SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 1:25:09 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217576
 
Agree with car example.. Up here in Ontario.. Say on 401 going from Toronto to Quebec border.. Speed limit is 100kph.. If you do 119/120.. Police ignore you.. Just common sense by both parties.. Unless weather conditions are bad.. Takes into consideration your points I reckon.

On the plane. .. Not just China banning eh.. Now UK US lapdog joining the club.. ?

But I reserve judgement on plane.. Too soon to decide if Boeing negligence or not.. Maybe just a bad design with nothing nefarious..

China tit for tat.. Way of world.. Nice to see China join the modern system



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 1:30:46 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217576
 
Trump says Boeing aircraft are too complex for his monkey-mind to understand.

Fortunately Trump believes the solution is as simple as building a border wall and making Mexico pay for it, or having his son-in-law create peace in the Middle East. It's all so easy! But only Trump can fix it.




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 7:21:58 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217576
 
re <<But fun for China to ban Boeing = Huawei Boeing tit for tat. >>

was thinking about that link, but may not actually be linked, or perhaps to be linked later

just another card dealt across the table



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 7:35:31 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217576
 
re <<Huawei>>

the insurrection is at it, per chairman Mao's stratagem of surrounding and lay siege to the cities by turning the countrysides

big Goliath America seems to be uncharacteristically alarmed about a small David Huawei

2026 / 2032 beckons

wsj.com

America’s Undersea Battle With China for Control of the Global Internet Grid

Chinese company Huawei is embedding itself into cable systems that ferry nearly all of the world’s internet data

March 12, 2019 12:17 p.m. ET
A new front has opened in the battle between the U.S. and China over control of global networks that deliver the internet. This one is beneath the ocean.

While the U.S. wages a high-profile campaign to exclude China’s Huawei Technologies Co. from next-generation mobile networks over fears of espionage, the company is embedding itself into undersea cable networks that ferry nearly all of the world’s internet data.

About 380 active submarine cables—bundles of fiber-optic lines that travel oceans on the seabed—carry about 95% of intercontinental voice and data traffic, making them critical for the economies and national security of most countries.

Current and former security officials in the U.S. and allied governments now worry that these cables are increasingly vulnerable to espionage or attack and say the involvement of Huawei potentially enhances China’s capabilities.

Huawei Marine's Undersea Cable NetworkThe Chinese company, majority owned by Huawei Technologies, has worked on some 90 projects to build or upgrade submarine cables around the world.



Planned cables

Completed cables

GREENLAND

(DEN.)

RUSSIA

U.K.

CANADA

U.S.

CHINA

BRAZIL

Sources: Huawei Marine; TeleGeography

Huawei denies any threat. The U.S. hasn’t publicly provided evidence of its claims that Huawei technology poses a cybersecurity risk. Its efforts to persuade other countries to sideline the company’s communication technology have been met with skepticism by some.

Huawei Marine Networks Co., majority owned by the Chinese telecom giant, completed a 3,750-mile cable between Brazil and Cameroon in September. It recently started work on a 7,500-mile cable connecting Europe, Asia and Africa and is finishing up links across the Gulf of California in Mexico.

Altogether, the company has worked on some 90 projects to build or upgrade seabed fiber-optic links, gaining fast on the three U.S., European and Japanese firms that dominate the industry.

These officials say the company’s knowledge of and access to undersea cables could allow China to attach devices that divert or monitor data traffic—or, in a conflict, to sever links to entire nations.

Such interference could be done remotely, via Huawei network management software and other equipment at coastal landing stations, where submarine cables join land-based networks, these officials say.

“We are acutely aware of counterintelligence and security threats to undersea cables from a variety of actors,” said William Evanina, director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center. “Given that undersea cables carry the bulk of the world’s telecommunications data, safeguarding these cables remains a key priority for the U.S. government and its allies.”

Latest U.S. Concern Over Huawei Lies Deep Under The Sea

While U.S. security officials have openly targeted Huawei’s operations in the airwaves, they have been less vocal about another potential security threat: its undersea cables. Experts say in theory these cables could enable China to spy. Photo: George Downs/The Wall Street Journal

So far, Western allies have pushed the company out of at least one international project and tried unsuccessfully to thwart another.

Huawei Marine said in an email that no customer, industry player or government has directly raised security concerns about its products and operations.

Joe Kelly, a Huawei spokesman, said the company is privately owned and has never been asked by any government to do anything that would jeopardize its customers or business. “If asked to do so,” he said, “we would refuse.”

The U.S. has been lobbying allies hard, warning Germany in recent days that it would limit intelligence sharing with Berlin if Huawei built the country’s next-generation mobile-internet infrastructure.

Last week, Huawei filed a lawsuit in a U.S. court challenging a law that restricts federal agencies from doing business with the company.

Longer term, the U.S. and some of its allies see Huawei and its undersea cable business as part of China’s strategy to boost its global influence by building telecom infrastructure and exporting digital technology, including surveillance tools.


The ship GeoExplorer in Chile at the start of submarine exploration for an undersea cable project by Huawei Marine. Photo: Rodrigo Saez/Zuma Press

The U.S. has sought to block Huawei from its own telecom infrastructure, including undersea cables, since at least 2012. American concerns about subsea links have since deepened—and spread to allies—as China moves to erode U.S. dominance of the world’s internet infrastructure.

“This is another vector by which Huawei gets into the infrastructure of another country,” said retired Lt. Gen. William Mayville, who until last year was deputy commander of U.S. Cyber Command.

“Failing to respond to Huawei Marine cedes space to China,” he said. “The U.S. and its partners must meet and compete.”

Undersea cables are owned mainly by telecom operators and, in recent years, by such content providers as Facebook and Google. Smaller players rent bandwidth.

Most users can’t control which cable systems carry their data between continents. A handful of switches typically route traffic along the path considered best, based on available capacity and agreements between cable operators.

The Internet’s Undersea ArteriesRoughly 380 active submarine cables carry almost all the world’s intercontinental internet traffic via about 1,000 landing stations.



Terminal

equipment

Network

management

system

Armoured

cable

Cable landing

station

Cable with

bundle of

fiber-optic

lines

Sources: U.K. Cable Protection Committee; Alcatel Submarine NetworksSources: U.K. Cable Protection Committee; Alcatel Submarine Networks

With many more cables expected to be built in the coming years to service ballooning bandwidth demand from 5G and other services, the U.S. and its allies are exploring ways to address potential threats, especially from China.

