SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145945)2/9/2019 5:51:23 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217927
 
I found and was bit disturbed by a heretofore unknown to me photograph of the coconut from perhaps 3 years ago when she was 10/11

father is sometimes the last to know

am sure the situation was under total control and vaguely remember the coconut telling me about it, something about at the 3rd floor level but paid no attention at the time

the coconut did not and does not even like glass escalators in Hong Kong mall at Times Square






To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145945)2/10/2019 3:53:34 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217927
 
too funny, the 5-eyes / forked-tongue initiative to ban Huawei everywhere is bearing fruit, and as team New Zealand, a nothing of a place w/o concentrated population centers to justify anything remotely Ericsson / Nokia, the fruit is particularly fragrant ...

- hiccups in maintaining current system in place, Huawei 4G, plus

- choice of either going w/ ultra expensive 5G or no-5G

- fewer upgrade path to 6G that could be rolled out soon enough but after Nokia and Ericsson disappears, is bought by another company willing to lose, or nationalised

love it - the drama

let us see how the know-it-all pole-climbers at NZ intelligence spin a breakdown of NZ telecom

let's see when team china chooses as the most psychological moment to apply strategic but coincidental acupressure to NZ dairy farmers and fruit suppliers

- perhaps NZ's 5-eyes/forked-tongue allies Canada and USA and Australia would be willing to buy dairy and fruits to home grown supplies

- maybe the three states added together can absorb enough NZ supplies to make sure there are enough surviving businesses and folks to support a reversion to 3G to be built from scavenged second and thirdhand equipment from Africa

- Should NZ telcos wish to buy more Huawei 4G equipment, am wondering what Huawei's stance should be vs could be

- I know what my first / top-of-mind response would be - "buy my 5G base stations, guaranteed to work better, and priced cheaper than my soon to be phased-out 4G, unless you wish to consider my refurbished 3G collected from my African clients"

stuff.co.nz

Next development in Huawei saga may not be about 5G


Limiting Chinese involvement in the telco industry while preserving network competition could prove a tough puzzle.
ANALYSIS It may take months or years before Kiwi telecommunications companies find out whether they will be able to buy 5G equipment from China's Huawei.

But the next instalment in the Huawei saga could come sooner than that, with one of New Zealand's spy agencies revealing it is requiring telecommunications companies to submit plans on proposed network changes on average every few days.

In December, the Government Communications Security Bureau blocked a proposal by Spark to use Huawei equipment to upgrade its mobile network to 5G, citing "significant network security risks".

Spark now has the right to explain how it could "prevent or mitigate" the risks the GCSB has identified, after which the spy agency could refer the matter to the Minister responsible for GCSB, Andrew Little, for a final decision if it wasn't satisfied.

Spark has chosen instead to bide its time before pressing for an answer, perhaps while it waits for the international angst surrounding Huawei to abate or for the geo-politics of the west's relationship with China to improve.

Vodafone and 2degrees have made it clear they would prefer to wait anyway before investing in 5G.

But the next test for Huawei could still come at almost any time, as and when a telco needs to submit a plan to the GCSB that involves making a change to one of their existing networks.



JONATHAN HAYWARD/AP
Protesters demand the release of Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou who was arrested in Canada at the request of the US in December over alleged breaches of US sanctions on Iran.
2degrees' 4G network is largely built using Huawei technology and Spark, Vodafone and Chorus also use equipment from Huawei for 4G, cable networks and for some rural broadband services.

Under the Telecommunications Interception Capability and Security Act (TICSA), which was passed by Parliament in 2013, telecommunications firms need to engage with the GCSB before making changes that could impact network security.

These are not uncommon. A GCSB spokeswoman says that it deals with "more than 100" TICSA notifications each year.

If a telco did, for example, need to ask the GCSB to approve the purchase of more 4G equipment from Huawei, that would be unlikely to become public, however.

The spy agency treats all applications under TICSA as commercially confidential and its knock-back of Spark's original 5G proposal only became public because Spark chose to make it so.

While that means New Zealand's stance on Huawei could go dark for while, the potential fall-out from the global squeeze on Huawei became apparent relatively close to home late last month.

Australian telecommunications firm TPG announced it had abandoned the construction of what would have been Australia's fourth 4G mobile network after spending A$100 million on Huawei equipment for 1500 cellsites and on partially building 900 of them.



