Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stsimon who wrote (145975)	2/11/2019 7:07:26 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By Julius Wong Respond to of 220240

I agree that the russian advantage is "big" - big territory - big rockets - big wars "big" does not need much sophistication, typically, and tends to be exhausting for all sides another phrase for "big" is "strategic depth" it is interesting that Afghanistan was not taken down by "big" from all sides Afghanistan's advantage is "tough" or "very tough" or "very extremely tough", in any case does not need sophistication. Odd that each time events do not go Russia or USA way in Afghanistan, some locals end up receiving a cache of shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles, which be more sophisticated than AK47 and the RPG - coincidences am sure, to do w/ levelling the playing field I suppose