SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bruiser98 who wrote (145832)2/3/2019 2:03:33 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217845
 
To cast ballot, presumably, self-exiled ex military cousin has moved back to Venezuela from Columbia. The whole show looks about ready to go prime time, and team China folks are preparing for post-change meet & greet, for the show must go on.

We are now on way out of Hong Kong, to be part of the largest human migration show now underway.

4716 was interesting and 4717 holds great promise



To: bruiser98 who wrote (145832)2/4/2019 2:26:49 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
dvdw©

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217845
 
spin as usual suspect Bloomberg might, the words underpinned by commercial reality, to be followed by actions, continue to trend correct

intending to up stake in Venezuela this night

the only uncertainties are three, (i) how honest is the governing authority of the wager company, (ii) when would either the current government or any new government release make the next payments, and (iii) when would the receiving bank release the payments to the wager company

power to the people

revolution is not a tea party

there is great chaos under the heaven, and condition is excellent

etc etc

ideally, all outsiders should bud out, but under the circumstances, for all sorts of plausible good reasons, ... and as some usually suspected parties are always gungho to intervene, such intervention might as well be pivoted to do some greater good

bloomberg.com

Venezuela's Guaido Wants China to See Maduro Is Bad for Business



Juan Guaido Photographer: Carlos Becerra/BloombergThe young politician spearheading efforts to remove Venezuela’s authoritarian leader called for a "transparent relationship" with China, a key investor in the country, saying any agreements made with the regime of Nicolas Maduro would be honored as long as they were lawfully done.

Juan Guaido, the National Assembly leader, is at the forefront of a renewed push to remove Maduro who, with his grip on the military and courts, has presided over crackdowns on protesters, the opposition and a hollowing out of Venezuela’s economy. The desperate conditions for ordinary people struggling with skyrocketing prices and power outages has spurred one of the biggest mass migrations of modern times.

“I will be very clear: all agreements that have been signed following the law will be respected,” Guaido said in a written interview. “If previous agreements were signed by adhering to the due process of approval by the National Assembly, they will be accepted and honored.”

Guaido has the backing of countries including the U.S. and Brazil, and is seeking to put a noose around Maduro’s access to funds, primarily oil and gold exports and income from state-dominated businesses. China is one of the biggest investors in Venezuela, and while it has been an ally of socialist administrations dating back to Hugo Chavez, Guaido portrayed it as having suffered from Maduro’s corruption and financial mismanagement.

"We want to establish a transparent relationship with China and put an end to the plundering of our resources that has prevailed under Maduro’s government, which has ultimately also affected Chinese investors,” he said. “China’s development projects in Venezuela have been falling as they have been affected and destroyed by corruption or debt default.”

The stance of China and Russia is crucial to Maduro’s ability to hold onto power. The countries have filled the investment and security vacuum caused by Washington’s decades-long estrangement from Caracas. But the resurgent U.S. interest makes things more complicated.

Russia has strongly supported Maduro while China has been more equivocal, mostly falling back on citing a longstanding policy of noninterference in other states’ affairs.

Asked three times last week if China still saw Maduro as Venezuela’s president, foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang simply noted that a special envoy of President Xi Jinping attended his inauguration in January. On Friday, Geng said China has “maintained close communication with all parties” and ties “shouldn’t be undermined no matter how the situation evolves.”


China is the second-biggest importer of crude from the country, but receives its barrels as repayments of debt. Venezuela hasn’t been able to send enough crude to meet its obligations in recent years as its production cratered and crude prices tumbled.

Beijing has invested more than $62 billion in Venezuela, mostly through loans, since 2007. Last year, it imported 3.6 percent of its oil supply from the country, down from just over 5 percent in 2017. In the throes of a financial crisis last September, Maduro flew to Beijing to win a $5 billion credit line from his “big sister” China. Chinese technology giants Huawei Technologies Corp. and ZTE Corp. have invested heavily in the country.