ANDY WONG/AP
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang has called on Washington to stop what he described as an unreasonable crackdown on Huawei.
TPG, which is valued at A$6.7 billion (NZ$7b) on the Australian Securities Exchange, said in a statement that Australia's 5G ban on Huawei was a "key reason" for its decision, since it meant the 4G network could not in practice be easily upgraded to 5G.

There is a backdrop to TPG's decision. The Australian Consumer and Competition Commission signalled in December that it was minded to block the merger of TPG and fellow telco Vodafone Hutchison Australia because of the likely impact on mobile competition.

With TPG's nascent mobile network now scrubbed, the regulator's main objection to the deal now appears moot.

Nevertheless, TPG's move does highlight the challenges that Kiwi telcos – and 2degrees in particular – would face in New Zealand if the GCSB's block on Spark sourcing 5G gear from Huawei was firmed up into something broader.

2degrees has said it faces "significant" costs if it has to switch to another supplier, with chief technology officer Mike Davies saying changes in the radio access network would keep him awake at night.



Andy Wong
FILE - In this Dec. 18, 2018, photo, the logo of Huawei stands on its office building at the research and development centre in Dongguan in south China's Guangdong province. The U.S. Justice Department unsealed criminal charges Monday, Jan. 28, 2019 against Chinese tech giant Huawei, a top company executive and several subsidiaries, alleging the company stole trade secrets, misled banks about its business and violated U.S. sanctions. (AP Photo/Andy Wong, File)
Huawei carrier group president Ryan Ding played down developments in New Zealand in a letter to a British select committee late last month, saying the New Zealand government had "turned down a single 5G proposal submitted for review by one carrier" while noting the regulatory process was continuing.

"The governments in some countries have labelled Huawei as a security threat, but they have never substantiated these allegations with solid evidence," he said.

Little may eventually have to decide which he needs to put first; the GCSB's undisclosed network security concerns, or strong three-way mobile network competition.

But for the moment, it may suit everyone to lie low.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145945)2/10/2019 7:57:23 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217927
 
re <<gold>>

Greenspan: economic freedom
Bernanke: quaint
Putin: power
Maduro: redemption

reuters.com

How Venezuela turns its useless bank notes into goldEL CALLAO, Venezuela (Reuters) - Venezuela’s most successful financial operations in recent years have not taken place on Wall Street, but in primitive gold-mining camps in the nation’s southern reaches.

A man melts gold at his workshop in Puerto Ordaz, Venezuela August 7, 2018. REUTERS/William Urdaneta

With the country’s economy in meltdown, an estimated 300,000 fortune hunters have descended on this mineral-rich jungle area to earn a living pulling gold-flecked earth from makeshift mines.

Their picks and shovels are helping to prop up the leftist government of President Nicolas Maduro. Since 2016, his administration has purchased 17 tonnes of the metal worth around $650 million from so-called artisan miners, according to the most recent data from the nation’s central bank.

Paid with the country’s near-worthless bank notes, these amateurs in turn supply the government with hard currency to purchase badly needed imports of food and hygiene products. This gold trade is a blip on international markets. Still, the United States is using sanctions and intimidation in an effort to stop Maduro from using his nation’s gold to stay afloat.

The Trump administration is pressuring the United Kingdom not to release $1.2 billion in gold reserves Venezuela has stored in the Bank of England. U.S. officials recently castigated an Abu Dhabi-based investment firm for its Venezuela gold purchases, and have warned other potential foreign buyers to back off.

The existence of Maduro’s gold program is well-known. How it functions is not.

To get a glimpse inside, Reuters tracked Venezuela’s gold from steamy jungle mines, through the central bank in the capital of Caracas to gold refineries and food exporters abroad, speaking with more than 30 people with knowledge of the trade. They included miners, intermediaries, merchants, academic researchers, diplomats and government officials. Almost all requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, or because they feared retribution from Venezuelan or U.S. authorities.

What emerges is the portrait of a desperate experiment in laissez-faire industrial policy by Venezuela’s socialist leaders. U.S. sanctions have hammered the nation’s oil industry and crippled its ability to borrow. The formal mining sector has been decimated by nationalization. So Maduro has unleashed freelance prospectors to extract the nation’s mineral wealth with virtually no regulation or state investment.

