Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: M. Murray who wrote (402397)	3/11/2019 8:33:56 PM
From: Alex MG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542785

Trump won a 2018 club championship — without actually playing in it! - man wins golf tournament at Trump club -Trump, as president but at his own club, challenges man to 9-hole golf-off -Trump claims "co-championship" -Trump has special plaque made claiming championship for himself golf.com/news/2019/03/10/president-trump-club-championship-did-not-enter/ … Yes, Trump was president of the United States for all of 2018. Yes, Trump turned 72 last year, which would be an impressive age to win even a senior club championship. But there the plaque is, identifying Trump as the reigning club champion at his spectacular Trump International course. His most recent win brings Trump’s club-championship haul — all won at clubs bearing his name — to an even 20.

To: M. Murray who wrote (402397)

3/12/2019 2:13:41 AM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542785

I know Pelosi said she wanted it to be bipartisan. But I don't think the rule of law works that way .

It doesn't matter if the senate wont impeach. If a person breaks the law or is unfit for office they need to face the social consequences. That demands he face a trial in the House.

The rule of law needs to be carried out in the manner they allude to in the movie The Paper chase.

When Obama refused to prosecute the bankers, or Pelosi refuses to impeach, they are making existential decisions that are breaking the law.

Only judges get to make existential decisions and only when they enter a gray area.

The evidence about Trump is clear and it says he should be impeach, exactly like if someone kills someone. They have to be arrested. The cop cant let them go :)>.

Our politicians should not be playing fast and loose with the law. .

<<

Perhaps she thinks he's not worth impeaching because it will never be confirmed with the current Senate.

It would also be disastrous to take a swing at him and miss, even though I've never seen a president who deserves impeachment more than trump (even more than Nixon IMO) I would only want the process to occur if he would be totally impeached.

I'm pretty sure that the SDNY is going to be waiting for this asshole the second his term is up and that is a wonderful thing.

And we still have to see what Mueller has to offer. If he didn't have anything on trump one would think this investigation would have been over long ago.

I still am struggling with the notion that even with the amount of investigations that this turd is under he can still run for re-election.

If these were really iffy investigations I would understand but I have very little doubt that this prick will get nailed on several, if not everything he is being investigated for.

He needs to go!!!!