Not everyone views Beijing’s behavior as benign. Ricardo Hausmann, an acclaimed Venezuelan economist and adviser to Guaido who runs Harvard University’s Center for International Development, has called the China Development Bank a “disgrace.”

Still, China has shown itself able to navigate doing business in difficult places before. And it has probably learned lessons from Sri Lanka, Malaysia and the Maldives, where it cozied up to authoritarian leaders only to be caught wrong-footed by quick power shifts that saw new governments launch probes of Chinese-funded projects and loans.

Maduro vs Guaido
Global leaders back Venezuela’s Guaido as Maduro clings to usual allies
Source: Bloomberg research

While investments often come with strategic objectives, Beijing’s leaders are also pragmatic, and a change of leadership that incurred losses for China would be affordable for its $12 trillion economy.

“China is in a wait-and-see mode,” said Pang Zhongying, a former Chinese diplomat who is an international relations professor at the Macau University of Science and Technology. “People shouldn’t assume that China will lend a hand based on the similarity in socialist systems.”

Humanitarian aid would pour in in response to a change in government, and institutions like the International Monetary Fund and World Bank would probably play a role -- as the U.S. helped facilitate funding -- but Venezuela’s economy would require funds for infrastructure that would be unlikely to generate a return for some time. That’s where China, with its deep pockets and longer-term horizon, could come in.

“Any Venezuelan government will recognize the irreplaceable value of China as a large customer,” said Mei Xinyu, a senior researcher at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation affiliated with the Ministry of Commerce. “China’s lending is mutually beneficial for both sides.”

Read more: Why regime change is now on the table in Venezuela

Russia in contrast probably cannot afford to keep its investments open-ended and has some payments already due from the current regime.

“There is a lot of work to do in this regard and we want to continue working closely with China,” Guaido said, referring to reconstruction. He cited sectors including oil and mining, plus light industry and assembly.

“With the reactivation of our country’s productivity we see a cooperation with China as an opportunity, rather than a threat,” he added. “We are ready to begin a constructive relationship and dialogue with China as soon as possible.”



A pro-opposition protest in Caracas on Feb. 2.

Photographer: Ignacio Marin/Bloomberg
Guaido did not confirm if there had been any outreach to Beijing, only saying he would like to meet with officials "in the shortest possible time to relaunch our relationship." A person in Caracas with knowledge of the interactions said there had already been some contact with the Chinese embassy.

Those conversations center around a commitment to honor debts to China, plus Venezuela’s reconstruction needs, the person said, asking not to be identified talking about private conversations.

The outreach is being carefully done, the person added, because Guaido’s focus is on his relationship with the U.S., which views China’s presence in the region with suspicion. President Donald Trump has escalated trade tensions with China since coming to power, leading Beijing to claim the U.S. is increasingly attempting to contain it.

“If the regime changes quickly and peacefully, it will depend on whether the U.S.-backed government in Guaido recognizes the loans made under the past government,” said Gui Chenxi, an oil analyst at CITIC Futures. “For now, Guaido has signaled that payments will be maintained, but America will probably call the shots if he takes office.”

Guaido described the U.S. as both a commercial supporter and an important ally in the effort to oust Maduro. "Bilateral relationships are established on the basis of mutual respect and our relationship with the U.S. is historic,” he said.

Even so, he added "the fact that we have consolidated relationships with other nations does not mean that we cannot open ourselves up to establishing relations with other nations."

"We live in an interconnected world where all nations have their own potential,” Guaido said. "Within that space, China has an important role to play because of its capabilities and flexibility as a commercial partner."

— With assistance by Haze Fan, Esteban Duarte, Dandan Li, Sarah Chen, David Tweed, Dan Murtaugh, Serene Cheong, Ramsey Al-Rikabi, Karen Leigh, Patricia Laya, Alex Vasquez, and Brendan Scott

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: bruiser98 who wrote (145832)2/12/2019 7:21:15 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217845
 
Talking-head of usual suspect Bloomberg talking gold ...

