SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1119672)2/22/2019 3:08:33 PM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
ryanaka

  Respond to of 1573719
 
UR a trumptard LIAR on top of a dumbass: U.S. Babies Are Less Likely to Survive Their First Year Than Babies in Other Rich Countries; AMERICA IS A DISGRACE!!!!
By DAVID JOHNSON
January 9, 2018
time.com

Babies born in America are less likely to reach their first birthday than babies born in other wealthy countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a new study found. While infant mortality rates have declined across the OECD since 1960, including in America, the U.S. has failed to keep pace with its high-income peers, according to a report published in the journal Health Affairs.

Compared to 19 similar OECD countries, U.S. babies were three times more likely to die from extreme immaturity and 2.3 times more likely to experience sudden infant death syndrome between 2001 and 2010, the most recent years for which comparable data is available across all the countries. If the U.S. had kept pace with the OECD’s overall decline in infant mortality since 1960, that would have resulted in about 300,000 fewer infant deaths in America over the course of 50 years, the report found.

The reasons the U.S. has fallen behind include higher poverty rates relative to other developed countries and a relatively weak social safety net, says lead author Ashish Thakrar, medical resident at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and Health System.

“The poorer children are, the worse their health outcomes are,” says Thakrar, whose team found that poverty among U.S. children has been higher than in the 19 comparable OECD countries since the mid 1980s.

Premature delivery and low birthweight have been consistently associated withpoverty, which affects over 20% of U.S. children, the second highest percent among 35 developed nations, according to a 2013 United Nations Children’s Fund report.

Thakrar’s team used membership in the OECD as a proxy for similar nations to the U.S., and narrowed the group to 19 members for which 50 years of high-quality data was available, known as the OECD19.



Thakrar’s research supports a 2013 National Academy of Medicine report, which found Americans’ health has fallen behind that of other high-income countries. “Their big conclusion is that the gap stems from risky health behavior and a fragmented health system,” Thakrar says.

Child mortality in the U.S., defined as deaths of children age 1 to 19, has likewise seen slower declines than in other developed nations. The numbers in the U.S. are partly driven by gun deaths. From 2001 to 2010, 15-to-19-year-olds were 82 times more likely to die from gun violence in the U.S. than in other wealthy countries.



Thakrar also attributes the higher U.S. child and infant mortality rates to a lack of preventative care. While the U.S. spends the most on health care per capitacompared to OECD nations, some of them have stronger public benefits programs, Thakrar says. “We spend more on health care that’s taking care of children that are already sick,” he says. “But we spend far less money on welfare programs to keep children from becoming sick, and on keeping them safe from injuries.”

Methodology

Membership in the OECD was used as a proxy for similar nations to the U.S. The group was narrowed to OECD members with 50 years of high-quality data, minus the U.S. It includes: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

Contact us at editors@time.com.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1119672)2/22/2019 3:18:07 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 1573719
 
AMERICA IS A DISGRACE!!! Why does America have so many hungry kids?
By Thom Patterson, CNN
Updated 3:48 PM ET, Thu June 15, 2017
cnn.com

(CNN)It was a tender moment Elle Dingman will remember for a long time.

Outside a small hotel in Branson, Missouri, in April, Dingman was volunteering with a local group that distributes free meals when a barefoot, barely dressed, 2-year-old boy walked up to her without hesitation.
His name was Ryder.



"He came over to me, and he grabbed my hand."

Dingman had never met this little boy during her rounds, but nevertheless, "he came over to me, and he grabbed my hand. He was so loving, and he wanted a hand to hold."
As the boy's father watched from the motel door, Dingman couldn't help but pull out her smartphone and take a photo, posting it later on Facebook. "I just felt really grateful that I was able to hold his hand and love on him for a while," she said.

Ryder's family represents America's 13.1 million households with children that often go without food: "food-insecure households."

