Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : THE OZONE COMPANY! (OZON) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SIer formerly known as Joe B. who wrote (2384)	1/20/1998 12:30:00 AM
From: RBattman	Respond to of 4356

Joe: I'm skeptical about all of the stocks I own (more so when they fall in value), so as far as I'm concerned ask away. Of course there are many ways to ask a question. The implication that a second hand statement which might have been inaccurately relayed or taken out of context is evidence of lying is a serious overstatement. I wasn't present at the shareholder's meeting. However the statements (if made) that: 1. "their would be a loss but not as much as the previous quarter." is borne out by this quarters numbers and is completely accurate if viewed on a per share basis - $-.06 vs $-.07 is less. 2. "revenues for the quarter would exceed revenues of the preceeding full year." also accurate. Gross revenues for the 3d quarter of approx $561,000 are significantly higher than revenues for the prior fiscal year. I don't know what Bill said. Perhaps he wasn't clear about the context of his remarks. Perhaps the gentlemen who was kind enough to post those remarks for all to read failed to capture the full import of Bill S's comments. No matter, the numbers are what they are and I agree with Bill, I am pleased with these numbers at this stage of the company's development. This "issue" which you have doggedly latched onto i) isn't that important and ii) has been beaten to death. Melinda's right, let's move on.