Mixed signalsU.S.-led efforts to crimp Huawei’s undersea cable business, as with 5G, have had mixed success.

In June 2017, Nick Warner, then head of Australia’s Secret Intelligence Service, traveled to the Solomon Islands, a strategically located South Pacific archipelago. His mission, according to people familiar with the visit, was to block a 2016 deal with Huawei Marine to build a 2,500-mile cable connecting Sydney to the Solomons.

Mr. Warner told the Solomons’ prime minister the deal would give China a connection to Australia’s internet grid through a Sydney landing point, creating a cyber risk, these people said. Australia later announced it would finance the cable link and steered the contract to an Australian company.

“The concern was China could have an ability to in-build security vulnerabilities,” an Australian security official said. “It really mirrors the issues with 5G.”

In another recent clash, the U.S., Australia and Japan tried unsuccessfully in September to quash an undersea-cable deal between Huawei Marine and Papua New Guinea.


Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands Rick Houenipwela, left, and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull during a meeting last year. Photo: Pool/Getty Images

Huawei Marine said it uses some hardware and network management software from its Chinese parent company, and was “willing to make any product available to any security expert or government agency for evaluation.”

Industry representatives and some experts say most security risks in the undersea cable system can be mitigated. While submarine cables can be physically cut or disabled, technology makes it more difficult to intercept data undetected, said Kent Bressie, legal adviser to the International Cable Protection Committee, an industry group that includes Huawei Marine.

Landing stations are usually protected by fencing, guards and security cameras, Mr. Bressie said, and network management systems are designed to be walled off from the broader internet.

“If there are new risks or information that industry doesn’t have,” Mr. Bressie said, “there needs to be communication from governments to operators.”

U.S. and allied officials point to China’s record of cyber intrusions, growing Communist Party influence inside Chinese firms and a recent Chinese law requiring companies to assist intelligence operations.

Landing stations are more exposed in poorer countries where cyber defenses tend to be weakest, U.S. and allied officials said. And network management systems are generally operated using computer servers at risk of cyber intrusion. Undersea cables are vulnerable, officials said, because large segments lie in international waters, where physical tampering can go undetected.

At least one U.S. submarine can hack into seabed cables, defense experts said. In 2013, former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden alleged that Britain and the U.S. monitored submarine cable data.

The U.S. and its allies now fear such tactics could be used against them. American and British military commanders warned recently that Russian submarines were operating near undersea cables.

Last year, the U.S. sanctioned a Russian company for supplying Russian spies with diving equipment to help tap seabed cables.

Silk roadChina seeks to build a Digital Silk Road, including undersea cables, terrestrial and satellite links, as part of its Belt and Road plan to finance a new global infrastructure network.

A Pentagon report in January said these projects, while benefiting host countries, could help China obtain foreign technology and “enable politically motivated censorship.”

Chinese government strategy papers on the Digital Silk Road cite the importance of undersea cables, as well as Huawei’s role in them.

Huawei Marine began work last year on a 7,500-mile cable linking Europe, Asia and Africa.



Planned cables

FRANCE

Marseille

PAKISTAN

EGYPT

Gwadar

Karachi

DJiBouTI

SOMALIA

KENYA

SEYCHELLES

SOUTH
AFRICA

Sources: Huawei Marine; Peace Cable International Network

A research institute attached to China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, in a paper published in September, praised Huawei’s technical prowess in undersea cable transmission and said China was poised to become “one of the world’s most important international submarine cable communication centers within a decade or two.” China’s foreign and technology ministries didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Huawei Marine said it had no official role in either the Belt and Road or Digital Silk Road programs. Huawei Marine has a Communist Party committee, as Chinese law requires, but said the committee had no management authority.

Huawei Marine, based in the Chinese port of Tianjin, was formed in a 2008 venture with Global Marine Systems, a British company with ships to handle undersea cables. Global Marine was a successor to the entity that laid the first undersea telegraph cable in 1850, which connected England to France.

Huawei owns 51%. Global Marine’s 49% stake is in play: Parent company HC2 Holdings , headed by former hedge-fund manager Philip Falcone, said in October it was exploring a potential sale. That would open the door for Huawei or another Chinese company to take full ownership, which could require approval by British authorities.

Britain’s national security adviser, Mark Sedwill, told a parliamentary hearing in 2017 that attacks on undersea cables could have “the same effect as used to be achieved in, say, World War II by bombing the London docks or taking out a power station.”

HC2 and Global Marine both referred questions on Huawei Marine to Huawei, which declined to comment.

Early on, Huawei set its sights on expanding its business to the U.S. In 2007, Huawei Technologies installed equipment to upgrade the Hibernia Atlantic trans-Atlantic cable between landing stations in Lynn, Mass., and Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Huawei Marine has upgraded two transatlantic links, one from South Africa to Britain, and others in the Bahamas and the Azores.



Planned cables

Completed cables*

GREENLAND
(DEN.)

ICELAND

Reykjavik

Nuuk

Southport

Portrush

CANADA

U.K.

Milton

Halifax

Lynn,
Mass.

U.S.

AZORES
(PORTUGAL)

*In 2007, Huawei Technologies upgraded the Halifax to Lynn cable before the formation of Huawei Marine.
Sources: TeleGeography (U.K.-Canada cable); Huawei Marine

In 2011, Huawei Marine again upgraded the Hibernia Atlantic cable. It also agreed to build and provide $250 million in financing for a new trans-Atlantic link called Project Express, connecting New York and London for the financial industry.

Bjarni Thorvardarson, then chief executive of the cable’s Ireland-based operator, said U.S. authorities raised no objections until 2012, when a congressional report declared Huawei Technologies a national security threat.

Mr. Thorvardarson wasn’t convinced. “It was camouflaged as a security risk, but it was mostly about a preference for using U.S. technology,” he said. Under pressure, Mr. Thorvardarson dropped Huawei Marine from Project Express in 2013. The older cable network continued to use Huawei equipment.

Virginia-based GTT Communications now operates the cables formerly known as Hibernia Atlantic and Project Express, and it recently won a contract to provide trans-Atlantic communications for the Pentagon. GTT and the Pentagon both declined to say if the cables still used Huawei technology.

