Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1118410)	2/17/2019 6:22:30 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571782

Okay, worst case scenario for the climate skeptics argument is the Satellite data could have a wrong offset now, which means temperatures are in fact warmer from 40 years ago. 1980 is a predicted (and actual fact) a cold point. I remember those winters. It's not that big of a deal. The predictions from the electromagnetic (solar) data say the temperature is going to go down sharply to around 2035. A big difference from "global warming" prediction. If you watch the video by Piers Corbyn, the evidence he show against the "CO2 warmers" is compelling, termites and all. Just working from an earlier prediction by Timo Niroma (1998) we are just starting a cooling period that will last until about 2031 at least. Several other researchers working on the electromagnetic side of things all predict the same. The maths is not that hard. Count the sunspots, look at some orbit data, look at the past weather records, and you can tell what the weathers gonna do. Climate and all. It should all be coming out in the wash in the next few years.