Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Starowl who wrote (46042)	1/19/1998 11:35:00 AM
From: derek cao	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Interesting article on intel and microsoft from IBD: Justice's Scales Tipped Against Software King? Date: 1/19/98 Author: Matt Krantz Why does software giant Microsoft Corp. face more government antitrust scrutiny than chip king Intel Corp.? Both companies have a lock on huge market shares in their respective industries. Each is known to double, even triple, the norm in quarterly profit margin. And both are constantly on the Federal Trade Commission's radar screen. Of late, though, Microsoft also has been put under the Justice Department's microscope. Microsoft faces a Justice probe for bundling its Internet Explorer Web browser with its Windows operating system. In '95, the department also blocked the company's planned acquisition of financial software maker Intuit Inc. of Mountain View, Calif. George Bittlingmayer, former FTC economist and professor at the University of California at Davis, explained for IBD why Microsoft is getting a closer government look. IBD: Why is Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft subject to a harsher antitrust investigation than Santa Clara, Calif.-based Intel? Bittlingmayer: Microsoft has more domestic competitors (via individual software applications) than Intel. Yes, Intel faces AMD (Advanced Micro Devices Inc. of Sunnyvale, Calif.) and Cyrix (Corp. of Richardson, Texas, a unit of National Semiconductor Corp. in Santa Clara, Calif.), but not much more. Domestic politics favor attack of Microsoft over Intel. IBD: Why would Microsoft's greater domestic competition make it more of a target? Bittlingmayer: You don't have nearly the domestic squawking over Intel as you do with Microsoft. Microsoft does have a reputation for sharp elbows that creates ill will. I don't want to sound too cynical, but these investigations are sparked by political pressure, not empirical measure of market share. IBD: How does the process work? Bittlingmayer: I'll explain with a case. Remember the case involving the proposed merger of Microsoft and Intuit? The market that was supposedly being monopolized, online banking, didn't even exist. And no one had any market share to speak of. That shows how a case is brought for political reasons, not market share measures. It also shows that there aren't hard-fast economic and legal principles guiding investigators. IBD: Is it possible that the Justice Department's investigation isn't about browsers? Could it be about holding back Microsoft? Bittlingmayer: Twenty years from now, there won't be a separate browser. We'll look back and say, 'These guys (regulators) were smoking something.' Legally, (the decision's) going to depend on (Justice finding) abuse. As a practical matter, you can always find something . . . . A big business is always doing something that someone will object to. The antitrust laws are constructed with that potential abuse in mind. It's not illegal to be a monopoly. What is illegal is if a monopoly abuses its power. IBD: When did this begin? Bittlingmayer: The struggles of trust busters at the turn of the century created these terms. Just being big wasn't going to get you sued, but if you did something naughty, then you'd get broken up. And once political pressure heats up, you can always find something anti-competitive in a situation like this. In Microsoft's case, its ''naughty'' activity is charging prices that are too low (on the browser). IBD: How long do these antitrust cases last? Bittlingmayer: They can go on for years. One case against IBM went on for 13 years, between 1969 and 1982. Microsoft's a big case. And once the government's gone this far, it'd lose face to simply back off and call it quits. That's the problem Intel has with the FTC. The FTC looked at Intel before, during the Bush administration. After looking at Intel, the case was dropped. The FTC is unlikely to (drop the case) a second time. That would make the agency either look like a bunch of patsies or like they don't know what they're doing. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (C) Copyright 1998 Investors Business Daily, Inc. Metadata: MSFT INTC INTU AMD NSC I/8065 I/3675 I/4010 E/IBD E/SN1 E/TECH

To: Starowl who wrote (46042)	1/19/1998 1:24:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 186894

Starowl - Re: "Your reference to Chief Broom in "One Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest" Congratulations! You win the cigar! Paul

To: Starowl who wrote (46042)	1/20/1998 5:03:00 PM
From: Maverick	Respond to of 186894

Intel launches Quick Web caching technology By Nancy Weil InfoWorld Electric Posted at 9:34 AM PT, Jan 19, 1998 Intel Monday introduced software designed to take some of the wait out of slow download times for Internet pages that feature graphics, one of the banes of online existence. The Quick Web software, which was announced last September, does bit-stream data analysis in real time to identify data that can be compressed, allowing for speedier downloads. Targeted at Internet service providers, it also caches images so that after a user first requests a particular page it is stored on the local ISP server. Netcom Online Communications Services and Erols Internet have announced that they will offer the software to their subscribers, and GlobalCenter, a digital distribution company, also is using the technology, Intel said. Sprint also has been testing the software. Most users of the software will have to change their Internet browser setting, but will not have to add software to their machines. ISPs will pay Intel a licensing fee for the software. An Intel official said when the technology was announced that Internet users are likely to be willing to pay a bit more on top of monthly access fees for the ability to download pages with graphics more quickly. The technology was developed at the Intel Architecture Laboratories.