Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (146742)	3/10/2019 3:48:02 PM
From: Joseph Silent	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217619

This is quite different from the concerns we had about many, many statements from Trump. It does not seem that Pence is lying, given that he likely exhibits a consistency with his position. He has a steadfast position and he tries to justify it. Now, is it a false statement? How can we decide? If A = "evolution is true" and B = "creation is true" and there is no way to give a undeniable proof of either A or B, then you will always have one group for A and another group for B, as long as there is some "profit" (loosely defined) associated with each. Not A does not imply B, and not B does not imply A. But people act as if they do. For myself, I know why Pence misunderstands B. This is an error which permeates all religions west of the Suez. The problem has to do with mistaking metaphor for fact, and thus looking at myth (important instruction) at an intellectual level and not at a spiritual level. Regardless of what A is, B is a metaphor. Every religion has it's own version of it, but some know how to read the metaphor. These are religions which (a) do not throw a holy book at you, and (b) do not try to pull you into the religion to "save" you. So, in brief, no. :) I am still learning these things. Slowly.