Huawei Marine hasn’t worked on U.S.-connected cables since 2013. Elsewhere, it has thrived.

The company is now the fourth-biggest player in an industry long dominated by U.S.-based SubCom and Finnish-owned Alcatel Submarine Networks. Japan’s NEC Corp is in third place.

Huawei Marine is expected to complete 28 cables between 2015 and 2020—nearly a quarter of all those built globally—and it has upgraded many more, according to TeleGeography, a research company.

Huawei Marine completed a 3,750-mile undersea cable last fall between Brazil and Cameroon.



Completed cables

CAMEROON

Kribi

BRAZIL

Fortaleza

Source: Huawei Marine

Some of the cables connect to U.S. allies, including Britain, Canada and France. Government agencies in those countries declined to say whether those cables still used Huawei technology.

Most other Huawei Marine projects are in the developing world, including newer ones financed by China’s state-owned companies.

The Brazil-Cameroon link was financed by Export and Import Bank of China and China Unicom , a Chinese telecom operator. The new Asia-Africa-Europe cable, financed by China Construction Bank , will connect Pakistan and Djibouti, where China opened its first overseas naval base in 2017.

In Pakistan, the cable network will land in Gwadar, a port China is developing as part of Belt and Road and where U.S. officials believe Beijing wants to open a naval facility, which China has denied. The cable is planned to connect to a land-based link with China.

—Max Colchester, Drew FitzGerald and Paul Vieira contributed to this article.

Write to Jeremy Page at jeremy.page@wsj.com, Kate O’Keeffe at kathryn.okeeffe@wsj.com and Rob Taylor at rob.taylor@wsj.com



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 7:48:52 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Respond to of 217576
 
about the planes

as Boeing is definitely part of deep state, what is bad for deep state is bad for Boeing and what is bad for Boeing is ...

scmp.com

European Union grounds Boeing 737 MAX, as a growing cascade of nations follows China’s lead after deadly crashesIn addition to the EU, regulators and airlines in 23 countries have now halted flights by Boeing’s 737 MAX The crisis of confidence was triggered when a brand new Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX crashed on Sunday, killing all 157 people on board
“EASA [the European Union Aviation Safety Agency] has decided to suspend all flight operations of the two affected models,” the agency said in a statement, referring to the Boeing Model 737-8 MAX and 737-9 MAX. The suspension was to go into effect from 7pm Tuesday, GMT.

It was also “suspending all commercial flights performed by third-country operators into, within or out of the EU of the above mentioned models.”

Boeing shares fall for second day, knocking US$25 billion off market value

The “precautionary measure” was “necessary to ensure the safety of passengers”, EASA said.

SUBSCRIBE TO SCMP TODAY: INTL EDITION

Get updates direct to your inbox

The groundings come after an Ethiopian Airlines MAX plane crashed on Sunday, six minutes after take-off, killing all 157 people on board. On October 29 last year, a 737 MAX 8 flown by Indonesia’s Lion Air crashed into the Java Sea, 12 minutes after take-off, killing all 189 passengers and crew.

Before the EU announcement, member states Ireland, Germany, France and the Netherlands were already among the expanding list of countries to have temporarily grounded the 737 MAX, following China’s unprecedented move on Monday to impose such restrictions on domestic carriers.

The UK’s Civil Aviation Authority had also said that in the absence of hard evidence through the Ethiopian aircraft’s black boxes, it was grounding the 737 MAX as a precautionary measure.

China’s decision to ground Boeing 737 MAX 8 driven by safety concerns

As of 2.30pm Tuesday, Eastern time, regulators and airlines in a total of 23 countries, plus the EU, had grounded the 737 MAX.

The raft of suspensions contrasted sharply with the more measured response in the United States, where regulators insisted the aircraft was safe to fly.

Most of the 371 MAX jets around the world have now apparently been grounded, with China alone banning flights by almost 100 of the planes operated by its carriers.

Prior to the EU announcement, the following countries had grounded the 737 MAX or banned it from their airspace: Australia, Britain, China, France, Germany, Indonesia, Ireland, Malaysia, Mongolia, Oman, and Singapore. The following airlines had grounded their 737 MAX fleets: Aeromexico, Brazil’s Gol Airlines, Aerolineas Argentinas, Cayman Airways, South Africa’s Comair, South Korea’s Eastar, Ethiopian Airlines, Icelandair, India’s Jet Airways, Norwegian Air Shuttle, Morocco’s Royal Air Maroc, and Turkish Airlines.

The US and Canada operate the second and third largest MAX fleets, with 72 and 40 aircraft respectively. These planes were still flying as of Tuesday.

Major North American carriers including Southwest Airlines have publicly backed the plane.

Hong Kong’s aviation authority has opted for no action but said it was contacting other airlines flying the plane in and out of the city. They are Russia’s S7 Airlines, which flies from Novosibirsk, India’s SpiceJet from New Delhi, MIAT Mongolian Airlines from Ulan Bator, and Garuda Indonesia from Jakarta. The last two have already stopped flying the 737 MAX. No Hong Kong carrier operates the aircraft.

A China Southern Boeing 737 MAX at Saint Petersburg airport in Russia. Photo: Shutterstock

“This is a temporary suspension while we wait for more information to review the safety risks of continued operations of the Boeing 737 MAX to and from Australia,” said Shane Carmody, CEO of Australia’s Civil Aviation Safety Authority and director of aviation safety.

While no Australian carriers operate the MAX jet, the decision affects foreign carriers; the only two that fly the planes to and from Australia are Fiji Airways and Silk Air, which has stopped on the orders of the Singapore aviation regulator.

The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore said that during the temporary halt of MAX flights it would “gather more information and review the safety risk associated with the continued operation of the Boeing 737 MAX”.

With MAX planes making up a fifth of Silk Air’s 35-strong fleet, the carrier was likely to seek help from Singapore Airlines to accommodate customers.

Meanwhile, Lion Air was said to be switching plane orders to rival manufacturer Airbus as well, after halting deliveries of 737 MAX.

China, the country with the most MAX planes, decided on Monday to stop domestic airlines from flying the aircraft, a move affecting more than a dozen carriers.

Carriers in China with larger fleets will be best placed to mitigate the impact of the suspension.

A brand new 737 MAX 8 crashed on Sunday. Photo: Boeing

The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said Monday that the jet was airworthy, and the country has not yet taken any action in response to the air disasters.

