Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Garlic Breath who wrote (1123687)	3/9/2019 3:42:35 PM
From: Heywood40	2 Recommendations Recommended By J_F_Shepard Wharf Rat Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574094

I am hung. Did you mean hanged?

To: Garlic Breath who wrote (1123687)	3/10/2019 3:30:27 AM
From: Heywood40	2 Recommendations Recommended By rdkflorida2 sylvester80 Respond to of 1574094

Brett M. Kavanaugh supported and argued for rigorous congressional oversight during Kenneth Starr’s investigation into President Bill Clinton’s affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. “When Congress learns of a serious allegation against a president, it must quickly determine whether the president is to remain in office,” Kavanaugh wrote for The Washington Post in a piece that ran Feb. 26, 1999, under the headline “First Let Congress Do Its Job.” Kavanaugh, then a top lawyer for the Starr investigation, was averse to the idea of a badly behaved president and the independent counsel statute. For Congress to sit idly by and defer to the counsel’s investigation, he said, is “not what the Constitution contemplated.” “There simply was no need for this mess to have occupied the country for 13 months,” Kavanaugh suggested, because Congress could have “gotten to the truth” much faster.