To: sysiphus who wrote (50227 ) 2/9/2019 7:36:48 AM From: Renmanco 16 RecommendationsRecommended By bnutman bobbseytwins2001 captcobra1 CelebrityEquity corndog and 11 more members
Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 63276 There's a story told in first year law school evidence classes: As students were in the middle of one of their classes, a man rushed into the classroom and pushed the instructor, took his class lecture notes and ran out of the room. The students were too shocked to try to react or do anything to stop either the battery or the theft they had just witnessed. The instructor actually seemed the most composed of the group and, in a few minutes, after the students has regained some composure, the instructor admitted that what they had just witnessed was an experiment. He then asked the students to describe the perpetrator and the event they had just witnessed....after all, that's what evidence is all about....and who better to comprehend that concept than students studying the subject? As you might imagine, there was widespread disagreement among the students regarding: the exact time the assault began, how long the event lasted, what the attacker wore, how old he was, how tall he was, his hair color, whether the instructor was pushed on his left or right side...or his chest or back, what the attacker actually took, etc., etc. And yet, here we have even less information than a classroom full of eager beaver law students were given, and many have basically gone on describing something that, from what we have heard from the company and from the FDA, can only be described as murky or uncertain. Maybe it's time to take a breath and cool our jets for a while. If anyone isn't happy (and I'm not happy because I really do not know what the actual facts are), he or she can sell and move on....or can hold and wait for clarity to emerge. Finally, several have said that the company may read this board and others have suggested that, if they do read this board, we deserve more info from management or Behzad. Perhaps, but if so, what must they think of the sometimes mindless back-and-forth arguing over what we really know very little about at this time?