By 3pm Tuesday Boeing’s shares were down a further 5.5 per cent, following a 5 per cent drop on Monday.

Boeing said a software upgrade would be added to all MAX jets. Photo: AFP

Boeing and the FAA said that a software upgrade in development for several months would be added to all MAX jets in the coming weeks to improve safety.

But the US aviation authority added it would require design changes from Boeing no later than April in relation to the plane’s much criticised Manoeuvring Characteristics Augmentation System. The system has been linked to last year’s Lion Air crash.

“External reports are drawing similarities between this accident and the Lion Air flight 610 accident on October 29, 2018,” the FAA said in a public notice. “However, this investigation has just begun and to date we have not been provided with data to draw any conclusion or take any action.”

Albert Lam Kwong-yu, Hong Kong’s civil aviation chief from 1998 to 2004, said Singapore’s decision was likely to be replicated by other authorities.

“I think Singapore’s regulator is very professional,” he said. “They will have run through the procedures before coming to the decision … Singapore is an important aviation centre … and [so] this will have ramifications.”

Additional reporting by Agencies




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 8:12:47 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217576
 
there may be a solid case against the 737 max

watch & brief

meantime I checked on pending flights of family and self, and no max allowed

Hong Kong banned all 737 max already, as it may be a Tesla 3 of the sky

zerohedge.com

Pilots Complained About Boeing 737 Max 8 For Months Before Second Deadly Crash

"The fact that this airplane requires such jury-rigging to fly is a red flag. Now we know the systems employed are error-prone — even if the pilots aren't sure what those systems are, what redundancies are in place and failure modes. I am left to wonder: what else don't I know?" wrote the captain.

The complaints are about the safety mechanism cited in preliminary reports for an October plane crash in Indonesia that killed 189.

The disclosures found by The News reference problems during flights of Boeing 737 Max 8s with an autopilot system during takeoff and nose-down situations while trying to gain altitude. While records show these flights occurred during October and November, information regarding which airlines the pilots were flying for at the time is redacted from the database. - Dallas Morning News

One captain who flies the Max 8 said in November that it was "unconscionable" that Boeing and federal authorities have allowed pilots to fly the plane without adequate training - including a failure to fully disclose how its systems were distinctly different from other planes.

An FAA spokesman said the reporting system is directly filed to NASA, which serves as an neutral third party in the reporting of grievances.

"The FAA analyzes these reports along with other safety data gathered through programs the FAA administers directly, including the Aviation Safety Action Program, which includes all of the major airlines including Southwest and American," said FAA southwest regional spokesman Lynn Lunsford.

Meanwhile, despite several airlines and foreign countries grounding the Max 8, US regulators have so far declined to follow suit. They have, however, mandated that Boeing upgrade the plane's software by April.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who chairs a Senate subcommittee overseeing aviation, called for the grounding of the Max 8 in a Thursday statement.

"Further investigation may reveal that mechanical issues were not the cause, but until that time, our first priority must be the safety of the flying public," said Cruz.

At least 18 carriers — including American Airlines and Southwest Airlines, the two largest U.S. carriers flying the 737 Max 8 — have also declined to ground planes, saying they are confident in the safety and "airworthiness" of their fleets. American and Southwest have 24 and 34 of the aircraft in their fleets, respectively. - Dallas Morning News

"The United States should be leading the world in aviation safety," said Transport Workers Union president John Samuelsen. "And yet, because of the lust for profit in the American aviation, we're still flying planes that dozens of other countries and airlines have now said need to grounded."




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 8:17:24 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217576
 
states seem to recognise true danger with alacrity w/r to Boeing, and willy by the nilly w/rt to Huawei

people seem to take flying more personally

zerohedge.com

737 Max 8 Makes Unannounced U-Turn Over Romania Amid Mass Groundings

A Norwegian Air 737 Max 8 flying from Stockholm, Sweden to Tel Aviv, Israel made a dramatic mid-flight U-turn on Tuesday after the low-cost airline temporarily suspended all 18 of its Boeing 737 Max 8s.



The move comes as 31 airlines and several countries announced the grounding of the Max 8 following a deadly Sunday crash in Ethiopia which killed 157 people - the second in less than six months after an Indonesian Lion Air Jet plunged into the ocean last October, killing 189.

"In response to the temporary suspension of Being 737 MAX operations by multiple aviation authorities we have taken the decision to not operate flights using this aircraft type, until advised otherwise by the relevant aviation authorities," said Tomas Hesthammer, operations chief in an email to AFP.

Flight number DY4545 was a little more than halfway to Israel on Tuesday when it turned around and returned to Stockholm's Arlanda Airport.



Norwegian air acted immediately after the United Kingdom's Civil Aviation Authority announced that the 737 Max 8 would not be allowed in British airspace.

(h/t Kotzbomber747)

According to the Associated Press, the following list of countries and airlines have grounded the plane:

AUSTRALIA

Australia has announced a temporary ban on flights by Boeing 737 Max aircraft, although none of its airlines currently operate them. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority said Tuesday that the ban will affect two foreign airlines — SilkAir and Fiji Airways — that use them for flights to Australia. The authority said Singapore’s SilkAir has already grounded its 737 Max jets, and that it is working with regulators there and in Fiji to minimize disruptions. It said that Fiji Airways has two 737 Max 8 jets in its fleet. The airline had hoped to continue flying the jets to Pacific destinations.

___

BRAZIL

Brazil’s Gol Airlines has suspended the use of seven Max 8 jets. The airline said it is following the investigation closely and hopes to return the aircraft to use as soon as possible. Gol said it has made nearly 3,000 flights with the Max 8, which went into service last June, with “total security and efficiency.”

___

Trending Articles

More Desperate Hong Kongers Are Living Illegally In Steel…Though it recently following the longest streak of falling prices since 2016, Hong Kong's housing market remains one…

CAYMAN ISLANDS

Cayman Airways, a Caribbean carrier, said it stopped using its two Max 8 jets starting Monday. President and CEO Fabian Whorms said the move will cause changes to flight schedules. Cayman is the flag carrier of Cayman Islands, a British overseas territory.

