Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1120364)	2/25/2019 11:37:44 AM
From: ryanaka	Respond to of 1574854

Pick and choose what you like (that suits your purpose/pre-determined conclusion), and leave out the data that you don't like (those that are in conflict with the pre-made conclusion), this is the most obvious and prevalent academic dishonesty. If a researcher did that in a Research Institution, he or she will be fired ASAP (after a due process) with any published article retracted. That person will never be hired again by another Institution. This is why, when it comes to scientific conclusions, you listen to those well established practicing researchers in the particular area, with the results and findings published in the reputable peer-reviewed science journals. For the rest of us, all we should do is to discern the source carefully and listen to the source. The climate deniers are financially or politically motivated. They use Financial interest or political interest and already pre-conclude the results of scientific investigations. They are criminals. Climate denying is not just an innocent ignorance anymore. They are committing willful negligence of criminal consequences. When the denying will ultimately lead to destruction of human life and livelihood on this earth, then it is a serious crime. These climate enemies should be recorded and prosecuted when the destruction gets too severe to ignore any longer.