SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (1114671)2/2/2019 11:22:12 AM
From: longnshort6 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
isopatch
Mick Mørmøny
miraje
RetiredNow

and 1 more member

  Respond to of 1571399
 
What relevance does past natural cycles have with recent ...

skepticalscience.com
Climate Myth... It's a 1500 year cycle “Every one of them [climate records of the past] show this (roughly 1500 year) cycle. It was first discovered in ice cores in Greenland. Then it was seen in ocean sediments in the Atlantic. And now it’s been found everywhere, including in stalagmites in caves.

The Express: Climate change is just a 1,500 year cycle ...

carbonbrief.org.
The 1,500 year cycle the Lee refers to are probably sudden climate fluctuations that happened during the most recent glacial period, and which can be detected in ice cores. A cooling and re-warming in the northern hemisphe re is balanced by warming and re-cooling in the southern hemisphere, so these fluctuations are a re-distribution of heat in the Atlantic, and not a change overall global temperatures.

NASA Study Acknowledges Solar Cycle, Not Man, Responsible ...

bibliotecapleyades.net.
Last year, scientist S. Fred Singer published the book, Unstoppable Global Warming (Every 1500 years), which tied current warming to an ongoing Bond Event. Singer tells Daily Tech that this new study provides further evidence for a 1500-year Climate cycle, the evidence for …




To: RetiredNow who wrote (1114671)2/2/2019 12:01:30 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571399
 
" I wonder about causality?"

Righting a Scientific Wrong

A symposium credits physicist Eunice Foote for her role in discovering the principal cause of global warming





Foote was the first person to demonstrate that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, and also the first person to suggest that an atmosphere containing high levels of carbon dioxide would lead to a warmer earth.

Her research findings, contained in the paper “Circumstances affecting the heat of the sun’s rays,” were presented at the August 23, 1856, annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Being female, however, Foote was not allowed to read her own paper. Instead, Professor Joseph Henry of the Smithsonian Institution spoke on her behalf.

A few years later, Foote’s findings were reflected in the studies of physicist John Tyndall, whose research expanded on Foote’s discovery. And while Tyndall’s research is widely accepted as one of the foundations of modern climate science, Foote has faded to relative obscurity.

news.ucsb.edu
=

"The question that is more relevant to me is can humans survive the velocity of change? "
I'd go with "Can civilization survive, but that's a good question.

" if we can survive it, will it cost a lot of money to change our living habits and locations due to the climate change that comes with all fo this?"

Like abandoning Miami and New Orleans because of rising oceans, and maybe Phoenix because of drought? Yes, it will cost a ton.