___

CHINA

China has 96 Max 8 jets in service, belonging to carriers such as Air China, China Eastern Airlines and China Southern Airlines. The civil aviation authority directed the planes to be grounded indefinitely on Monday. It said the order was “taken in line with the management principle of zero tolerance for security risks.” There were eight Chinese citizens on the Ethiopian Airlines flight that crashed shortly after taking off on Sunday. The authority said it will consult the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing before deciding when to lift the ban.

___

ETHIOPIA

A spokesman for Ethiopian Airlines says it grounded its remaining four Max 8 jets as an “extra safety precaution” while it investigates Sunday’s deadly crash. The airline is awaiting the delivery of 25 more Max 8 jets.

___

FRANCE

No French airlines use the Boeing 737 Max, but as a precautionary measure, French authorities decided to “forbid all commercial flights on a Boeing 737 Max departing from, traveling to, or flying across, France.” In a statement Tuesday, the French Civil Aviation Authority said that “France is carefully following the progress of the inquiry” into the crash.

___

GERMANY

German Transport Minister Andreas Scheuer told n-tv television safety is the priority, and “until all doubts are cleared up, I have ordered that German airspace be closed for the Boeing 737 Max with immediate effect.”

___

INDIA

India’s Jet Airways says it is “in contact with the manufacturer” of Max 8 jets and has grounded five of them starting Monday. Indian airline SpiceJet also uses the aircraft, but it’s unclear if those planes are grounded. Calls and emails to the company were unanswered Tuesday.

___

INDONESIA

Indonesia said it would temporarily ground Max 8 jets to inspect their airworthiness. Director General of Air Transportation Polana B. Pramesti said the move was made to ensure flight safety. A Lion Air model of the same plane crashed in Indonesia in October. Indonesian airlines operate 11 Max 8 jets. Lion Air, which owns 10 of them, said it will try to minimize the impact of the decision on operations. The other Max 8 jet belongs to national carrier Garuda.

___

IRELAND

Irish aviation authorities have suspended flights by all variants of Boeing 737 Max aircraft into and out of Ireland’s airspace. Irish authorities say they made the decision “based on ensuring the continued safety of passengers and flight crew.”

___

MALAYSIA

The Civil Aviation Authority said in a short statement Tuesday that no Malaysian carriers operate the Max 8, but that foreign airlines are banned from flying the plane in Malaysia, and from transiting in the country, until further notice.

___

MEXICO

Mexican airline Aeromexico has suspended flights of its six Max 8 jets. Aeromexico said it “fully” trusts the safety of its fleet but ordered the grounding to ensure “the safety of its operations and the peace of mind of its customers.” It said other planes will take over the routes usually flown by the Max 8.

___

NORWAY

Norwegian Air Shuttle said it grounded its 18 Boeing 737 Max 8 aircraft on the recommendation of European aviation authorities. Tomas Hesthammer, the low-cost carrier’s acting chief operating officer, says that “the safety and security of our customers and colleagues will never be compromised, and once authorities advise to cease operations we will of course comply.”

___

SINGAPORE

Singapore has temporarily banned Max 8 jets — and other models in the Max range — from entering and leaving the country. The civil aviation authority said it was “closely monitoring the situation” and the ban will be “reviewed as relevant safety information becomes available.” SilkAir, a regional carrier owned by Singapore Airlines, has six Max 8 jets. It said the ban “will have an impact on some of the airline’s flight schedules.”

___

SOUTH KOREA

South Korean airline Eastar Jet said it would suspend operations of its two Boeing 737 Max 8 planes and replaced them with Boeing 737-800 planes starting Wednesday on routes to Japan and Thailand. The airline says it hasn’t found any problems, but is voluntarily grounding the planes in response to customer concerns.

___

TURKEY

In a statement on Twitter Tuesday, Turkish Airlines CEO Bilal Eksi said all Boeing 737 Max flights are suspended until the “uncertainty affecting safety is cleared.” He added that passenger safety was the company’s priority.

___

UNITED KINGDOM

The UK Civil Aviation Authority said in a statement Tuesday that though it had been monitoring the situation, it had as a precautionary measure “issued instructions to stop any commercial passenger flights from any operator arriving, departing or overflying UK airspace.” Five 737 Max aircraft are registered and operational in the United Kingdom, while a sixth had planned to start operations later this week.

***

Update: Belgium has also banned the 737 Max 8.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 9:13:44 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217576
 
latest from some folks who may matter, the Boeing 737 max 8 is done for, as in put a fork in it and dip it in sauce

wonder what trade balancing goods teams America and China would now have to count on ?

would say the EU airbus is a go go go, as far as team china is concerned, but of course, only if EU plays ball on huawei non-issue

all very interesting



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 9:19:51 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
SI Ron (Crazy Music Man)

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217576
 
child's play




To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/12/2019 11:40:14 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217576
 
Nothing political / geo-political

Team China doubles-down on national champion Huawei, or Boeing or whatever

So confusing ...

bloomberg.com

U.S. Doubles Down on 737 Max Safety as Other Nations Ground Jet
Alan LevinMarch 13, 2019, 6:18 AM GMT+8
Agency Administrator Daniel Elwell issues statement on plane


U.S. aviation regulators reiterated that they see no safety issue with the beleaguered Boeing Co. 737 Max jetliner that warrants grounding the plane despite a pair of deadly crashes and the move by more than 40 other nations to temporarily take it out of service.

Federal Aviation Administration acting chief Daniel Elwell said Tuesday evening that the agency continues to closely monitor an investigation into a fatal crash of one of the planes on Sunday in Ethiopia and will take action if necessary.

“Thus far, our review shows no systemic performance issues and provides no basis to order grounding the aircraft,” Elwell said in the statement. “Nor have other civil aviation authorities provided data to us that would warrant action.”

The statement came at the end of a whirlwind day that saw Boeing stock plummet as nation after nation moved to ground the plane despite reassurances from the agency and the Chicago-based planemaker. In addition to China and India, the influential European Aviation Safety Agency moved to ban flights of the 737 Max, Boeing’s best-selling model.

Earlier: FAA Faces Stunning Rebuff as World Races Ahead to Ground 737 Max

“The accident investigation is currently ongoing, and it is too early to draw any conclusions as to the cause of the accident,” EASA said in an emailed statement. The agency, which usually goes along with the FAA, said it was acting out of an abundance of caution and out of concern for passenger safety.

