Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Immunomedics (IMMU) - moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: idahoranch1 who wrote (50185)	2/8/2019 4:30:12 PM
From: kdd999	Respond to of 63276

Thank you. Adults should rebut information and not demean the person posting. To the swarm of new posters who signed on recently, this board has survived because we usually post info and their sources. And most of us try really hard to make sure it is not old or bs before we put it on the board. I realize that no one is going to go back through 50000 posts but if you dredge up pre 2019 stuff, odds are we already discussed and discounted it. Just bring in the new fodder, vs trying to stir up new emotional response to old bs. It just wastes everybody's time.

To: idahoranch1 who wrote (50185)	2/8/2019 5:40:47 PM
From: samcat500	Respond to of 63276

Your adjudication is admirable.

To: idahoranch1 who wrote (50185)	2/8/2019 5:52:36 PM
From: blessedtobehere	2 Recommendations Recommended By bobbseytwins2001 rodneyh07 Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 63276

Just so I'm clear, you don't want posts like the following? Post 49977 made by LadyPI to me. Which was not true (in some circles they call that a lie, but in this snowflake age I suppose we should say she was taken out of context). "That nasty, arrogant post you posted one eve, directed toward me, and which either you or administrator took down, repost it. Speaks volumes about you. Out of respect for Lonnie and others on this board I will leave it at that." Neither you or I have the ability to take down a post and LadyPI has been posting long enough to know that. And how long did LadyPI serve in the penalty box? I know that maybe the best thing is for us all to forget about it and move on. And that would be par for the course for the majority of posters on this board. Ignore obvious stock manipulation, ignore obvious misleading information by analysts, ignore that we have absolutely no evidence that IMMU didn't meet FDA standards (other than the FDA said so) and just move on and blame management. Sorry, you can put me back in the penalty box if you want, but I'm not wired that way. I've made information available. I compiled timelines and verifiable facts and you can do with it what you want. I can't think of anything of value which has been posted here since the CRL so I don't care about a penalty box. Just came here to try and help cancer patients get the drug they want and until the FDA produces legitimate reasons for the CRL I'm erring on the side the problem being with the FDA, not IMMU management. In a few weeks or months I may be proven wrong, but with so much at stake for the patients I can't understand the veil of secrecy at the FDA. This isn't a game.