The Bolivarian Revolution now leans heavily on ragtag laborers such as Jose Aular, a teenager who says he has contracted malaria five times at a wildcat mine near Venezuela’s border with Brazil. Aular works 12 hours daily lugging sacks of earth to a small mill that uses toxic mercury to extract flecks of precious metal. Mining accidents are common in these ramshackle operations, workers said. So are shootings and robberies.

“The government knows what happens in these mines and it benefits from it,” said Aular, 18. “Our gold goes into their hands.”

Maduro has also received a crucial assist from Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, a fellow strongman who has likewise sparred with the Trump administration.

Venezuela sells most of its gold to Turkish refineries, then uses some of the proceeds to buy that nation’s consumer goods, according to people with direct knowledge of the trade. Turkish pasta and powdered milk are now staples in Maduro’s subsidized food program. Trade between the two nations grew eightfold last year.

But scrutiny is intensifying as Venezuela’s politics reach the boiling point. In recent days, many Western countries have recognized Venezuela’s opposition leader Juan Guaido as the South American nation’s rightful president.

Maduro’s adversaries have called on foreign buyers of Venezuela’s precious metal to stop doing business with what they say is an illegitimate regime.

“We are going to protect our gold,” opposition legislator Carlos Paparoni told Reuters in an interview.

GOLD FEVER The gold road begins in places like La Culebra, an isolated jungle area in southern Venezuela. Here, hundreds of men labor in crude mining operations that would be at home in the 19th century. They excavate mineral-laden dirt with picks in hand-dug tunnels, hauling it out with pulleys and winches.

Their activity is laying waste to fragile forest ecosystems and spreading mosquito-borne diseases. Miners complain of shakedowns by military forces sent to guard the region, whose homicide rate is seven times the national average. Venezuela’s ministries of defense and information did not respond to requests for comment.

Miner Jose Rondon is used to hardship. Now 47, he arrived in 2016 from northeast Venezuela with his two adult sons. His bus driver’s salary could not keep pace with Venezuela’s hyperinflation, which the International Monetary Fund projects will hit 10 million percent this year.

The three men net roughly 10 grams of gold monthly from backbreaking work. Still it is roughly 20 times what they could earn back home.

“Here I do much better,” said Rondon, resting in a crude bunkhouse strung with hammocks.

Gold in hand, miners head to the town of El Callao to sell their nuggets. Most buyers are unlicensed, small-scale traders working in cramped shops fitted with alarms and steel doors.

“The state is buying gold, everyone is buying gold, because it’s what is doing well,” said Jhony Diaz, a licensed wholesaler in Puerto Ordaz, 171 kilometers (106 miles) north of El Callao. Diaz says he buys gold from traders and resells every three days to the central bank.

Because Venezuela’s currency, the bolivar, is worth less every hour someone holds it, the state pays a premium over international prices to make it worthwhile for those who could smuggle gold out of the country to exchange for dollars.

Traders who sell to Diaz end up with bricks of cash to carry back to El Callao and other gold-rush towns to pay miners, who use it to buy food, supplies and send whatever is left to their families.

Gold purchased by the government is smelted in the nearby furnaces of Minerven, the state-run mining company, according to a high-ranking employee. It is then transported to the vaults of the central bank in the capital Caracas, 843 kilometers (524 miles) away.

The gold does not stay there long. The central bank’s gold reserves have plummeted to their lowest levels in 75 years. Venezuela is selling the artisan metal as well as existing reserves to pay its bills, according to two high-ranking government officials.

The main buyer these days is Turkey, the officials said.

TURKISH ALLIANCE Maduro’s gold program has developed in tandem with his deepening relationship with Turkey’s Erdogan. Both leaders have been criticized internationally for cracking down on political dissent and undermining democratic norms to concentrate power.

A Nov. 1 executive order signed by U.S. President Donald Trump bars U.S. persons and entities from buying gold from Venezuela. It does not apply to foreigners. Ankara has assured the U.S. Treasury that all of Turkey’s trade with Venezuela is in accordance with international law.

Venezuela in December 2016 announced a direct flight from Caracas to Istanbul on Turkish Airlines. The development was surprising given low demand for travel between the two nations.

Trade data show those planes are carrying more than passengers. On New Year’s Day, 2018, Venezuela’s central bank began shipping gold to Turkey with a $36 million air shipment of the metal to Istanbul. It came just weeks after a visit by Maduro to Turkey.

Shipments last year reached $900 million, according to Turkish government data and trade reports.

