Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (1121314)	2/28/2019 4:51:30 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575427

The check was payment for a bill he received from his lawyer. Paying it was no crime.

To: RetiredNow who wrote (1121314)	2/28/2019 5:07:52 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575427

Actually, Cohen took responsibility for his problems, admitted his wrongdoing. Very un-Trumplike. Yes, legal proof is required in court. I assume you'll commit to accept it when that happens. Despite the fact that Trump will never stop lying about his crimes. All along, I've said that Democrats should go after Trump for his women, if they really wanted to find any crimes that might exist, but that Russia collusion was just a big distraction. Russian collusion is the most serious issue, but the most difficult to prove in court. Trump will fall on the easiest crimes to prove first. Doesn't make the other less important. Throughout the campaign, Trump lied about seeking a Moscow hotel deal he signed a letter of intent to get. The deal would've have involved loans by Russian state owned banks that the US had sanctions on. Why did he lie about this?