Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (2091)	3/16/2019 3:33:26 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Respond to of 13781

I get that.. totally.. and I do not think Boeing is some evil entity here.. That is why I made the post on cars.. those accidents are just less showy... No different (but far more complicated) than designing a new rain garden for example.. Take basic plan and adapt..

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (2091)	3/17/2019 11:46:35 AM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13781

Elroy, when the government mandated new set standards, like removing sulphur from Diesel, for example, the industry obliged and reprogrammed the plants. (You know this and its economics much better than I do, by the way) The costs incurred were passed to the customers who bought the now cleaner fuel. And the road haulage companies passed on to the final customers. Why the hoopla when governments mandate that your data should be "cleaned" and that means removing the Huawei from the supply chain? Many governments mandated that the pollutants be removed. It is no different with data, it just mean the customers have to pay for the costs of their "clean data". Security costs money. Huawei was a subsidy to the mobile operators -OUTSIDE THE US- who could, then, have higher profits by not passing the low prices to customers or lower the prices to compete.