"Food is a struggle at times," said Ryder's mom, Kelly Ann Pfaffly, who also is raising a newborn boy.
Pfaffly, 23, and her 24-year-old husband, Justin, have been married five years. They -- along with Ryder, his 7-year-old sister and his infant brother -- all live in a small room at the hotel. "We've been struggling for quite sometime now," she said. "But we always find a way to make it."
She said she and her husband always make sure the kids have food and clothes. "Even if they don't like wearing them," she joked.
Money from cleaning hotel rooms doesn't always last them through the month. Neither do foodstamps. Lately, the family's broken-down car has made transportation difficult, prompting Kelly to quit her part-time cashier job at a local restaurant.
Located deep in the heart of the Ozark Mountains, the area is swimming in "up to 65,000 visitors daily who pump $1.5 billion into the local economy," according to the Branson Tourism Center. Yet the town doesn't have public transit.
A larger percentage of America's food-insecure households are outside metropolitan areas, according to the US Department of Agriculture.

Missouri ranked 12th in the nation for highest percentage of food-insecure households: 15.2% with "low or very low" food security in 2015, according to the USDA. North Dakota had the lowest percentage of food-insecure households with 8.5%, and Mississippi had the highest with 20.8%. The national percentage: 12.7%

'Greed and government'
Bryan Stallings, who co-founded Jesus Was Homeless with his wife, Amy, said southwest Missouri ranks among the nation's worst areas for child hunger, but "the community has responded with great programs." The nonprofit serves weekly meals to about 1,400 people, about 700 of them children.



Life questions: what are the words you live by? 01:07

The United States exports more food than any other country in the world. So why do families with children have trouble getting enough food in such a prosperous nation?
"The non-politcal answer, to me, is greed and government," Stallings said. "There's too many government health restrictions that force restaurants to throw away food" instead of donating it to the needy. "It's also greed: We're not helping our neighbors."
Most of it isn't intentional, said Stallings. "It's just not something most of us think about. We don't take care of people anymore," he said. "We live in a rushed society. We just don't have time."
Fighting hunger in southwest Missouri is challenging, he said, "because we don't have any major industry here. The ultimate way is to connect them to employment."

It's a stunning figure: America throws away an estimated 40% of its food, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council. That's an estimated $165 billion worth of food -- which could go far toward feeding those 13.1 million households with children. It actually works out to about $12,600 per household. A 2012 Gallup poll showed that American families spend an average of about $150 per week on food. That's about $7,800 a year.



Robert Lee of Rescuing Leftover Cuisine 02:52

Robert Lee and Louisa Chen launched a program in New York City that takes restaurant food that would otherwise be tossed out and diverts it to the hungry at homeless shelters and food kitchens. Seven days a week, the organization engages volunteers to pick up and deliver any amount of food, no matter how small.
It's getting better
The national percentage of food-insecure households has been dropping lately. It peaked at 11% during the 2008 recession, when so many Americans were losing their jobs. But as unemployment figures began to drop, so did the number of food-insecure households. By 2015, the percentage of American food-insecure households had dipped below 8%.

Volunteers and privately funded nonprofits like Jesus Was Homeless help to ease the problem. Dingman, who took the photo of little Ryder, got involved after watching working-poor families struggle to survive paycheck to paycheck. "I just realized how many people are hurting in our community, and I wanted to help them," Dingman said.



Greatest lessons learned from giving back 00:52

Helping the hungry shifted the perspective of Ashley Harkness, another Jesus Was Homeless employee.
"I started seeing that people that I used to judge are so much more like me," Harkness said. "We're all are only one paycheck away from poverty. The only difference is, I have someone who can help me -- and they don't."
School programs
The war against child hunger is also being fought in America's schools. Blessings in a Backpackis a nationwide program that helps school children who might otherwise go hungry by providing them with a backpack full of food for the weekends. It's funded in part by Walmart, Cigna and other private companies. But once schools close for summer break, this and many other school-linked programs disappear until the fall.



Play Video

Blessings in a Backpack fights child hunger 02:49

The federal Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act provides needy children with free breakfast and lunch at schools. But the USDA in May began relaxing guidelines for that program, opening the door to meals with reduced whole grains, higher sodium and higher fat and sweetened milk.
Hunger elsewhere in North America
One in nine people goes to bed hungry every night worldwide, according to the UN's World Food Program.
In Canada, where an estimated 1.1 million children suffer food insecurity, food banks have begun a national fundraising campaign.
In Mexico, which struggles with a poverty rate around 45%, the government launched its National Crusade Against Hunger in 2013. It included government-run kitchens aimed at feeding needy neighborhoods. Supporters have claimed successes, but critics expressed doubts about the program's effectiveness.
Stronger communities through volunteerism
Back in southwest Missouri, Jesus Was Homeless focuses on its mission to feed the hungry and help the needy. Stallings said it fosters strong communities through volunteerism.
"They're building a circle of friends and relationships," he said. "And I think that's huge."



