Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1118756)	2/19/2019 11:07:15 AM
From: RetiredNow	Respond to of 1573902

I know. Romney and Paul were died in the wool establishment men. However, who else was their to vote for? You know who I think would have been the best President? Ron Paul. He's a guy who was smarter than all the rest and knew more about how our economy and monetary policy worked than all the rest, which is exactly why he would have never been allowed to be President. He might very well have handcuffed the Fed, which would have been great for our economy in the long run and for reversing the inequality of wealth in this country. But would you have rather voted for Obama or Romney? The choice was clear for me, especially after Obama's first four years proved he was a 3rd term of Bush Jr., who I also voted for in the first four years, but then soured on when he engaged in endless wars and a massive military and debt run up. If Trump continues to run up our debt like he's doing now, I may lose the stomach for him too, but you'll never catch me knowingly voting for a Socialist.