Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Famularo who wrote (3509)	1/19/1998 8:42:00 AM
From: david f. dempster	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7966

Something is not adding up here. There will be more results to come. Why did we gwet 7 drill cores from 14c and only 2 tonnes of material. While 4 holes yielded 3 tonnes. They are not telling us all there is to know. I don't think the carat count is so good, but the 1.31 carat stone is great. Well is think we will get an opening sell-off with a recovery, any other opinions?

To: Famularo who wrote (3509)	1/19/1998 10:55:00 AM
From: Graham	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7966

There are a couple of things to note: 1) Why do they keep changing in there charts the size of the standard I have seen them use stones greater than 1.0mm, 0.5mm and now 0.8mm. Most diamond companys use 1.0mm or 0.5mm as a standard throughout there expoloration. These standards are relevant to distinguish between micro and macro diamonds. 2) It should have been stated in the release below the chart that the results from K - 14A(type RC*) that the 2.99 carats is high because of the presence of one stone weighing 1.31 carats. This would leave a weight of 1.68 carats for the remaining 35 stones. These are just a couple of things to ponder.