One conversation we all need right now 00:59

Kelly and Justin Pfaffly want nothing more for little Ryder and his siblings than most parents: a safe place to live and raise their kids and enough work to make a living.
"We never ask for much unless it's absolutely necessary," Justin Pfaffly said.
Currently, they're relying on the kindness of their employer -- a hotel owner who advanced them rent money to live in the hotel in exchange for work cleaning rooms and performing maintenance.

They believe that if they can somehow purchase a reliable vehicle, it could give them better job options and more opportunities.
"I want my kids to never have to worry about being low on food and clean clothes," Justin Pfaffly said. "All in all, my hopes and dreams are that Kelly and I could finally give our children the life they need and most definitely deserve -- and for them to never worry again for things they want."



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1119672)2/22/2019 3:19:22 PM
From: Sdgla2 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
Mick Mørmøny

  Respond to of 1573719
 
Syvl has been on the wrong side of every transaction for at least 3 years. Explains all the hate and anger.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1119672)2/22/2019 3:24:33 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 1573719
 
U.S. IS A DISGRACE: Capitalist U.S. HAS HIGHER POVERTY RATE, LOWER LIFE EXPECTANCY RATE, HIGHER MALNUTRITION RATE, HIGHER INFANT MORTALITY RATE, HIGHER OBESITY RATE, HIGHER HUNGRY PEOPLE, LOWER EDUCATION RATE, HIGHER CRIME RATE, THAN EVERY EUROPEAN DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST COUNTRY. U.S. IS A SH*THOLE!!!! The US has a lot of money, but it does not look like a developed country
By Annalisa MerelliMarch 10, 2017
qz.com

The US is the world’s largest national economy, and the epitome of industrialization. Because of its wealth, high standards of living, and availability of world-class services, many Americans believe theirs to be one of the better— or outright best—countries in the world to live.

Measuring wellbeing can be tricky: Seemingly objective standards, like income, are affected by the availability of social services, which improve life even for low-earners. Infant mortality, another common measure of wellbeing, can actually be higher in countries where advanced healthcare technologies allow premature babies to be born in the first place. Nonetheless, there are some comparisons we can make: In 2015, the United Nations defined 17 goals for any country claiming to achieve complete sustainable development. Those goals range from ending poverty, to gender equality, to environmental preservation.

Quartz used those goals to compare the US development to that of other wealthy nations, following the blueprint of a 2016 report by the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). We found that the US performs scores dismally in most areas—such as healthcare, education, and violence.

Below is a breakdown that shows how the US fares for 11 of the 17 goals. Since the US ranks about average in water and sanitation, sustainable production and consumption, ocean preservation, and landscape preservation, we didn’t highlight those in the analysis. We also didn’t look into climate change, as the sheer size and population of the US make it difficult to compare its impact with other countries, and didn’t explore the last development goal, global partnership, as it’s intended as an instrumental tool to implement other goals.

The analysis proves that, while Americans may be doing relatively fine, “best country to live in” is a serious stretch.

PovertyThe US has the second-highest rate of poverty among rich countries (poverty here measured by the percentage of people earning less than half the national median income.)

According to a 2012 UNICEF study, 23.1% US kids live in poverty. Other studies place the number a little lower, at about 20%, but both numbers are much higher than in other advanced countries. For black and Hispanic American children, the poverty rate is even higher, at 36% and 31%.

Food security and nutritionFood security is reflected in both access to food and diet quality. Obesity is a primary indicator of poor diet, and although the US isn’t the fattest country in the world (several Pacific island countries, as well as Qatar and Egypt, precede it), it leads OECD countries in obesity.

When it comes to food production, things aren’t quite as dramatic, though the US soil’s level of fertility is below the OECD average. Although its agricultural production remains one of the world’s largest, the country’s output growth was about 1% between 2003 and 2012—less than half of the OECD average of 2.5%.

HealthAmericans spend nearly 17% of GDP on health care, with a yearly per capita cost of over $9,400. That’s $1,600 more than the second-highest spender, Luxembourg, and more than double the OECD average.

