SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (28017)1/19/1998 4:33:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1573841
 
Jim - Re: "So if AMD had Intels technology they could already have K6-300s?"

If AMD had Intel's technology, THEY WOULD BE INTEL.

They're not.

Re: "the design limitations are on the K-6 vis a vis speed
and .25u process."

Hard to say - Their circuit layout has been reported as sub-optimum - with Metal 1 being used for Power supply and ground busing - instead of interconnect. Also, their L1 cache could have been laid out closer to their execution units - where it is needed.

At the product launch, AMD made a big hullabaloo about their CAD capability - about how quickly they could change the K6 design and implement those changes. I wonder what happened since then? The K6 shrink to 0.25 micron was supposedly already done at that time. That leaves only the K6-3D chip being produced for the past year.

Paul