Venezuela’s central bank has been selling its artisan gold directly to Turkish refiners, according to two senior Venezuelan officials. Proceeds go to the Venezuelan state development bank Bandes to purchase Turkish consumer goods, the officials said.

Gold buyers include Istanbul Gold Refinery, or IGR; and Sardes Kiymetli Madenler, a Turkish trading firm, according to a person who works in Turkey’s gold industry as well as a Caracas-based diplomat and the two senior Venezuelan officials.

In an interview with Reuters, IGR CEO Aysen Esen denied the company has been involved in any Venezuelan gold deals. In a written statement, she said she met with Venezuelan and Turkish officials in Istanbul in April to offer her views on compliance with international regulations.

Esen said she advised the Turkish government that working with Venezuela “would not be right for leading institutions or the state.”

As for Sardes Kiymetli Madenler, no one at its Istanbul offices responded to inquiries from Reuters.

Turkish consumer products, meanwhile, are making their way to Venezuelan tables. In early December, 54 containers of Turkish powdered milk arrived at the port of La Guaira near Caracas, according to port records seen by Reuters.

The Istanbul-based shipper, Mulberry Proje Yatirim, shares an address with Marilyns Proje Yatirim, a mining company that signed a joint venture with Venezuela’s state mining firm Minerven last year, according to filings with a Turkish trade registry gazette in September.

The companies did not respond to a request for comment.

Even Maduro’s critics acknowledge he has pulled off a neat trick of alchemy: By compensating hard-pressed citizen miners with inflation-ravaged bolivars and obtaining precious metal in return, he has found a way to spin straw into gold.

Venezuelan economist Angel Alvarado, an opposition lawmaker, said “dark operations and unusual mechanisms of commercial exchange,” are among the few tools Maduro has left.

“There is a desperation to stay in power at all costs,” Alvarado said.

(This version of the story corrects spelling of IGR CEO’s first name, Turkish trading firm and mining company)

Reporting by Corina Pons and Maria Ramirez in El Callao. Additional reporting by Mayela Armas in Caracas, Tibisay Romero in Valencia, Humeyra Pamuk in Washington, Daren Butler and Dominic Evans in Istanbul. Writing by Brian Ellsworth. Editing by Marla Dickerson




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145945)2/12/2019 7:09:51 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217927
 
The pentagon folks are so sensitive, categorising own stuff as space garbage :0)

bloomberg.com

China’s Space Debris Cleanup May Be Cover Story, Pentagon Says
Anthony CapaccioFebruary 12, 2019, 6:20 AM GMT+8
About 1,800 of 21,000 big space objects are active satellites


China is developing sophisticated space capabilities such as “satellite inspection and repair” and debris cleanup -- “at least some of which could also function” as weapons against U.S. satellites, according to the Defense Intelligence Agency.

The increase in what’s essentially orbiting garbage that could damage or destroy a satellite “has implications for policymakers worldwide and is encouraging the development of space debris removal technology,” the agency said Monday in an unclassified publication on threats to U.S. satellites.

But “this technology is dual-use because it could be used to damage another satellite,” it said.

China’s Foreign Ministry on Tuesday said the U.S. allegations were “groundless.”

“Recently the U.S. has defined outer space as a battlefield and announced the establishment of an outer space force,” spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a briefing in Beijing. “So this may lead to the reality of the weaponization and endangerment of outer space.”

Of about 21,000 large objects in space that are least 10 centimeters (4 inches) in size that are tracked and cataloged in Earth’s orbit, only about 1,800 are active satellites, according to the defense agency. The rest is debris, including parts of spacecraft.

More than a third of all recorded debris is from two events: China’s use of a missile in 2007 to destroy a defunct satellite and the accidental collision between a U.S. communications satellite and a defunct Russian one in 2009.

From 1998 through 2017, the International Space Station, which is in low Earth orbit, maneuvered at least 25 times to avoid potential orbital collisions, the intelligence agency said.