After President Donald Trump criticized modern airplanes for being too complicated, he spoke on the phone to Boeing Chief Executive Officer Dennis Muilenburg, two people familiar with the matter said. Muilenburg assured Trump he is confident the plane is safe, according to one of the people, who asked not to be identified discussing a private conversation.

The FAA and the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board have teams observing Ethiopian authorities on their investigation of Sunday’s crash. All 157 people aboard the Ethiopian Airlines 737 Max 8 died when it plunged into the ground at high speed about six minutes after takeoff Sunday morning near Addis Ababa. Investigators have released no information about what caused the crash.

“In the course of our urgent review of data on the Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crash, if any issues affecting the continued airworthiness of the aircraft are identified, the FAA will take immediate and appropriate action,” Elwell said.

The Ethiopian crash was the second fatal accident involving the Max model within five months. A Lion Air Max 8 crashed on Oct. 29 off the coast of Indonesia, also shortly after takeoff, following a malfunction of a software feature on the plane repeatedly forced it into a dive, according to that country’s investigation. All 189 people aboard died.

While the Ethiopian plane descended unexpectedly twice after takeoff, similar to the repeated dips made by the Lion Air plane, there has not been any evidence released that directly links the two crashes.

Boeing 737 Max Crash Fallout: Where The Planes Are Grounded

Boeing reiterated earlier Tuesday that it has “full confidence” in the safety of the 737 Max. Since the FAA isn’t mandating any new action, “based on the information currently available, we do not have any basis to issue new guidance to operators.”

The single-aisle Max family is Boeing’s largest seller and accounts for almost one-third of the company’s operating profit. The company’s stock fell 6.1 percent to $375.41 at the close in New York, bringing the two-day drop to 11 percent. The company has lost almost $27 billion in market value this week.

As a result of the Lion Air investigation, the FAA on Monday said it planned to order Boeing to make software fixes to the plane’s Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System by April.

MCAS automatically pushes the Max jet’s nose down in limited situations to keep air flowing over the wings to prevent a dangerous aerodynamic stall. Because a faulty sensor on the Lion Air plane was sending it erroneous data, it attempted to repeatedly dive, forcing the pilots to pull the plane back up. The aircraft crashed when pilots failed to arrest the last dive.

Boeing plans to make several changes to the system, it announced. It will limit the number of times MCAS can repeatedly push down the nose if pilots counteract it and make it less powerful so pilots can overcome the motion more easily. It will also add redundancy to the sensors to make the malfunction that occurred in Lion Air less likely.

— With assistance by Ryan Beene, and Julie Johnsson



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)3/13/2019 12:54:53 AM
From: Elroy Jetson1 Recommendation

Recommended By
elmatador

  Respond to of 217576
 
There's long been a lack of training and experience flying planes by pilots outside the US without the auto-pilot.

It's definitely what cause the Asiana 214 flight crash AT SFO because the glideslope beacon was offline for upgrade, so the pilots had to land manually which they were very uncomfortable with and landed hard on their tail.

Too many pilots uncomfortable flying after turning off auto-trim or other automation.

Yes, your brother says you turn off auto trim with one switch, but I you aren't comfortable taking over, it doesn't improve the situation.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)10/22/2019 4:09:06 PM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations

Recommended By
abuelita
ggersh

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217576
 
Re <<737 ... monkeys ... Boeing ... Huawei ... unintended ...>>

Has you brother changed his mind w/r to monkeys in pilot seats vs monkeys in executive chairs?

nytimes.com

Top Boeing Executive to Leave as 737 Max Crisis Swells
By David Gelles and Natalie Kitroeff

Updated 3:32 p.m. ET


Kevin McAllister has been at the center of Boeing’s efforts to fix an automated system that contributed to two deadly crashes and return the 737 Max jet to service.Jason Redmond/Reuters

Boeing’s executive in charge of commercial airplanes is leaving, the company said on Tuesday. He is the most senior official to depart as the airline maker struggles to contain the crisis following the crashes of two 737 Max jets that killed 346 people.

The executive, Kevin McAllister, had been at the center of the company’s efforts to fix the automated system that contributed to the two crashes and return the plane to service. This month, The New York Times reported that he was under scrutiny inside the company for his poor handling of customer relationships and his management of the commercial division, which is Boeing’s largest business.

Stanley A. Deal, the head of global services for Boeing, will replace Mr. McAllister.

His departure adds a new element of volatility to the biggest crisis in the company’s 103-year-history. The Max jets have been grounded since March, costing Boeing at least $8 billion and disrupting the global aviation industry.

“We’re grateful to Kevin for his dedicated and tireless service to Boeing, its customers and its communities during a challenging time, and for his commitment to support this transition,” the company’s chief executive, Dennis A. Muilenburg, said in a statement.

The news about Mr. McAllister comes days after messages became public that suggested a pilot working on the Max had voiced concerns about the automated system in 2016, months before the Federal Aviation Administration certified the plane. That system, known as MCAS, was found to have played a role in the accidents.


Boeing 737 Max: What’s Happened After the 2 Deadly CrashesBoeing remains under intense scrutiny nearly one year after the first Max jet was involved in a fatal accident.

Those messages undermined Boeing’s long-held position that it had no indication that the Max was unsafe until the crashes of Lion Air Flight 610 in Indonesia last October and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 in March.

Since the Max’s grounding shortly after the second crash, airlines have canceled thousands of flights and lost hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue.

The Max’s return to service has been delayed multiple times in recent months as Boeing and global regulators have uncovered new problems with the plane. Airlines do not expect the plane to fly again until next year.

Boeing has said that if the delays persist much longer, it may be forced to halt production of the Max, a drastic step that would disrupt Boeing’s enormous manufacturing work force and its vast network of suppliers.

Boeing is facing multiple investigations and lawsuits related to the crashes, including a criminal investigation being led by the Department of Justice. Boeing is scheduled to report quarterly earnings on Wednesday, and Mr. Muilenburg is preparing to testify before Congress next week.

The commercial division is dealing with problems beyond the Max. They include claims of shoddy production at Boeing’s plant in Charleston, S.C.; cracking on the 737 NG, the Max’s predecessor; and the discovery of foreign objects inside the KC-46 tanker, a military aircraft that the group builds.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)10/22/2019 9:45:55 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217576
 
turns out Boeing 737 Next Generation plane, another variant, has issue w/ keeping the wings attached to the fuselage, which I suppose is a human error of sort, even including the pilot, in that they decided to fly the plane. As far as I can tell, the plane works better w/ wings attached.

finance.yahoo.com



edition.cnn.com

How bad are things for Boeing? Investors are about to find out

New York (CNN Business) — A top Boeing executive left the company Tuesday, the first to do so in the wake of the 737 Max crisis. What the mounting crisis is costing the rest of the company will become clearer to investors on Wednesday when the company reports earnings.