But while Americans spend enormously, they remain in relatively poor health. The US has fewer physicians, hospital beds, and psychiatric care beds than most other economically advanced countries, ranking towards the bottom in each of these parameters. The US is also the only advanced economy in the world not to have full health coverage of its population.



Things aren’t better when it comes to mortality. Child mortality is higher in the US than any other advanced economy, and adult Americans also live shorter lives: Average US life expectancy is 78.8 years, nearly two years less than the OECD average. For comparison, Japan has the longest life expectancy in the OECD, at 83.7 years.

The US also stands out as one of the only countries in the world where maternal mortality has increased, rather than decreasing, over the past 15 years.

EducationWhen it comes to education, US schools are mostly distinguished by their high cost. The US is among the five countries spending the most (pdf, p. 10) on education between pre-primary and secondary school. Plus, Americans spend far more on higher education: The cost (direct and indirect) of a tertiary degree in the US is around $110,000 for both men and women, against an OECD average of $50,000 for men and $40,000 for women.

In the US, early childhood education is attended by fewer children (55% versus an OECD average of 84% attendance), at an older age (four years old, versus three years old), and can be administered by untrained professionals. Most other high-income OECD countries have specific educator certification requirements.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the US fares just about average among OECD countries when it comes to basic literacy and problem solving skills. Advanced literacy (pdf, p.15) in the US is below the OECD average. Basic numeracy in the US is lower than in most other wealthy OECD nations.

Gender equalityGender equality is a point where the US does relatively well. Unlike previously analyzed indicators, the US doesn’t much differ from countries such as the UK, Australia, or Austria. The US also reports a high level of perceived safety by women walking home on their own. However, the share of US women who experience violence in their lifetime is much higher than the OECD average (though reporting violence in some countries may be discouraged).

US women’s political representation also leaves much to be desired, with less than 20% of congressional seats occupied by women. Sweden, the OECD leader, has nearly 45% in its national parliament, and the global average is nearly 27%. Female representation on the boards of publicly traded US companies is also below OECD average. To top it off, the gender wage gap is also bigger in the US.

The US is also, with Lesotho, one of only two countries in the world that do not mandate paid maternity leave.



EnergyAmerica excels in access to energy: 100% of the US population has access to electricity. What it doesn’t excel at, however, is renewable electricity sources: Only 12% of US energy output is renewable, far below the European, world and OECD average.

EmploymentDespite the much-discussed need to bring jobs back to the US, there are plenty of jobs in the country. Employment is one of the parameters in which the US does better than many other advanced economies, with low unemployment, high employment, and low share of youth who are neither working nor studying.

The US also does remarkably well in employing immigrants. At 5.8%, unemployment among immigrants in the US is lower than among native-born Americans, and one of the lowest among OECD countries.

InfrastructureThat the US needs better infrastructure is a bipartisan belief of late. As Barack Obama did before him, Donald Trump has highlighted the dire state of American transportation infrastructure, and promised massive investment in that respect. Current US investment in infrastructure is only 75% of the average OECD nation.

The US is also one of the countries with the highest number of deaths resulting from car accidents.

InequalityThe US has the highest income inequality of all rich countries. Income inequality is calculated by the OECD combining several indexes, including a ratio of the income of the highest 10% and of the lowest 10%.

Housing and urban developmentAmericans like their homes big—and they have them so. Each American has, on average, 2.4 rooms to live in, while the average OECD citizen has 1.8.

Only Canadians, at 2.5, have more rooms per capita. But while Canadians spend 21% of disposable income on their many rooms, lucky Americans spend only 19% on housing, on average.

Peaceful livingMeasuring a nation’s quality of life and development also includes intangible measures, such as the incidence of violent crime and democratic participation. In those aspects, the US fares pretty poorly: Deaths by assault are almost five times as high in the US as the OECD average (with the exception of Mexico).

The US also has one of the highest ratios of childhood death by injury (both intentional and unintentional). This accounts for nearly half of all US childrens’ deaths (pdf, p. 7, 8).

When it comes to democratic institution, the US has one of the lowest turnouts among high-income countries. (The US is one of the few countries where eligible citizens aren’t automatically registered to vote.)

Correction: An earlier version of the story featured a chart that showed growth in GDP per person per hour, but mistakenly introduced as GDP per person per hour.

Sign up for the Quartz Daily Brief email

Sign me up

Stay updated about Quartz products and events.