— With assistance by David Ramli



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145945)2/14/2019 4:53:19 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217927
 
trade wars are ... fluid

should this scenario play according to script, am guessing Malaysia, Taiwan, Singapore would be knee-capped, S. Korea hobbled, and Japan wobbled, none of which is exactly bad unless one happens of any of those countries

and in time, as those migrate to China ...

well, let us not speculate

let us wait to see what trump reckons

the age of disintermediation may turn out to be alt-globalisation 2.0, and if so, merely accelerate the work of globalisation 1.0, namely in-de-flation hypersonic-ed

at some juncture deep-state USA may cease fretting over Huawei 5G and start wondering about a lot of other happenings

seekingalpha.com

China proposes $200B U.S. semi purchase - WSJ
Brandy Betz
Feb. 14, 2019 10:08 AM ET
China will promise to make large purchases of U.S. semiconductors and other goods during this week's trade talks, according to WSJ sources.

China's economic-planning agency proposes increasing semiconductor purchases to $200B over six years, a fivefold increase over current exports, to help ease the trade tensions.

But U.S. semi companies might have to alter their supply chains so that the chips export directly from the States to China rather than through another country where the chips are assembled and tested.

The semi companies also point out they can't meet the demand China projects, having exported only $6.1B of semiconductors to the region in 2017.

The talks began on Monday, but high-level talks will happen today and tomorrow.

Related semiconductor ETFs: SOXL, SOXX, SMH, USD, PSI, XSD, SOXS, SSG, FTXL, XTH

Visit Seeking Alpha's Premium ETF Screener, the best ETF research tool for your portfolio



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145945)2/15/2019 2:02:42 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217927
 
am figuring economics shall trump non-economics, because am biased towards history-matters / mathematics-rule

edition.cnn.com

America's fight with Huawei is messing with the world's 5G plans

Hong Kong (CNN Business) — The US-led offensive against Chinese tech firm Huawei is creating big problems for mobile operators as they start building the next generation of wireless networks.

The United States is trying to persuade other countries not to allow Huawei equipment into new superfast 5G networks because it claims the gear could be used by the Chinese government for spying.
Huawei strongly denies the accusations. And it has already built up such a strong lead in 5G technology that it's practically irreplaceable for many wireless carriers that want to be among the first to offer the new services.

"Banning Huawei will create a vacuum that no one can fill in a timely fashion and may seriously impair 5G deployments worldwide," said Stéphane Téral, a mobile telecom infrastructure expert at research firm IHS Markit. The uncertainty is particularly problematic for Europe, where Huawei was expected to play a key role in building 5G networks that the region's leaders say are vital for its economic future.

The international rollout of 5G has become a front line in the broader clash over advanced technology between the United States and China that is reshaping the relationship between the world's top two economies.

The United States doesn't have a heavyweight global competitor to Huawei in telecommunications equipment. The Chinese firm's biggest rivals are Ericsson ( ERIC) of Sweden and Nokia ( NOK) of Finland. But they have struggled for years with losses and job cuts while Huawei has powered ahead, generating annual revenue of more than $100 billion, building a strong base in China and amassing intellectual property that will help determine the future of 5G.

A Huawei event in Beijing showcasing new 5G products. The company is one of China's most successful global businesses.

Unhappy mobile operators

Some top international mobile operators are warning that by shutting Huawei out of 5G networks, countries risk undermining their own tech capabilities. The new wave of wireless communications is expected to increase internet speeds as much as 100 times compared with 4G networks, and help power emerging technologies like smart cities and connected vehicles.
Vodafone's ( VOD) CEO Nick Read cautioned last month that a complete ban on all Huawei gear would substantially delay the availability of 5G. The mobile carrier has suspended the installation of the Chinese company's equipment in core networks in Europe while it speaks with authorities and the company.
In August, Vodafone slammed the Australian government's decision to ban Huawei from providing 5G technology for networks there, saying the move "fundamentally undermines Australia's 5G future."
UK telecom group BT's chief architect, Neil McRae, put the situation in stark terms late last year.

"There is only one true 5G supplier right now, and that is Huawei," he said at an industry event in London. "The others need to catch up."

BT ( BT) said in December that it won't include Huawei equipment in the heart of its planned 5G network, but will continue to use it for areas that are considered "benign," like the radio masts that connect wireless devices with the core network.
The head of BT's consumer brands told CNN Business last week that Huawei had given him no "cause for concern" over the years.
But British officials have security concerns, and Huawei has promised to spend $2 billion to address them. In a letter last month to UK lawmakers, the Chinese company warned that the process will take three to five years to have tangible results, likening it to "replacing components on a high-speed train in motion."

Huawei's rivals may be a year behind



The situation should have Ericsson and Nokia cheering, but experts say the two companies may not be very well positioned to capitalize on Huawei's difficulties.