Out of a job is Kevin McAllister, who had been president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, the unit that builds its passenger jets. He is being replaced by Stan Deal, the head of Boeing Global Sevices, the unit of the company that provides engineering, analytics, supply chain services and training support to the aircraft maker's customers.

McAllister came to Boeing from General Electric in November 2016, after the Boeing 737 Max was well on its way to being certified and after the flawed safety feature at issue in the crashes was already part of the jet's design. The commercial airplanes unit is the core division of the company, responsible for about 60% of Boeing's sales revenue in normal times.

Boeing reports its third quarter results Wednesday, and it is expected to show a return to profitability. But that bit of good news can't outweigh all the bad news buffeting the embattled aircraft maker. Investors will be looking for some new guidance as to when the company's best-selling plane, the 737 Max, can return to service. The plane has been grounded since March following two fatal accidents that killed everyone on board in each case, a combined 346 people.
Boeing ( BA) has already taken a $5 billion charge related to compensation it expects to give to its airline customers. It is likely that Boeing will announce a new charge Wednesday because of continuing delays getting approval for the plane to fly again, said Cai von Rumohr, an aerospace analyst with Cowen.
"These [charges] are apt to be large," he wrote in a note Monday.

Boeing had been promising it would submit a final software fix, including completing a certification flight, to the Federal Aviation Administration by September, and that it hoped to have approval to have the plane flying again "early in the fourth quarter." But its latest update on Tuesday did not say whether it had submitted one. Boeing said only that "last week the company successfully conducted a dry-run of a certification flight test."

The company also received harsh criticism from the FAA on Friday for only recently alerting the agency to concerns about the plane expressed by two of its employees during the jet's 2016 certification process. In internal messages, the two employees had shared concerns about how the safety feature that is the focus of the cash investigation performed during simulated flights.

Questions about that earlier certification process are separate from whether Boeing has arrived at a fix for the plane. But "the most likely impact [of the revelation] is that this could delay approval of the revised software by the FAA and other global regulators due to political pressures," credit rating agency Standard & Poor's on Tuesday, as it warned that it might have to cut Boeing's debt rating.

In its statement Friday the FAA said it found the communication between the Boeing employees about the safety system "concerning" and that it is "disappointed that Boeing did not bring this document to our attention immediately upon its discovery."

All this suggests the regulator isn't rushing to return the plane to service. In fact, the agency said on Friday that "the FAA is following a thorough process, not a prescribed timeline, for returning the Boeing 737 Max to passenger service. The agency will lift the grounding order only after we have determined the aircraft is safe."

Boeing has continued to build the 737 Max during the grounding in order to try to meet a backlog of more than 4,000 orders for the plane that it has on the books. But it won't get most of the revenue from sales of the plane until delivery.

CEO Dennis Muilenburg, who was stripped of his chairman title earlier this month by the company's board, said three months ago that the company could be forced to suspend production of the Max if the approval for it to fly again is not completed by the end of this year.

The company's update Tuesday provided no details on production plans, but analysts are sure to ask about that on Wednesday.

There also will likely be questions about a separate problem with an older version of the jet, the 737 Next Generation. At least 38 of those jets have been grounded due to cracks discovered in a structural support that keeps the wings in place. Boeing has not yet indicated the cost to fix those planes or the time it will take, or provided an estimate on how many of the 6,800 planes in service might have the problem. Only 800 of the jets had been inspected when the initial grounding was reported earlier this month.

Analysts have been cutting their outlook for the company and the stock ahead of Wednesday's report.

"We can no longer defend the shares in light of the latest discoveries, discoveries which significantly increase the risk profile for investors," Credit Suisse analyst Robert Spingarm wrote in cutting his recommendation on the stock Monday, saying that the revelations of concerns about the plane's safety system contained in the messages revealed last week "may shatter the fragile trust between regulators and Boeing."

The revelations could also increase the political risks for approval of a return to service and threaten public confidence in the jet, Spingarm wrote. Muilenburg is scheduled to testify before Congress next week.

-- CNN's Rene Marsh contributed to this report.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (146842)9/16/2020 7:55:31 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Haim R. Branisteanu

  Respond to of 217576
 
Re <<Meanwhile 737 Max crashes = my brother a retired 737 and 747 captain said the problem is monkeys flying the aircraft. It's 1 second to flick off the trim switch and control the aircraft>>

Turns out either Team Boeing cretins and knaves, or / and Congress comprised of knaves and cretins.

zerohedge.com

Boeing Put Profits Before People's Lives By Hiding 737 MAX Design Flaws, Congress Finds

18 months after Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 plummeted out of the sky just minutes after takeoff last March, Congressional investigators have finally released a comprehensive report outlining the many mistakes made both by Boeing and the FAA during the certification process.



In the months that have passed, investigators have kept the pressure on Boeing (and its share price) with a steady stream of leaks. We've already seen emails showing Boeing engineers criticizing the 737 MAX 8 design time in some of the harshest terms imaginable (at one point, one irate engineer complained that "the plane was designed by clowns, who were supervised by monkeys".

But the 238-page report, released Wednesday morning by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and its subcommittee on Aviation, breaks it down into five specific broad problems that allegedly led to the deadly accidents, which prompted regulators around the world to ground plane back in March 2019, even after the FAA initially tried to reassure the world that there was 'nothing to see here'.

Below is a summary provided by the committee.

