Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (29976)	1/19/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Gerald.. >> There is no reasonable argument that this "loan" was in the best interest of IPM or its shareholders. << Right and vice versa. So let's focus on the big picture. Do you really think that without those loans, IPM would be better off?

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (29976)	1/19/1998 1:35:00 PM
From: go4it	Respond to of 35569

Gerald, I have stated how upset I was about the loan but the fact is that it was a legal transaction and they are accountable to their share holders. Once again I am looking for the funds such as Capital Gaurdian to be the watch dogs for me since I am sure that they are privy to a little more information than we are. i simply wish that I knew what the reason was. I know nothing about NCMI. MGAU I have less of a problem with since if and when an commercial process is developed it should have a two fold effect with the MGAU property. Chuck