Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (115115)	3/22/2019 3:31:11 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 357949

You’re missing the point. The agreement to participate in the Union was essentially a contract between states and the Union. Not between voters and the Union. That matters. It was an opt-in process by the states and they did not express a willingness to give up power. Do you think for a minute Arkansas would have agreed to join the Union u Dee the terms of having say in the leadership? Any other state? No, it wouldn’t have happened. This is the reason the Constitution has a provision that addresses this sort of side agreement. I cannot imagine the Court would let this become a law. I think they know it is a disaster if they did.