To: Pugs who wrote (8507 ) 1/19/1998 7:30:00 PM From: Hawkmoon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13091
Pugs, Are you posting to the GRNO thread due to an interest in GRNO or because of the current situation with RMIL?? I have done my DD on GRNO as well as many, many others. As I have stated, GRNO has continuously invited its shareholders or interested parties to visit and discuss the merits of the technology. They have a demonstrable processor in place and operational. All parties who observe production of #2 diesel at 200gph (275gph feedstock throughput) fully realize that the technology will produce at even higher capacity. The technology is not "flawed" as you so ascerbically assert. It is constrained by current Governmental permitting constraints. S.Carolina has one of the strictest environmental permitting procedures in the United States. This is the only thing that prevents the processor from operating at full capacity (maybe immediate storage of final product is a temporary constraint as well for now). What we have left, Gary, is a operational and demonstrable processor with interest from a variety of parties. I, and others, have to base our opinions upon observable and intuitive evidence. Since I realize that the processor technology is highly profitable based on current market economics domestic and foreign, I can use intuition in assessing the probabilities of a customer stepping forward and making a $2.5+ million purchase. I am sorry to see that your sole purpose for asking your questions seem to be based upon a "personal issue" with my posting related to another company. I will not discuss the merits/demerits of another company on this thread, nor any rationale for posting on another thread. If you don't believe GRNO is worth you time and trouble to look at, that is your decision and I respect it. However, I, and others, will always be available to answer any questions related to our opinions on this investment. All the best!! Regards, Ron