There may come a time when all they need to comment on be gold :0)

bloomberg.com

Gold Won’t Solve Your Budget Problems

Tapping out central banks’ coffers may seem like a good idea to cash-strapped governments. It’s only likely to cause a different set of headaches.
David FicklingFebruary 12, 2019, 4:11 PM GMT+8
Most of us have a few coins lost down the backs of our sofas. Only the foolish think they can solve their money worries by fishing them out.

That’s more or less what politicians in Venezuela and Italy are contemplating at the moment, though. The Latin American government sold more than 40 percent of its gold reserves last year to fund government spending and bond payments, according to opposition lawmakers.

Italy, too, has been roiled with controversy this week after La Stampa newspaper reported that the government was considering selling part of its gold reserves to support its budget – an interpretation of a proposed law rejected by its backer, but which Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini has nonetheless described as “an interesting idea.”

It’s certainly true that the two countries’ central banks probably hold more gold than they need. About 77 percent of Venezuela’s foreign-reserve assets are bullion, according to the World Gold Council, a higher share than in any other major economy. After it, only the U.S., Germany, and Tajikistan have a bigger proportion of gold on their central-bank balance sheets than Italy’s 66 percent.

That’s in many ways an accident of history. Since the end of the gold-standard era, there’s been little need for central banks to own much more of the metal than the single-digit percentages held by China, Switzerland, Japan, the U.K. and other major economies.

Having a large share of reserves in metal can leave central banks overexposed to the movements of a single volatile asset, in contrast to a portfolio comprising a range of currencies and the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights. In addition, gold is costly to store and trade compared with banknotes and deposits. Unlike foreign government bonds, it doesn’t provide any return.

As a result, the main reason for holding it – beyond the zombie-apocalypse arguments that it’s default-proof – is that it tends to attract safe-haven demand in the teeth of a crisis. Because of this counter-cyclical behavior, a sprinkling of yellow metal can reduce the overall volatility of a portfolio. Too much, though, can produce the opposite effect, such as when the dollar price of gold fell by 28 percent in 2013.

So why not sell out?

One problem is that it won’t make much of a difference. Italy’s trailing 12-month budget deficit is currently running at around 44 billion euros ($50 billion). That’s equivalent to about 1,180 metric tons of gold at current prices, a bit less than half of the Bank of Italy’s total holdings or a third of its total foreign reserves. No one’s suggesting (yet) that Italy should meet all of its overspending with bullion sales, but the numbers should illustrate how quickly your central bank nest egg can get used up.

In addition, selling off the fourth-biggest pile of gold out there is likely to have its own effect on the market.

The Malian king Mansa Musa crashed the Middle Eastern gold market and caused a wave of inflation when he passed through on pilgrimage to Mecca in the 14th century, dispensing the largess of his west African mines on his way. The same thing happened on a smaller scale in the late 1990s when the Bank of England and Swiss National Bank decided to cut their bullion holdings, which helped drive gold to a multi-decade low of $252.55 a troy ounce and prompted European central banks to sign a five-year agreement limiting their sales to no more than 400 tons a year. 1

Central banks own about one-sixth of the world’s gold, giving their moves an outsize impact on prices. Anyone trying to sell off Italy’s reserves would find that all those bars and coins were suddenly worth a lot less than they thought they were.

The bigger issue, however, is what it would mean for Italy’s remaining 2.3 trillion euros in debt. In India, the central bank has faced pressure from New Delhi to use its foreign reserves to support the budget. As Reserve Bank of India Deputy Governor Viral Acharya argued last year, such moves by a government can lead to a “grave reassessment of its sovereign risk.” That ultimately translates into higher interest payments, negating any short-term benefit.

The austerity imposed on Italy via the constraints of the euro zone is certainly frustrating, and damaging to an economy that’s just entered its third recession in a decade. But the experience of Venezuela, a country that once hitched its fortunes to bullion, should be a warning that central bank reserve assets aren’t a bottomless piggy bank. Go too far down that path, and you risk finding that gold is all you have left to sell.