SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Microsoft - When to short -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike McFarland who wrote (70)1/23/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Mike McFarland  Respond to of 96
 
I'm no longer planning on buying puts again--after watching
this run back up toward 140, and with just too much good news
I'm off to find something better. Also, I thought about MSFT's
revenue numbers, and whether they can continue to grow,
and I am not so sure anymore that they will start to slow down.
Of course it all depends on whether or not they can put
enough into W98 to make people upgrade, multi monitor
support will probably be all that I need to switch. As far as
NT--there don't happen to be any NT machines in my
building so what the hell do I know about it? Anyway,
after looking at revenues again, I guess it really doesn't
take too much per customer for Microsoft to continue to
grow its revenues--and there are so many customers...
No way in hell would I be long this stock, if they blow
the release of 98 or NT5 it'll be a huge disaster, one that
could very well drag the whole market down. But what
are the chances? Why Microsoft has probably already
got a working W98 with the browser stripped out!



To: Mike McFarland who wrote (70)1/25/1998 10:11:00 AM
From: K. M. Strickler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 96
 
I thought that Bill Gates was on the news announcing that MSFT would be involved in the desk top units. I have seen Windows CE advertized for the palmtops, so it will be interesting as to what happens.

I can't help but agree with you on not knowing where MSFT will stop. I agree with your analogy on the size of the software 'base'. I've always referred to that as 'critical mass' and it really doesn't matter what the industry is. Once that 'mass' is achieved, the business seems to be impervious to bad news! Look at GM, Ford, Chrysler, ADM and some of the others (Tobacco) and you see what I mean. It isn't infallible if you look at the destruction of an industry from the inside (steel, railroad, AT&T), you have to get out.