SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (398853)2/7/2019 2:14:01 PM
From: Graystone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541114
 
post-apocalyptic movie
or
I disagree.

It would be apocalyptic, not post apocalyptic. It is easy to see that calls for help would go unanswered. My late uncle was the head of a electric utility in a city unaffected by nearby ice-storm, his department went for months on maximum hours offering assistance. I think it would be apocalyptic and heroic, we would cope, not like a movie, no zombies, no asteroidal despair, no nuclear X mutants. There would be pockets of power in many places, martial law, mass suffering. It would be devastating though, truly horrific for the common folk. Most of the wealthy enclaves would lose their cable TV feeds.

It isn't that it is a movie scenario, it is just that we built a thing (the grid) with no safety factor. To correct it takes money, we could demand that redundancy and safety, like we do with aircraft manufacturers. Legislating the number of seats available on the cruise ship lifeboats should never have been required. Our interests should be their interests, governments, religions and corporations. My new favourite movie/book theme is going to be "post-scarcity" I am sure, Peter Hamilton, Salvation