll be right here. This board has given me a lot of hope and courage to stay in this stock as long as I have. You guys are knowledgeable and entertaining. I hope to be here when we can all celebrate "silly" PPS's. Just curious.>