Production pressures that jeopardized the safety of the flying public. There was tremendous financial pressure on Boeing and the 737 MAX program to compete with Airbus’ new A320neo aircraft. Among other things, this pressure resulted in extensive efforts to cut costs, maintain the 737 MAX program schedule, and avoid slowing the 737 MAX production line.Faulty Design and Performance Assumptions. Boeing made fundamentally faulty assumptions about critical technologies on the 737 MAX, most notably with MCAS, the software designed to automatically push the airplane’s nose down in certain conditions. Boeing also expected that pilots, who were largely unaware that MCAS existed, would be able to mitigate any potential malfunction.Culture of Concealment. Boeing withheld crucial information from the FAA, its customers, and 737 MAX pilots, including internal test data that revealed it took a Boeing test pilot more than 10 seconds to diagnose and respond to uncommanded MCAS activation in a flight simulator, a condition the pilot described as “catastrophic.” Federal guidelines assume pilots will respond to this condition within four seconds.Conflicted Representation. The FAA’s current oversight structure with respect to Boeing creates inherent conflicts of interest that have jeopardized the safety of the flying public. The report documents multiple instances in which Boeing employees who have been authorized to perform work on behalf of the FAA failed to alert the FAA to potential safety and/or certification issues.Boeing’s Influence Over the FAA’s Oversight Structure. Multiple career FAA officials have documented examples where FAA management overruled a determination of the FAA’s own technical experts at the behest of Boeing. These examples are consistent with results of a recent draft FAA employee “safety culture” survey that showed many FAA employees believed its senior leaders are more concerned with helping industry achieve its goals and are not held accountable for safety-related decisions.All these flaws eventually led to the "preventable deaths" of 346 passengers. Boeing repeatedly dismissed warnings and complaints from employees related to MCAS, which was created to compensate for a redesign of the plane's interior to create more space for passengers. One of the flaws was that MCAS relied on a single sensor, which was prone to feeding faulty information.



Why did Boeing need MCAS? Because, as the NYT explains, the engines on the Max are larger and placed higher than on its predecessor, so they could cause the jet’s nose to push upward in some circumstances. MCAS was designed to push the nose back down. In both crashes, the software was activated by faulty sensors, effectively forcing the plane's nose down repeatedly, eventually forcing them into a fatal nosedive.

What's more, Boeing successfully lobbied the FAA to avoid classifying the new software as "safety critical", meaning that the company didn't need to update pilots on how it worked. Some pilots reportedly weren't even aware the software existed before the crashes. Boeing deliberately concealed test data showing that if a pilot took longer than 10 seconds to realize that MCAS had kicked in accidentally, the results would be "catastrophic". Boeing knew all that before the twin crashes that shut down the program...and the company still did nothing. The company also deliberately concealed faulty alerts that would have warned pilots about problems with the sensor used to trigger MCAS.

In a statement, DeFazio blamed Boeing for kowtowing to Wall Street pressure, and putting profits before people's lives.

"Our report lays out disturbing revelations about how Boeing—under pressure to compete with Airbus and deliver profits for Wall Street—escaped scrutiny from the FAA, withheld critical information from pilots, and ultimately put planes into service that killed 346 innocent people. What’s particularly infuriating is how Boeing and FAA both gambled with public safety in the critical time period between the two crashes,” Chair DeFazio said. “On behalf of the families of the victims of both crashes, as well as anyone who steps on a plane expecting to arrive at their destination safely, we are making this report public to put a spotlight not only on the broken safety culture at Boeing but also the gaps in the regulatory system at the FAA that allowed this fatally-flawed plane into service. Critically, our report gives Congress a roadmap on the steps we must take to reinforce aviation safety and regulatory transparency, increase Federal oversight, and improve corporate accountability to help ensure the story of the Boeing 737 MAX is never, ever repeated.”

Rep Rick Larson added that the report, combined with separate findings from regulators in Indonesia and Ethiopia, would help paint a more complete picture of what led to the crash.

One of the most egregious decisions made by Boeing was opposing a requirement that pilots receive simulator training to fly the plane. If pilots needed to be retrained, Boeing would have had to eat some of the cost out of its end of the deal, according to an NYT report. This focus on cost-cutting "drove a lot of really bad decisions," DeFazio said.

The Democrats on the committee also accused Boeing of putting a priority on profits by strongly opposing a requirement that pilots receive simulator training to fly the plane. Under a 2011 contract with Southwest Airlines, for example, Boeing promised to discount each of the 200 planes in the airline’s order by $1 million if the F.A.A. ended up requiring simulator training for pilots moving from an earlier version of the aircraft, the 737NG, to the Max.

“That drove a whole lot of really bad decisions internally in Boeing, and the F.A.A. did not pick up on these things,” Mr. DeFazio said.

The report alleges that the 'time pressure' imposed on the 737 MAX project was unusually intense. Keith Leverkuhn, former Boeing VP and General Manager of the MAX program, allegedly kept "a countdown clock" in a conference room, which he allegedly described as an "excitement generator".

"One of the mantras that we had was the value of a day,” he said, “and making sure that we were being prudent with our time, that we were being thorough, but yet, that there was a schedule that needed to be met…" one Boeing worker said.

Back in 2012, in order to lower development costs, Boeing reduced the work hours involved in the MAX's avionics regression testing by 2,000 hours. It also examined other reductions to save costs, including a reduction to flight test support by 3,000 hours.

Boeing doesn't shoulder the blame alone. According to the report, the FAA "failed to ensure the safety of the traveling public" as "excessive" outsourcing had "impaired [the FAA] from acting independently."

The report comes as regulators are reportedly close to finally lifting the grounding order by approving the newly redesigned MAX; the expectation is that the plane might be back in service before the end of the year.

In addition to the report, Congress has introduced legislation that would toughen the agency's certification process, in part by requiring that it carry out regular independent audits on company-employed representatives.

Responding to the allegations in the report, the FAA said it "is committed to continually advancing aviation safety and looks forward to working with the committee to implement improvements identified in its report.” Boeing, meanwhile, said it had learned lesson. "Boeing cooperated fully and extensively with the committee’s inquiry since it began in early 2019. We have been hard at work strengthening our safety culture and rebuilding trust with our customers, regulators and the flying public.”

But like we've learned from Sweden's approach to the pandemic: Just because people have the option of doing something, doesn't mean they will. The 737 MAX 8 has such negative associations, that President Trump suggested Boeing rename the plane, and the company has been quietly working on a rebranding effort.

After failing to ring up even a single order for the MAX in 2020, Boeing finally celebrated a small order from Enter Air, a Polish charter airline, a few weeks ago. However, recent reports about alleged design flaws with the aerospace giant's 787 Dreamliner, and other Boeing planes, could create lingering problems for shares even after the 737 MAX is back in the skies.

Read the full report below:

2020.09.15 FINAL 737 MAX Report for Public Release by Zerohedge on Scribd

Sent from my iPad