"It goes without saying that other leading vendors stand to benefit in the short-term," according to analysts at Dell'Oro Group, a market research firm that specializes in telecoms infrastructure analysis.

Ericsson and Nokia both declined to comment on their competitors. Instead, they touted their advancements on 5G in statements to CNN Business.

Nokia claims it holds "the industry's only end-to-end 5G portfolio that is available globally," while Ericsson said it has publicly announced more 5G contracts with operators "than any other vendor."

A 5G-themed Ericsson campus in Belgium. Last month, the company posted its first annual sales growth since 2013, crediting it to "increased 5G demand" among US operators.

But Huawei claims its 5G technology is at least a year ahead of its rivals — and many experts agree.
"From my conversations with carriers, they've found that Huawei is far more advanced than the other two right now," said Dexter Thillien, a senior tech analyst at research firm Fitch Solutions.

The battle for Europe

Executives at Nokia and Ericsson may also be treading carefully in public for fear of angering the Chinese government and being cut off from its vast market. Nokia, in particular, employs about 15,000 people in China, more than double its headcount of 6,000 in its home country of Finland.

"Their presence there is very, very important for them," Thillien said. "So I don't think they'll go publicly and go and say things like, 'Pick us, because we're European and we're more secure.'"

Even if governments don't block Huawei outright, the possibility of restrictions is casting a shadow over the Chinese company as mobile operators make investment decisions.

A Nokia booth at a mobile conference in Shanghai. Nokia and Ericsson are said to be treading carefully around the controversy surrounding Huawei for fear of prompting a backlash in China, a key market.

"It's probably better technologically — but technology's only one side of the argument," Thillien said. He pointed to Europe as "the big battle right now" for Huawei.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said last week that "there are big discussions about Huawei" in her country. "We need to talk to China to ensure that companies do not simply give up all data that is used to the Chinese state," she said, adding that "safeguards" were needed.
"This situation has created a big bump in Europe's 5G roadmap, while other regions like the Middle East, Africa and Latin America are watching closely," Téral said.

"In the meantime, China and the US are chugging along" with their own rollouts, he added.

A Huawei store in Berlin. Germany and other countries are stepping up scrutiny of the Chinese company as the US government warns against using its equipment in 5G networks.

The race for 5G



Researchers have good reason to believe in Huawei's technical prowess.

It's one of the world's biggest holders of 5G patents and has contributed most to the effort to establish an international standard for 5G, according to IPlytics, a market intelligence firm that tracks tech trends.

Experts at the Eurasia Group say the standard-setting process "will determine not just how 5G networks are built, but also how money flows between participants." Companies that contribute heavily to developing the standard will receive royalty payments from other telecom players, which "in turn, will help fund future innovation," the analysts wrote in a November report.
Some experts, however, caution that it's too soon to say who's really leading on 5G, mainly because definitions of the technology have yet to be finalized.

"5G is still at the trial stage," said Zhenshan Zhong, who specializes in emerging technology in China for research firm IDC. "Before the test results come out, I don't think anyone can say for definite whether one vendor is actually going to be stronger than the other."

Huawei's financial muscle

Huawei's size and financial firepower enable it to dwarf its rivals' spending on efforts to come up with new tech.

In 2017, it invested more than $13 billion in research and development, topping Microsoft ( MSFT) and Apple ( AAPL), according to consulting firm PwC. In comparison, Nokia says it spent $5.6 billion on research and development that year, while Ericsson typically allocates around $4.4 billion each year.
Ericsson and Nokia's "financial troubles and strategy troubles over the last few years" may have weakened their focus on 5G, Thillien said.

A Nokia research and development lab in Canada. The Finnish company has undergone waves of restructuring in recent years.

Huawei has the added advantage of being the key player in its vast home market.

Worldwide spending on 5G will balloon from $660 million in 2018 to $70.9 billion in 2022, according to IDC. China alone is expected to account for nearly half of all global 5G expenditure this year, it said.

Huawei's ability to offer more than just network equipment gives it another advantage. It's one of the world's top three smartphone makers, and it also provides cloud computing services and makes artificial intelligence chips.

"Given how all-encompassing 5G is going to be, this 'total-telecom' approach is powerful," said Peter Richardson, a director of tech strategies at research firm Counterpoint. "No other industry player is doing anything similar."